Dcc All Round Question
- Thread starter gpeezy
- Start date
Good question, George. I've always wondered that myself.
Good question
I would think that Greg Sullivan would know the answer. He posts on AZ from time to time. Maybe using a thread title like, "Calling Greg Sullivan" would work.
I would think that Greg Sullivan would know the answer. He posts on AZ from time to time. Maybe using a thread title like, "Calling Greg Sullivan" would work.
Points
They have a set amount of points you earn, based on your finish in each event. I'm not sure exactly what the points are, but if you look at the results during the one pocket rounds, the players had a point total next to their name. I made it to round 6 in the bank, and I think I got 16 points. If I remember right, Luat got about 80 for 2nd place, and I think it's 100 for first.
A couple of years ago, Dee Adkins won the all around, and never won a single event. He did however place well in all three. Versatility counts for something in this category
gpeezy said:
They have a set amount of points you earn, based on your finish in each event. I'm not sure exactly what the points are, but if you look at the results during the one pocket rounds, the players had a point total next to their name. I made it to round 6 in the bank, and I think I got 16 points. If I remember right, Luat got about 80 for 2nd place, and I think it's 100 for first.
A couple of years ago, Dee Adkins won the all around, and never won a single event. He did however place well in all three. Versatility counts for something in this category
Master of the Table is calculated as follows:
There are points awarded for the first 64 positions in each tournament.
* Get the top 64 or fewer players in a tournament
* Rank them by round eliminated in descending order
* 1st and 2nd get 120 and 100 points respectively (there are no ties for 2nd)
* The rest of the players split the points for the next n places where n is the number of players eliminated in that round (i.e. just like the PGA where if three players tie for 3rd they split the points for 3,4,5 places)
* Then of course you add up all the points for each player in all 3 tournaments
It uses this points table:
Place Points
1 120
2 100
3 80
4 60
5 50
6 50
7 40
8 40
9 30
10 30
11 30
12 30
13 25
14 25
15 25
16 25
17 20
18 20
19 20
20 20
21 20
22 20
23 20
24 20
25 15
26 15
27 15
28 15
29 15
30 15
31 15
32 15
33 10
34 10
35 10
36 10
37 10
38 10
39 10
40 10
41 10
42 10
43 10
44 10
45 10
46 10
47 10
48 10
49 5
50 5
51 5
52 5
53 5
54 5
55 5
56 5
57 5
58 5
59 5
60 5
61 5
62 5
63 5
64 5
There are points awarded for the first 64 positions in each tournament.
* Get the top 64 or fewer players in a tournament
* Rank them by round eliminated in descending order
* 1st and 2nd get 120 and 100 points respectively (there are no ties for 2nd)
* The rest of the players split the points for the next n places where n is the number of players eliminated in that round (i.e. just like the PGA where if three players tie for 3rd they split the points for 3,4,5 places)
* Then of course you add up all the points for each player in all 3 tournaments
It uses this points table:
Place Points
1 120
2 100
3 80
4 60
5 50
6 50
7 40
8 40
9 30
10 30
11 30
12 30
13 25
14 25
15 25
16 25
17 20
18 20
19 20
20 20
21 20
22 20
23 20
24 20
25 15
26 15
27 15
28 15
29 15
30 15
31 15
32 15
33 10
34 10
35 10
36 10
37 10
38 10
39 10
40 10
41 10
42 10
43 10
44 10
45 10
46 10
47 10
48 10
49 5
50 5
51 5
52 5
53 5
54 5
55 5
56 5
57 5
58 5
59 5
60 5
61 5
62 5
63 5
64 5
Example:
JohnBrumback
Banks 120 points (1st place)
One Pocket 27.5 points (Tied 10th through 15th) 30+30+30+25+25+25=165 165 divided by 6 equals 27.5
9 Ball 28 points (Tied 10th through 14th) 30+30+30+25+25=140 140 divided by 5 equals 28
Total: 175.5
Johnathan Pinegar
Banks 80 points (3rd place)
One Pocket 50 points (Tied 5th and 6th) 50+50=100 100 divided by 2 equals 50
9 Ball 45 points (Tied 5th through 8th) 50+50+40+40=180 180 divided by 4 equals 45
175 points
JohnBrumback
Banks 120 points (1st place)
One Pocket 27.5 points (Tied 10th through 15th) 30+30+30+25+25+25=165 165 divided by 6 equals 27.5
9 Ball 28 points (Tied 10th through 14th) 30+30+30+25+25=140 140 divided by 5 equals 28
Total: 175.5
Johnathan Pinegar
Banks 80 points (3rd place)
One Pocket 50 points (Tied 5th and 6th) 50+50=100 100 divided by 2 equals 50
9 Ball 45 points (Tied 5th through 8th) 50+50+40+40=180 180 divided by 4 equals 45
175 points
Last edited:
Not exactly a decisive victory...IMO Johns finish average is better than Brumbacks...I guess this could be debated either way. I think that if anyone were in Hennessee's shoes, where you lose by 1/2 of a point, it would make you sick. Maybe they should implement a rule you have to win by a certain number of points or a short all around match between the 2 is played....
One of the announcers on Accustats said that John Schmidt was not eligible for the all around because he did not play in all 3 events. Is this true?
If you take it to an extreme, if a player enters only 2 events and wins them both, and has the most points of any other player, will he not be master of the table because he did not play in the 3rd event?
If true, I wonder why a top pro capable of winning one event would not enter all 3.
If you take it to an extreme, if a player enters only 2 events and wins them both, and has the most points of any other player, will he not be master of the table because he did not play in the 3rd event?
If true, I wonder why a top pro capable of winning one event would not enter all 3.
iusedtoberich said:
It's true, you must play all three to be considered for the Master Of The Table.
