Dear Mods.

There is nothing "wrong" with the forum.

I'll say I will take the good with the bad *BUT*

I see selective rule enforcement (some users are allowed multiple name, some users are repeatedly banned and then allowed to return) and selective censorship (removing threads) that hurts the integrity of the forum.

I like the idea of having additional moderators and also favor locking threads rather than removing thread when it gets out of hands. If needed, I prefer seeing individual posts being removed (or contents removed and replaced with moderator warning), rather than losing the entire thread.

I've moderated a forum with above ideas. We still had battles among moderators but it was behind the scene. When moderators can't agree, then it's escalated to the power to be to make the call.
 
...viscous flame wars...

Now that is a scary thought.

I think the classified here is great, just needs tweaking. If someone's a constant dick, they should be banned from posting in classifieds. If someone is a thief and a cheat, they should be banned period - if not banned, at least the forum members should be allowed to beat them into submission.
 
Hey Jbravo,
Got your pm but for some reason my phone won't let me answer them. I having gotten the j/b yet. The guy didn't send it out till weds. So I should have by Tuesday at latest. If you have a better offer and don't want to wait. Just let me know. I'm in the car driving now so I'll check back once I get to my moms late tonight.
 
Hey Jbravo,
Got your pm but for some reason my phone won't let me answer them. I having gotten the j/b yet. The guy didn't send it out till weds. So I should have by Tuesday at latest. If you have a better offer and don't want to wait. Just let me know. I'm in the car driving now so I'll check back once I get to my moms late tonight.

Replied via pm thanks.
 
I recognize some of the people in this thread...I just can't remember from where...

Regardless, I'm against censorship so I would prefer threads are not deleted for any reason.

-Patrick
 
That sounds like the military mentality there...we have a couple of problems, so we will just punish everyone.

There is nothing "wrong" with the forum. Every now and then there is an issue, like the one some folks are going through with a couple of cuemakers, etc, but that is just a cross-section of the population in general. If you have hundreds/thousands of transactions, somewhere along the way, there are going to be issues.

It is not that people have problems during a transaction that makes things bad, it is how they chose to resolve it that matters.

I think often times folks "flame" a thread hoping that it will be pulled as a part of a strategy...maybe helping a buddy out, etc. It is that way with any argument/discussion.
Joe




Joe you are one of the most honest sellers who participates in the wanted for sale section on a regular basis, and I personally have a great deal of respect for the way you have done business throughout my time here as a member ( Since 2005).

But, I respectfully disagree that there is nothing wrong with how the forum leaders handle problems that occur in the wanted for sale section. In my opinion Joe they allow openly deceitful and dishonest people take advantage of far to many forum members. I personally think they need to get directly involved when patterns emerge where certain individuals over and over again take peoples money, make commitments they are not able to keep and then when things suit them apologize and resolve the situation. There is no need to mention names here most of us know who these people and how they operate, but here in lays the real problem the new members are who these people take advantage of because every thread that identifies their previous actions is gone.

The Moderators feel that once a problem is resolved that the thread should be removed. In most cases this really doesn't hurt anything, but for those individuals who are predator's and who pray on the new members there is nothing out there to warn them to trust and who not to trust.

Before some one brings it up, yes we have I-trader and that is all there really is to assist people who are new in making a decision concerning who is trust worthy and who isn't. The problem with I-Trader is that in far to many cases it is manipulated and it doesn't truly reflect a persons honesty and integrity. The following are problems that in my opinion make I-Trader useless:

1) Anyone can post an I-Trader comment for any other member whether they had a transaction or not.

2) While we are all adults and until other wise noted the systems use requires honesty and integrity and unfortunately not all members completely understand what those words mean and how important they are. It's kinda like ones name, at least for myself it is my most valuable possession, and it's value is based solely upon my integrity and honest, without those two important parts at least in my opinion a name is a useless word that describes nothing except a shadow with no substance.

3) Currently as I-Trader works there are two choices that can be used to describe a transaction Positive:D or negative:(. In many cases members are afraid of retribution if they post a negative comment in I-Trader and this is because no one polices this section very well and while some changes are made to false comments, many many more stay for the record. Now as we have seen blatant misuse of I-Trader by posting false comments that will get some one banned, but what happens to those who post Positive comments just to cover a friends ass? I think that there also needs to be a Neutral choice in I-trader, in many cases there are problems, but many feel so long as they are resolved a positive rating should now be given. In some cases their are members who intentionally sell items that are not described correctly and when caught they will offer a refund, but that doesn't make it right when their intent was wrong in the first place, and I think a Neutral rating will help identify those people who have a bad habit of doing this.

4) I think I-Trader needs to be updated so that unless a transaction takes place on this forum and has obviously taken place no comments should be posted. This can simply be done by also including the thread where the transaction took place, it would not take that much to change, in fact it could be added in the comments for all to see. This way some of those buddy / buddy transactions will be prevented and a more accurate picture of a members nature will be represented.

Last but not least, I think when a problem happens I think the Moderators need to contact both parties behind the scenes and help resolve the issue. They have everyones address, email address and phone numbers, and I think a list of names should be kept so that repeat offenders are identified. I think this could help solve many of the problems and stop all the speculation, also it would help the new members from falling into some of the traps.

I already know that many people may not agree with my thoughts on this subject, and that is OK we are all entitled to our opinion. The comments I have made are based upon observations I have made over the last 6 years, so if they do not apply to you let them go in one ear and out the other, if they do apply don't forget some of us are watching simply because we care.

JIMO
 
Last edited:
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."- George Santayana

I love that guys band man.

Yeah, I agree, we don't need any flame wars. People who start them should be banned. Specially Viscous ones, those are sticky.
 
Itrader

Here is another thought......When a negative Itrader is given, this opens up a claim against the seller. This claim would be sent to the mods and both members would submit FACTS and PROFF suporting each side of the transaction. The mods would then make a decision based on above information. The side that doesn't win would be banned until the situation is resolved one way or the other. This "case" would be made public record with all the proof and facts listed such as shipping infomation, invoice #'s, PMs, pictures and descriptions, and the way/time it was all worked out. This information would follow you around in the Itrader as a link to the case. This would go far to weed out the ones that are running a game.
 
Actually, the problem as I see it is that AZ Billiards is poorly moderated for it's size. On other forums they have more moderators to handle the workload. Here it's just easier to delete and lock a thread rather than to cull the offending posts and posters.

I agree with the statement. I used to be the liason for WebHostingTalk forum. The stats now are well over 6 million posts; and it was 3-4 millions a couple years ago when I was active there. The site is easily three times busier than here. We had a few senior moderators and a ton of paid moderators plus a serious amount of liaisons to keep the place civil and fair. Even with that amount of people from different countries working around the clock, we still overlooked many threads.
 
I think we all tend to make it a little more complicated than it has to be. For me, as a buyer, if the seller doesn't accept my PayPal, he doesn't exist. If he does accept PayPal, then whether he knows it or not, he is bound under a merchants' credit card agreement and will ultimately have to satisfy the buyer.

If I see something I like at the price I like on AZ or anywhere online I ask

1) is it straight ?

2) will you guarantee my satisfaction ?

3) will you take my PayPal ?

if they can answer yes, we can make a deal, I don't even look at their iTrader.

If everyone posting problem with DS in that thread had PayPaled (I understand he wouldn't accept it please see question #3 - I think he couldn't accept PayPal because his account was shut down due to a dispute...hmmmmmmmm) him and used a credit card, instead of posting and chasing and hoping DS would ever come around, or maybe respond to forum pressure, they'd have processed a charge back (assuming they didn't let DS stall them past the acceptance period) with their credit card company, they'd have the money back and they'd be moving on to the next.

Problem solved. If every buyer would demand every seller accept PayPal, We'd all be using our credit cards (which guarantee buyer satisfaction) and the seller would have no choice but to satisfy the buyer. Every transaction would be covered by a satisfaction guarantee. The merchant's agreement enforces what every good seller does anyway, the seller in any sight-unseen situation must offer their buyers an unconditional money-back guarantee. Anything else leads to the kind of stuff we read in the threads.

Me with that saw? I would have taken the broken item to UPS with the packaging and asked DS for a refund so he could wait to collect on the insurance. If he balked, I would have charged back my credit card. NEXT !!!!

Then we could go back to bashing each other about which chalk is best.

This thing where we expect the mods to fix our community problem seems to me a bit like going to the counter guy in the pool room because someone air-barreled us telling him, "well you provide the room, please make it safe for me." Please, they provide the space, its up to us to learn the moves and act right.

Thanks

Kevin
 
Last edited:
Back
Top