I think they get a little boring after awhile. I would rather see two races to 9. A race to 9 nine ball. Then a race to 9 eight ball. And a race to 5 in bank pool. Maybe throw in a little one pocket. Some variation would be nice but a long race is not that interesting.It was even boring in the TAR days, after the novelty of the first few wore away.
Yup, and with the same score each day -- 30 - 21.After two days it is 60 to 42, Gorst ahead. ...
That's funny......................Not for the first time, I agree. These long races, I feel, are what some players want….and they lose spectators…and side action.
I suggested a few years ago, if they want prolonged action, then play short sets…best out of.
I think it will increase the betting greatly….therefore the interest.
I‘m from the era where 90% of our gambling was by the game….had a guy at the Rack in the late 70s ask me to play for $2,000…
……race to 15….told him I was looking for action, not a career.
I'd even prefer them play several sets. I don't car if they play 3 sets a day and have a daily winner, or if they come up with some other way to arrange it. I don't know how many of Earl's matches I've watched, several more than once, and I still haven't finished watching the race to 120 against Efren. I think the problem with a long race is that if it's close, you only need to watch the last 20 games, and if it isn't close you could have declared the winner much earlier.A simple question, aren't these huge mega races getting a little boring or is it just me? I mean the first one back in the day when Earl and Efren went at it in that race to 120 in Hong Kong in which Efren pulled out a win in the last day was interesting as a novelty but now? Or maybe it's just that these players having nothing better to do with their time between tournaments, who knows I just find it's getting a bit old.
I agree, but I think this is a different level of endurance, like comparing the endurance of a marathon runner with an ultramarathon runner. I think it takes a level of endurance to play high level pool for an hour, two hours is probably as long as match should take. I want to see guys shooting at each other and which one proves he is the better player, not which one can hang on longer.Endurance and stamina are not what great pool is about
Let me put some context on that.I think winner break format with no break rules Dennis runs over him.
Honestly, I don't feel that there even exists a break rule in which Fedor doesn't have the advantage. Fedor's edge in breaking would be even greater at 10ball.I think winner break format with no break rules Dennis runs over him.
I think Dennis plays a ball worse since he stopped playing in the USA.
…..the visa problem took the wind out of his sails.
…..and the action scene over here is worse off
Yup, pool is a young man's game. Hard for older folks to focus and concentrate for that long.Father Time is still undefeated...
Last Turning Stone or 2 was watching Fedor be Fedor. Strickland watching muttered something about him never having to make tough shots....kind of the point.Honestly, I don't feel that there even exists a break rule in which Fedor doesn't have the advantage. Fedor's edge in breaking would be even greater at 10ball.
You can add to that point that there is no player in the world that can run over Fedor. There are a few that can beat him, but the list is fairly short. Fedor's not really an underdog to anyone in a long race right now.