I agree! Yes, it's strange, but it's a legal tool of the game. I also think that it's BS to change the rules because one person has figured a way to get an edge on their opponent by exploiting the break. It would be different IMO if Cory was "soft breaking" , not making a ball and leaving the rack in a mess. BUT, he figured out a way to make a ball on most of his breaks and proceed to try to run out. Which if I remember correctly was the point of the break in 9/10 ball. The industry had no problem with the Sardo rack when it allowed EVERYONE to make that wing ball on just about every break. NOW THAT'S BS! Anyone that puts enough time into learning that break should be allowed to use it IMO.
Also, when I was watching the World Pool Masters. they were not "soft" breaking but were still bound by the rule requiring 2(3?) balls past the head string. What a crock! So now you can smash the rack(traditional break), trying to make a ball and are still penalized for not moving balls uptable? Giving the incoming player BIH even though you made a ball on the break while hitting the rack hard? How in the hell is that a good rule????
Also, when I was watching the World Pool Masters. they were not "soft" breaking but were still bound by the rule requiring 2(3?) balls past the head string. What a crock! So now you can smash the rack(traditional break), trying to make a ball and are still penalized for not moving balls uptable? Giving the incoming player BIH even though you made a ball on the break while hitting the rack hard? How in the hell is that a good rule????