Good point. Have to wonder why Wade Crane didn't mention that possibility in the article I saw. Does this render the Bill Cress solution without merit?wayne said:The obvious safety at this point is to take a foul yourself and leave the cueball where it is and now your opponent can't continue to take fouls if the 3 foul rule is in effect.
BillPorter said:Good point. Have to wonder why Wade Crane didn't mention that possibility in the article I saw. Does this render the Bill Cress solution without merit?
i need somethin said:4 rails to hit the 4 ball and hook him???
http://CueTable.com/P/?@2AALV1BbRh2...QRUh2kSSh1kbtx3kREn3kbRg1kcWN1kRtc1kRMf1uBfO@
BillPorter said:That was Diamond Bill's solution! Good job! It leaves your opponent in a tough spot because he has no reasonable offensive play and will have trouble playing you safe because of the position of the 3-ball.
Yes, I think that's a good point. He may be a bit flustered because he thought he had you stuck in a bad position only to find that now he seems to be in a bad position. Wouldn't be the first time that a one-pocket player missed taking an intention foul as the best alternative.woody_968 said:If he doesnt know to take the scratch then you may actually have the upper hand.
Woody
BillPorter said:Does this render the Bill Cress solution without merit?
Perhaps I wasn't as clear as I needed to be in my original message, sorry. I meant one needs to ensure the Q-ball doen't roll forward or off on the 1 ball so when the spotted ball (15 for example spots up for foul behind the Qball), the 2 ball can't be made. I do like your option of taking srcatch in off the corner leaving in the lips of the pocket.Neil said:The 15 is the ball spotted AFTER your shot.
BillPorter said:That was Diamond Bill's solution! Good job! It leaves your opponent in a tough spot because he has no reasonable offensive play and will have trouble playing you safe because of the position of the 3-ball.
" swStretchStyle=meet type="application/x-director" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/">This nifty little one-pocket move was described in an article by Wade Crane in a 1994 Pool & Billiard magazine. Crane said he got the move from an old friend, "Diamond Bill" Cress.">
In the table layout below, your pocket is at the upper right with your opponent's pocket at the lower right. It's your shot and even if you decide to take an intentional scratch, where do you shoot the cue ball? Is there a way to turn this situation around so that you put your opponent in trouble? BTW, the one ball is on the spot.
If no one comes up with a good answer, I'll post "Diamond Bill's" solution.
That's because the images were in an external app called "CueTable". The developer of CueTable lost interest in the project and his site, which was required to view the images, went away. That's one more example of why you shouldn't depend on third parties for images or features if they can be avoided.can't seem to pull up the image![]()
When I googled Pool and billiard magazine, March 1994The Wade Crane column in question is in the March 1994 issue of Pool & Billiard Magazine.
C'mon man, trying to mine a 16yr old thread?? Haven't you learned anything here???When I googled Pool and billiard magazine, March 1994
All I got was links to eBay to buy it
Do you have a link to the magazine or to the article Bob?