"Diamondizing" A Table Thread

So the Diamond has been modified to bank exactly like a Gold Crown? That's pretty much the last thing needed to make the table perfect or at least silence the whiners. I've been of the opinion that the Diamond did not bank wrong or played significantly different. Sure, it didn't play like a Gold Crown - it's NOT a Gold Crown. It takes very little to adjust to a Diamond. I think the old timers are just whiners that get angry at the slightest things they are made to adapt to. I've heard the same whining and condemnation when there were changes in cloth and all sorts of other aspects of the game.





Ah, one other thing, the pockets putting marks on the balls. Not a big deal. Still better than the plastic pockets that put plastic impact spots on the balls. Those are a pain to clean off. Builds up and balls play real clingy. Pick your poison.





Gold Crown had always been my favorite table. I own one. But they have become cheaper and cheaper in quality. Diamond is solid, made in America, priced better than a new GC, and just a better table in every way. Who said Americans can't compete with the Chinese/Brazillians?





Really, for the quality of the GCV and the origin of manufacture, it should be about a $2,000ish table give or take a couple of hundred. Brunswick is riding the name recognition and GC reputation and charging what I consider and outrageous amount. They have no justification to charge more than Diamond. Yet they do. That's because of the name recognition and an uninformed consumer base that creates a market where Brunswick can get that kind of money for their GCV.





The ProAm is just so solid. Give that table a good hip check and it doesn't even vibrate. Other tables vibrate and some shake just a little. Worst of all were the Gandy Big G's. Bumping into those with the front of your thigh when reaching over the table for a long stretch shot would cause balls to wobble on the table. That's not a result of bad installation. Every Gandy I've played on was like that. Unless every single Gandy I've played on was assembled and set up by hacks? I doubt it.







Critics of Greg Sullivan state that his push to change rules and specifications was to increase sales and business for his tables. Perhaps, but I disagree. The reason being is, Diamond gets it right when it comes to their specifications. They do tight pockets right. Brunswicks don't play right when their pockets are tightened UNLESS done by an expert like RKC or someone of that caliber who will extend the subrail and correct the pocket angles.





It's boring to watch the top pros play on 5" buckets. Silly. More kicks, jump shots, long range power cuts, banks, combos and other types of shots go more easily. More run outs. More packages.





A great example of that was the short life of the IPT. Both the tournaments and the qualifiers. Having watched many players practice on Gold Crown IV's....many were putting together big packages with regularity. The consensus among them was that 8-ball on 5" pocket 9 footers is "stupid" ...They sought out any ProAm they could find to practice on. Then when on the ProAm....all that wide open shootout play and packages stopped. Table slowed many of these players down. Only the elite were putting packages together. Another good example is the old Florida Tour which became the wider Seminole Tour. Semipros and lesser pros were on near equal ground with elite players on buckets. Because many of these stops were held in pool rooms with tables that had bucket pockets. As a result, lesser known semipro players would advance further. On Diamonds, the weaknesses in their game are more of a factor and they can't keep up. The big dogs make the outs and the shots on the Diamonds more often and more consistently. There are tens out thousands of A+ players across the country that can put together packages on 5" pocket Gold Crowns. Even on buckets the best still prevail most often. But the weaker are empowered.





That is why I believe that Greg Sullivan was not solely motivated by profit or promotion of his tables. He seems genuinely interested in improving the quality of equipment and the conditions of pool.





Brunswick is way behind the curve. Only with the GCV have they finally felt the pressure to offer a 4.5" pocket version. And it's not default, it's a select version. Regular GCV is 5" pockets. There was the Metro. Brunswick's answer to the ProAm which didn't really match up as a lower cost, easy to set up tournament table.





My next table will be a Diamond if I move. But my GC isn't problematic or lacking to warrant the upgrade any time soon. I remind myself that I have a table that most people wish they had and to appreciate it.



I believe the GCIV was also offered in a tournament addition.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
A blue label Diamond banks like a GC.I've had GCs & now have a blue label.Nothing banks as good as a good Gold Crown

I don't agree with this and I feel like your statement is contradicting itself.

I feel Diamonds and GCs bank very differently with me being partial to the GCs.
 
I don't agree with this and I feel like your statement is contradicting itself.



I feel Diamonds and GCs bank very differently with me being partial to the GCs.



Agreed but, the balls also come off the rails faster. I know it impossible but, I could swear I have watched balls gain speed after hitting a cushion. Probably just an illusion. The tables play different. That’s all I can tell you with certainty.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
Has anyone

Agreed but, the balls also come off the rails faster. I know it impossible but, I could swear I have watched balls gain speed after hitting a cushion. Probably just an illusion. The tables play different. That’s all I can tell you with certainty.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums

Saw an instructional video on the market where they use a Diamond table??I own one & love it But they bank WAY different than a Gold Crown...Compare a three railer in da corner?which goes truer?
 
I don't agree with this and I feel like your statement is contradicting itself.

I feel Diamonds and GCs bank very differently with me being partial to the GCs.

I have a GC4 and one rail banks are almost identical to most of the blue labels I play on. I have played on a few blues that bank shorter and I’m not sure why. Two and three railers are slightly different. The Diamond pockets are superior to GC’s.
 
Nobody would be having this discussion if it wasn’t for the fact that the tables play different.

What gets me is that the Bruswick table has been the standard for the professionals and amateurs alike in tournaments, pool rooms, and bowling alleys. It’s what made pool the game it once was and is. Yet, I hear the argument that a diamond plays better. Based on what exactly? The argument is made back and forth. I say football played on grass is the way the game was meant to be played. Artificial turf changes the game. So does changing the tables of our loved sport.

This can be argued for 10 years and it will. I will be a GC guy for life. I play diamonds. I don’t care for them. The balls go in. The table banks. You can play pool on it in all variations. Is it the same game as on a GC. No it isn’t.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
Don't forget that Diamond tables have two kinds of cushions, the Black Diamond rubber and the Artemis rubber. They install the Artemis on the 9 footers only.

I would not base my comparison unless I was certain I knew what was under the cloth. In other words, unless I or a friend owned the table, or it is a relatively new table in the pool room.

These two cushions do play different.


Gold Crowns play radically different from each other because Gold Crowns have 5 generations of table, most of which have been around decades. Meaning that many of them have had cushions changed at least once. Different generations of tables that have different build quality and designs.

How and who did the cushion work will make a difference. Also, what kind of cushions they use. Brunswick has slightly different cushions on their oldest tables. Not all K-55 is the same.

I'm sure RKC can expand on this.

Also, what is the age of the cloth? Newer cloth plays longer and the angle is wider on 3 rail banks. Did you all compare or take into account the type and age of cloth when comparing the tables?


So it is very difficult to get apples to apples comparison. When you compare two brands, you need to compare their "factory" versions. Not examples that have been hacked on by various table mechanics for 20+ years.


I owned a brand new Gold Crown III with factory installed genuine super speed cushions. I shot on a 2 week old, recently installed at the time red label Diamond at a local pool room. Yes, the banks were different. Did the same on a blue label many years later - and it's essentially the same to a GC relative to the red labels which were noticeably different.


You will never get exact. But then again, that is pointless. You will never get exact across the same make and model of Gold Crown either.

You can get very close when:

A pool room has all the same generation of Gold Crowns all installed at the same time.

And that pool room uses the same table mechanic for years, who is also competent.

This way, they all get new cloth and rails the same time, and the guy doing it does it the same across the tables in that room.

Usually, a table mechanic will source the same cushions for all the tables. There's a lot of knock-off or aftermarket rubber cushions out there...of various and dubious quality. To make matters worse, pool room owners like to save in every way they can - so most older tables are not getting premium cushions.

The tables in that room will have their own play "style" but should be close to one another.
 
Don't forget that Diamond tables have two kinds of cushions, the Black Diamond rubber and the Artemis rubber. They install the Artemis on the 9 footers only.



I would not base my comparison unless I was certain I knew what was under the cloth. In other words, unless I or a friend owned the table, or it is a relatively new table in the pool room.



These two cushions do play different.





Gold Crowns play radically different from each other because Gold Crowns have 5 generations of table, most of which have been around decades. Meaning that many of them have had cushions changed at least once. Different generations of tables that have different build quality and designs.



How and who did the cushion work will make a difference. Also, what kind of cushions they use. Brunswick has slightly different cushions on their oldest tables. Not all K-55 is the same.



I'm sure RKC can expand on this.



Also, what is the age of the cloth? Newer cloth plays longer and the angle is wider on 3 rail banks. Did you all compare or take into account the type and age of cloth when comparing the tables?





So it is very difficult to get apples to apples comparison. When you compare two brands, you need to compare their "factory" versions. Not examples that have been hacked on by various table mechanics for 20+ years.





I owned a brand new Gold Crown III with factory installed genuine super speed cushions. I shot on a 2 week old, recently installed at the time red label Diamond at a local pool room. Yes, the banks were different. Did the same on a blue label many years later - and it's essentially the same to a GC relative to the red labels which were noticeably different.





You will never get exact. But then again, that is pointless. You will never get exact across the same make and model of Gold Crown either.



You can get very close when:



A pool room has all the same generation of Gold Crowns all installed at the same time.



And that pool room uses the same table mechanic for years, who is also competent.



This way, they all get new cloth and rails the same time, and the guy doing it does it the same across the tables in that room.



Usually, a table mechanic will source the same cushions for all the tables. There's a lot of knock-off or aftermarket rubber cushions out there...of various and dubious quality. To make matters worse, pool room owners like to save in every way they can - so most older tables are not getting premium cushions.



The tables in that room will have their own play "style" but should be close to one another.



So begs the question....what happens as these Diamonds age? Will the same penny pinching owners decide to save a few Nickle’s on cheaper cushions and cloth? It’s an endless cycle.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
So begs the question....what happens as these Diamonds age? Will the same penny pinching owners decide to save a few Nickle’s on cheaper cushions and cloth? It’s an endless cycle.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums

To Diamond's credit, they use Artemis cushions on their 9-footers.
They last a long time .
They probably outlast most pool halls

Brunswick really messed up when they moved rubber maker from the US to overseas. Quality went down so Diamond opted for Championship then Artemis.

Super Speed is better now but they still , for a time, known to get hard really fast .
 
Agreed but, the balls also come off the rails faster. I know it impossible but, I could swear I have watched balls gain speed after hitting a cushion. Probably just an illusion. The tables play different. That’s all I can tell you with certainty.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums

Think about it once, if the ball came off of the rail faster than it went into the rail once you hit a ball hard enough for a lag it would never stop rolling. It would just keep going faster and faster every time it came off of another cushion. Pretty soon you lag shot would be going 13 rails!!!!:yikes::yikes::yikes:
 
Think about it once, if the ball came off of the rail faster than it went into the rail once you hit a ball hard enough for a lag it would never stop rolling. It would just keep going faster and faster every time it came off of another cushion. Pretty soon you lag shot would be going 13 rails!!!!:yikes::yikes::yikes:



I really think people are retarded these days. I have been playing pool for 45 years. That’s why I said I know it’s impossible. Read the full sentence don’t just look on idiot tube.

But for your idiotic information it is absolutely possible for a ball to come off the rail faster if you hit it with spin although it obviously won’t maintain that amount of sped probably past the second rail.

Learn to respond to things you actually have some knowledge about. BTW where do you play because I want that game.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
To Diamond's credit, they use Artemis cushions on their 9-footers.

They last a long time .

They probably outlast most pool halls



Brunswick really messed up when they moved rubber maker from the US to overseas. Quality went down so Diamond opted for Championship then Artemis.



Super Speed is better now but they still , for a time, known to get hard really fast .



Example?


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
Example? ...
In this area examples of lousy Brunswick cushions going hard like pottery were quite common. Around 1995 four or five rooms opened around here with GC3s. Sections of the cushions started going hard soon. One room eventually had to replace about 60 cushion sections on about 22 tables as they died one by one.

At the other end of the spectrum, a table mechanic told me that he has seen 1930s Brunswicks with the original rubber and still playable. I had a GC1.5 that probably had original rubber that was still fine in 2006.

If I were replacing rubber on my own table now, I would never choose Brunswick. It's a little disappointing when you shoot a lag shot at good speed and the cue ball comes back only as far as the side pockets.
 
In this area examples of lousy Brunswick cushions going hard like pottery were quite common. Around 1995 four or five rooms opened around here with GC3s. Sections of the cushions started going hard soon. One room eventually had to replace about 60 cushion sections on about 22 tables as they died one by one.

At the other end of the spectrum, a table mechanic told me that he has seen 1930s Brunswicks with the original rubber and still playable. I had a GC1.5 that probably had original rubber that was still fine in 2006.

If I were replacing rubber on my own table now, I would never choose Brunswick. It's a little disappointing when you shoot a lag shot at good speed and the cue ball comes back only as far as the side pockets.



The cushions and the hardness for a short period of time have been discussed and explained. Read up on the threads. It has been discussed and explained.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
In this area examples of lousy Brunswick cushions going hard like pottery were quite common. Around 1995 four or five rooms opened around here with GC3s. Sections of the cushions started going hard soon. One room eventually had to replace about 60 cushion sections on about 22 tables as they died one by one.

At the other end of the spectrum, a table mechanic told me that he has seen 1930s Brunswicks with the original rubber and still playable. I had a GC1.5 that probably had original rubber that was still fine in 2006.

If I were replacing rubber on my own table now, I would never choose Brunswick. It's a little disappointing when you shoot a lag shot at good speed and the cue ball comes back only as far as the side pockets.



Also as of yesterday hit 3 three long rails on my GCV. Granted it takes warp 9. Generally I get about 2.75 on normal strokes.

Now I never tried it on a diamond but, I will.




Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
The cushions and the hardness for a short period of time have been discussed and explained. Read up on the threads. It has been discussed and explained.
It was not a short period around here. Brunswick offered no relief. Cushions are still failing. Maybe people are acting on old info but some around here will not use Brunswick rubber unless they are forced to.
 
Last edited:
... hit 3 three long rails on my GCV. ...
What does "hit 3 three long rails" mean? Do you mean you hit the far end rail three times while shooting straight up and down the table. I think most people would say something like "I got five lengths."
 
Back
Top