Distance of V to Fixed CCB

Thanks ATC.

You're more new to the 'discussions' than I am.

You've already courageously said that it's NOT 'an objective aiming system'

The point is if it is not objective but instead subjective, then the pivots too could very well be subjective in how they are being applied.

If there is nothing objective that takes one to the different physical positions using the same visual & one is making a sweep instead of a manual pivot...

Then how does one KNOW that they are making a 'sweep' that is truly equal to the 1/2 tip pivot & NOT a variance thereof?

Once you get the CTE & whatever else line 'combined' that is a fixed line & we all know that the 5 different parallel shots with the same distance between the balls can NOT all be made from the same line...

then one has to either move onto a different line (& there is nothing that is objective that dictates that) OR...one has to VARY to 'pivot' or the sweep.

Variances of pivot yields differences.

Best 2 Ya,
Rick

They can and are made and you've seen video proof as well as testimonies about that.
STOP POSTING FALSE INFORMATION.
 
I can bake an Apple pie but not as good as the local bakery can. Think i'll go with the experienced and knowledgeable one.

And someone eating the pie that does not even know a thing about baking can eat it & be the judge if one pie had sweet apples in it & the other one had sour apples in it.

That's the thing.

One does NOT need to know anything about "IT" to be able to make the determination as to it's subjectivity vs the inaccurate description of 'an objective aiming system'.

If there is nothing objective that dictates the setting of the cue on the actual shot line then it is a subjective based method just as all of the other methods.
 
Don't know what ATC knows or where he learned. Stan teaches one and judging from other students replies he only teaches one way.

Well I am fairly sure that ATC is learning from the DVDs.

Variances of pivots yield differences.
 
Last edited:
What you are trying to infer is blatantly false.

Here go the diversionary games.

I'm not playing.

I've made my point for rational individuals to use to make their own determinations.

It was YOU that first used the phrase 'blatantly false' & my post was in rebuttal to that.

Variance of pivots yield differences.
 
Last edited:
They can and are made and you've seen video proof as well as testimonies about that.
STOP POSTING FALSE INFORMATION.

Exactly WHAT in my post would YOU consider "false information".

More games of evasion & diversion.

Variances of pivots yield differences.
 
Exactly WHAT in my post would YOU consider "false information".

More games of evasion & diversion.

Variances of pivots yield differences.

Pretty much every thing you type about CTE would be considered false. You don't want to learn it, you don't want to use it, all you want to do is nitpick like a little kid and bully people on here. You spread more false info on here than anyone in the history of the forums. Go back to NPR and post more of your posts there that are supposed to be bannable offenses, but you get to skate on the rules because the mods like looking at them.
 
Pretty much every thing you type about CTE would be considered false. You don't want to learn it, you don't want to use it, all you want to do is nitpick like a little kid and bully people on here. You spread more false info on here than anyone in the history of the forums. Go back to NPR and post more of your posts there that are supposed to be bannable offenses, but you get to skate on the rules because the mods like looking at them.


Neil, nothing gets through to his addled brain especially something that makes sense and has been told to him 500 times.

Here are the two best posts EVER made about Rick:

QUOTE: Bob Jewett - " If you really believe this, you are an idiot when it comes to pool. Do you really believe this?"

"I don't like idiots. I don't like them a lot. Sometimes I let that show."


NOTHING MORE NEEDS TO BE SAID OR POSTED BACK TO HIM OTHER THAN THIS.
 
Nothing but the same tactics with no substantive on topic rebuttal.

Just more talking AROUND matters & quoting out of context & attacking the individual.

These type of activities should be very telling to neutral parties.

I had thought that a decent discussion might be started & had, but the same "cast of characters' has showed up with nonsense, so that is now completely OUT of the question.

Variances of pivot will yield differences.

As to the out of context quote...

Mr. Jewett did NOT explain how swiping AIR can affect the ball. I think he too took something out of context or there was a complete miscommunication.

Y'all enjoy the 'silence'.
 
Knowledge of the Mafia vs. Knowledge of CTE

Only in your head, Rick....only in your head. :eek:

Can we say the same concerning knowledge of a swipe stroke?




That's almost like the Mafia saying that only the Mafia can make claims for or against the Mafia.

That's part of the problem. That's not how such matters work.

There is no need to know all of the specific inner workings of the Mafia for ANYONE to make a judgement on the morals of the Mafia....

Just as one does not even have to know what a pool table is in order to make the proper judgement as to the subjectivity of CTE.
 
Did he ever answer?

The first quote might make for a good tag line.



Neil, nothing gets through to his addled brain especially something that makes sense and has been told to him 500 times.

Here are the two best posts EVER made about Rick:

QUOTE: Bob Jewett - " If you really believe this, you are an idiot when it comes to pool. Do you really believe this?"

"I don't like idiots. I don't like them a lot. Sometimes I let that show."


NOTHING MORE NEEDS TO BE SAID OR POSTED BACK TO HIM OTHER THAN THIS.
 
Nothing but the same tactics with no substantive on topic rebuttal.

Just more talking AROUND matters & quoting out of context & attacking the individual.

These type of activities should be very telling to neutral parties.

I had thought that a decent discussion might be started & had, but the same "cast of characters' has showed up with nonsense, so that is now completely OUT of the question.

Variances of pivot will yield differences.

As to the out of context quote...

Mr. Jewett did NOT explain how swiping AIR can affect the ball. I think he too took something out of context or there was a complete miscommunication.

Y'all enjoy the 'silence'.

Here are the two best posts EVER made about Rick:

QUOTE: Bob Jewett - " If you really believe this, you are an idiot when it comes to pool. Do you really believe this?"

"I don't like idiots. I don't like them a lot. Sometimes I let that show."


NOTHING MORE NEEDS TO BE SAID OR POSTED BACK TO HIM OTHER THAN THIS.


LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT 'SILENCE' YOU PROMISED MR. NEAR GENIUS.
 
Nothing but the same tactics with no substantive on topic rebuttal.
More lies from you. You were given the answers, but, as usual, you dismiss them and then claim there was no rebuttal.
Just more talking AROUND matters & quoting out of context & attacking the individual.
You mean like you did in your very first post in this thread?
These type of activities should be very telling to neutral parties.
They are, except to you. How many have to tell you you don't have a clue about pool before you finally understand it?
I had thought that a decent discussion might be started & had, but the same "cast of characters' has showed up with nonsense, so that is now completely OUT of the question.
Another lie. You never had any intention whatsoever of having a discussion. You made a declarative statement and expect everyone to agree with you.You were told that you are once again wrong, why you are wrong, and where else you can go to get even more information. You dismiss all of it and keep making your uniformed declarative statement.
Variances of pivot will yield differences.

As to the out of context quote...

Mr. Jewett did NOT explain how swiping AIR can affect the ball. I think he too took something out of context or there was a complete miscommunication.

Y'all enjoy the 'silence'.

Looks like Bob was correct. Why would anyone bother to explain that?
 
Pretty much every thing you type about CTE would be considered false. You don't want to learn it, you don't want to use it, all you want to do is nitpick like a little kid and bully people on here. You spread more false info on here than anyone in the history of the forums. Go back to NPR and post more of your posts there that are supposed to be bannable offenses, but you get to skate on the rules because the mods like looking at them.

I've said many times....I don't care which one of you is "right".
I care that people act civilly and follow the forums rules.

You keep insisting things and calling me out. this is at your own risk.
 
Back
Top