Sean is fine, and like many long time contributors to AZB, he spends more time interacting on Facebook than here.
He and his wife vacationed near here last month and I got to shoot a little with him.
No, aiming didn't come up in the discussion.
Do you use an aiming system or go by feel?
- Thread starter SamLambert
- Start date
Sean is fine, and like many long time contributors to AZB, he spends more time interacting on Facebook than here.
He and his wife vacationed near here last month and I got to shoot a little with him.
No, aiming didn't come up in the discussion.
1 1/8" from the contact point is the math behind the ghost ball .
Same with the stroking line on no English shots.
Diagrams for CTE would be great . Sorry, so many MISREPRESENT CTE .
And from what Stan says, there are very few QUALIFIED TO TEACH IT.
It's like every other person has a different expertise on CTE but are not qualified to teach it .
Vertical lines showing what the visuals and processes are would be very beneficial.
The first Pro 1 DVD was not all that clear to many.
A book or manual would be better for a lot of people.
Simple response. That's NOT how an objective system would work.
You seem to want to detach the subconscious mind from the conscious mind's INTENTIONS & DESIRES.
I would trust my subconscious mind before I would would trust my consciousness.
Last edited:
No quite so. I was delving into John's thinking regarding the issue as different things have been said at different times.
That was a question searching for clarification.
The fact that seemingly many on the CTE side seem to think that they are omniscient & can read the minds & intentions of others is what results in wasted time & effort.
I am starting to think that that might be an intentional tactic & perhaps even a coordinated one since it seems to be so prevalent on that side.
Best Wishes.
Last edited:
So now Stan decides what will or may be done or not by others?
That sort of indicates that you are a member following a cult leader.
Best Wishes.
Why don't we just all stop and wait for Stan's book?
A mischaracterization on your part with your slant on matters.
Anyone can read all of the 'arguments' from both sides & make their own determinations.
There is no need for any video as video would prove nothing either way when it comes down to whether or not one's subjectivity is employed or not.
ONLY intelligent critical thinking & explanation can do that & I am sure it has & is influencing thousands if not tens of thousands here on AZB.
Best Wishes.
Another mischaracterization on your part with your slant on matters.
Are you questioning the physics regarding what is commonly known as Ghost Ball?
Best Wishes.
Thanks for the update. I'm glad he's well.
Exactly, cloth type, humidity, speed, ball condition, chalk on cueball, etc.....are some variables that can affect the most well aimed and well stroked shot.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
You don't even understand "probably" lol.
Cult, great fall back from the nonusers.
It is Stan's system, he knows more about it than anyone.
whoooooo, you are the one telling US how we are making shots. It's you that THINKS we are doing things we say we aren't. You are the definition of one who thinks they can read minds.
I think you know, as well as most good players. that it is effected by the speed of shot & also the fullness or thinness of the hit.
That is one of Duckie Greg's pet peeves. What actual speed of shot?
So... are you suggesting that there really can be no real system that takes one to the shot line given the above?
Or... like PJ likes to say, not one small enough to be practical in use?
Stay Well.
Whoa, big fella.
Your reading/posting audience on this forum right now is 10, including you and me. There are less than 200 reading and posting on the Main Forum.
I hope you didn't come here for the exposure. We're not shaping public opinion here.
pj
chgo
Damn, we got caught boys.....Rick you figured it out. Each morning the CTE marketing group has a meeting where we discuss who we will target and what strategy we will employ. You should see the gannt chart we have and the names on it.
Or
Perhaps we all say similar things about CTE because each of us has separately had similar experiences during our table time with CTE.
You pick the option you think sounds more fun.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
I think it's more of a prediction based on current knowledge.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
You overestimate your reach on azb concerning this topic. Not that many stick around to read your novels set on repeat. What they do do however is watch the linked videos.
So again, step up your video game if you really want to make a difference. On here you are simply on a small merry go round.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
What physics are those? Do you mean the geometry? The calculus? Or the metaphysics involved in imagining a fully formed ball correctly adjusted for contact induced throw?
Yes I am certainly questioning that if that's what you mean.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
I understand 'probably'. I also understand the implications & made the connection to why Stan said that the math will 'probably' never be done.
He implied that it's because he says it is a visual system & he seems to think that that would preclude math explaining it.
What it seems some do not understand or perhaps just do not want to face it or have it out is that 'math' is man made & not really a real science like physics & others. It was made by man as a tool to explain the real sciences.
Science governs even a 'visual system' & man can use or devise math to explain it.
AND... can some one please define exactly what is 'visual intelligence'?
Intelligence is not a visual thing.
As I've explained before, the image on the retina of our eye from our VISION is upside down just as it is with a camera & it is one's brain that basically configures it so that we are able to perform without a conscious intellectual process needing to be done to reach 'up for down' so to speak.
It, the math, is basically there as Poolplaya9 said. It just says differently than what Y'all want it to say.
As I mentioned to John. One can not start with a false premise & then come out with The Truth.
Best Wishes.