Efren foul call - Was Ref correct?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm8Y1SBzCd4#t=1283

Was this shot a foul? Timestamp is 21:23 if the link does not take you directly there. I think it was a good hit by where the CB went but I'm not certain.

Personally, I think the cue-ball's path suggests it was a foul. That said, it's really hard to tell given the quality of the video. I could imagine a scenario where that might be a good hit but hard to say.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm8Y1SBzCd4#t=1283

Was this shot a foul? Timestamp is 21:23 if the link does not take you directly there. I think it was a good hit by where the CB went but I'm not certain.
Tough call.

But with the aid of youtube and multiple replays, I would have to say that it was NOT a foul. I base my opinion predominantly on the path and speed of the 5 ball. If Efren did hit the 5 first, then it looks like he cut the 5 at >90 degrees. Assuming that Efren wanted to pocket the 5 in the corner, it's pretty tough to overcut the shot by that amount, and especially at the speed at which the 5 traveled.

The other reason I think it was not a foul is because Efren didn't think so.

But man, I certainly don't blame the ref for getting that one wrong.
 
Tough call.

But with the aid of youtube and multiple replays, I would have to say that it was NOT a foul. I base my opinion predominantly on the path and speed of the 5 ball. If Efren did hit the 5 first, then it looks like he cut the 5 at >90 degrees. Assuming that Efren wanted to pocket the 5 in the corner, it's pretty tough to overcut the shot by that amount, and especially at the speed at which the 5 traveled.

The other reason I think it was not a foul is because Efren didn't think so.

But man, I certainly don't blame the ref for getting that one wrong.

Yes, now that you mention this, I fully agree. The path the 5 took was greater than 90 deg, and he barely hit the CB speed wise to get the 5 anywhere near the pocket if the 5 was hit first. Good observation.
 
Foul or not we need to accept the decision the ref makes on a call and not belittle the ref after that.
 
Good hit all day. The cue ball moves straight to end rail off side of 5.
Correct.

If the CB hit the 3 last, then the CB would have to initially travel on the tangent line of the 3 ball before the forward roll took over. But you don't see a hint of curve/deviation in the CB path after contact(s).
 
Foul or not we need to accept the decision the ref makes on a call and not belittle the ref after that.
No one is belittling the ref. If anything, I admire that he made a call immediately and authoritatively, even though he got it wrong.
 
I agree with takeitdown; good hit based on the action of the cueball


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
No one is belittling the ref. If anything, I admire that he made a call immediately and authoritatively, even though he got it wrong.

Agree. I just wanted to know if it was good or bad:) This match was almost 30 yrs ago!
 
No one is belittling the ref. If anything, I admire that he made a call immediately and authoritatively, even though he got it wrong.

Keith saying that he'll take it even though he thought it was a good hit is not showing respect for the ref's call. Best is just to take it and don't say anything.
 
Keith saying that he'll take it even though he thought it was a good hit is not showing respect for the ref's call. Best is just to take it and don't say anything.

Is it important to respect a ref's call if it is wrong? I'm not so sure it is :D

It's very useful to have instant video replay available to the ref for such an occasion.

Does anyone remember the World Pool Championship where Bustamante fouled on a shot that combo'd in the 9-ball for a win? Video replay was used there. Even with it, there was a lot of contention and drama, though I feel the correct call was made.
 
Based on the where the 5 ball hit the side rail IMHO it was definitely a good hit.
Listing to Keith he also thought so.

dale

I have watched this over 20 times now .. And I will officially do the flip flop, I now think the hit was good, but man that is very close.

I also agree a great job by the ref regardless if he called it good or foul. He has a split second to make that call and he did it with authority.
 
Is it important to respect a ref's call if it is wrong? I'm not so sure it is :D

It's very useful to have instant video replay available to the ref for such an occasion.

Does anyone remember the World Pool Championship where Bustamante fouled on a shot that combo'd in the 9-ball for a win? Video replay was used there. Even with it, there was a lot of contention and drama, though I feel the correct call was made.

The ref is human. All he can do is make the best call he can with the information he has available. They will never be right all the time, but a quick decisive call keeps control of the match.

If available, I am all for instant reply in slo-mo to get it right. That would be the nuts.
 
If the ref didn't blow that call Efren probably would have won that match. Instead, he lost 9-8.

Can't really blame the ref though, my knee jerk reaction was to think it was a foul. I had to watch the replay about 5 times to change my mind.
 
Back
Top