There are 2 BSCPs per se in the Philippines...
#1 Headed by Arturo Ilagan
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=136995
#2 Headed by Sebastian Chua
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=140662
#1 recognized by POC (Philippine Olympic Committee), while #2 is not.
http://www.olympic.ph/
http://www.olympic.ph/nsas/billiards.html
#2 recognized by WPA, while #1 is not.
http://www.wpa-pool.com/
http://www.wpa-pool.com/index.asp?content=member_list
(Under APBU, select the country "Philippines". It still shows Ernesto Fajardo. WPA should update it's info.)
Both claiming to be the legit BSCP.
Well, it "seems" as if the one that is recognized and listed on the Phillipine Olympic Committee's website should be the one that is official. However things are never as they seem with all the accusations that the POC has acted outside it's boundaries to "force" an election which was held without the presence of the "former" officers of the BSCP.
One should ask - in fact one will ask - the WPA president about this and inquire as to what criteria a national organization must fulfill in order to be officially recognized as the national member of the WPA.
What has transpired in court over these issues of two groups claiming to hold the power of the BSCP? Who has the charter? Who holds the banks accounts of the BSCP? What is the APBU's official position here?
According to Ian Anderson when the WPA had to make a decision as to "which" BSCP to recognize they went with some court decision that supposedly invalidated the election that was held where Ilagan was elected as president. I don't know at this point what court decision he is referring to but he has said that whatever group prevails in court will be recognized by the WPA.
Now, having said that we are back to MONEY.
If you are the WPA and you have an upcoming event, the first on your calendar billed as a "world tour" event, then you certainly have to think twice before you discredit the organization and people you have worked with three years in a row on three major events in the face of what seemed like a coup election held without the officers of the existing organization present. In the WPA's position, they don't know know WHO is in the right so better to play it safe and continue working with the ones you know. Not to say that the WPA wasn't looking at the sanctioning fee and wanting to insure that the event was held at all. I am sure that this played a major part in it.
The thing is that the players were told by the WPA that ALL THEY HAD TO DO was be a member in good standing of the BSCP, that the WPA recognized. This is the interim solution that the WPA came up with. All they had to do was sign the form, pay the dues and be a member. Not capitulate. Ian Anderson has told me that the WPA wasn't going to stand for any shenanigans - we can't know if that is true or not now since the BMPAP didn't allow their players to retain their BSCP membership officially to satsify the WPA.
That's what this is all about. The WPA held open the door for the players to be able to play.
I will say this. The fact that the WPA IS tied up with the promoters who also HAPPEN to be officers in the governing body stinks. It is a conflict of interest when the governing body is also the promoter. Unfortunately this is standard fare in pool. I think it puts the WPA in a bad position as the sanctioning body to be embroiled with a national member through the promotional company of the Chairman of that national member.
And this is what I mean about there being far more to the situation that most of realize. Especially those of us who outside and far away. I brought you some of Ian Anderson's perspective. Perhaps with time and shining a brighter light on all of this there can finally be some resolution.
I hope that this is the last year with such conflict in the billiard industry.
Frankly I don't understand why a bunch of otherwise intelligent people can't figure it out. And I don't mean just as relates to the Philippine situation.
I think it really blows that Efren and any great player has to miss paydays due to politics.