scorpionjohnny
Registered
who would win?
in:
one pocket
8 ball
9 ball
rotation
straight pool
carom
etc...
in:
one pocket
8 ball
9 ball
rotation
straight pool
carom
etc...
scorpionjohnny said:who would win?
in:
one pocket
8 ball
9 ball
rotation
straight pool
carom
etc...
my vote is efren in all games. who knows how many balls efren can run. plus the main reason is he is playing every day and mike is notscorpionjohnny said:who would win?
in:
one pocket
8 ball
9 ball
rotation
straight pool
carom
etc...
JoeyInCali said:Sigel wins straight-pool in his prime.
9-ball too probably ( Efren beat 5 in a row before he retired iirc ).
8-ball, rotation and carom go to Efren.
scorpionjohnny said:who would win?
in:
one pocket
8 ball
9 ball
rotation
straight pool
carom
etc...
Matt_24 said:In "their" heyday (both at prime).
8 Ball - Sigel
9 Ball - Sigel
Rotation - Efren (I doubt Sigel played it)
Straight Pool - Sigel
Ask Efren who HIS favorite player IS. Oh...Sigel.
Matt_24 said:.Segal was quoted as saying something simuliar to these words"Once your 35 in pool, your over the hill.
Guess guys like Irving Crane, Buddy Hall, and Nick Varner proved that wrong, eh? Nick Varner started peaking at 38, and has won a World Championship in EVERY discipline of "pocket" billiards.
-
mark tadd said:id say that was a great guess but definetly been proven wrong. im almost 40 and i may decide to try to prove it wrong again![]()
![]()
![]()
LastTwo said:Efren beat Mike 5 times in a row or is it the other way around?
my opinion differs...Fred Agnir said:The other way around. In the 80's and early 90's, Efren had the habit of making it to finals or semifinal matches and lose to Sigel (or whomever else was in the finals). Sigel something over 75% (or something even higher) of all his finals matches, whereas Efren never seemed to win more than a handful in ten years.
9-ball - If it's prime vs. prime, Sigel already beat Efren when both were in their prime in 9-ball, so, IMO, that's put to bed.
14.1 - Sigel. Not even close
one-pocket - Efren, but Sigel in his later years when he had pretty much retired also won a major one-pocket event. So, it's not that far apart, prime vs. prime.
8-ball - both have world championships. In Sigel's prime, he simply was the best player on the planet. 8-ball was an easy game for him as well.
Rotation - Efren. I doubt Sigel paid much attention to Rotation.
I feel sorry for the people who got into pool after Sigel got bored with it. He was *that* good. Efren is easily the best all-around player, but he didn't have the fire power that Sigel had. Sigel was the best offensive player, as well as being the best defensive player. And he seemed to have the most luck going his way. And because of that, he always made the right decision since he had both offense and defense to work with. We'e talking about a guy who dominated his era, an era filled with hall-of-fame legends who were in their prime
Fred
scorpionjohnny said:my opinion differs...
in 9 ball...first, it doesnt mean that if you beat someone you're already better than that person, because when they were both in their prime, the both of them beat each other a lot, and between two super players... basically its luck and the conditioning will really matter.