Fargo Rate Manipulation Pro Tips

*
 

Attachments

  • ec09d9f0-e47e-4cac-9819-83cd94afabd4_text.gif
    ec09d9f0-e47e-4cac-9819-83cd94afabd4_text.gif
    802.3 KB · Views: 21
You can take a year off and you FR can increase or decrease also, trying to stay within a few points of a certain FR can be risky. Win one of those tournaments that you were sandbagging for and you are screwed if they report.

I started in Fargo in 2019 I think, sometime around 2022/2023 I was at 630+ with just over 200 games in the system and I stopped playing. Since then I have played 4 or 5 small tournaments and did well (couple of 2nd and 3rd place finishes). My current FR is 617. It fluctuated quite a bit for the first 1.5/2 years but it's been stuck at 617 for at least the last year or so.
 
ratings are really for leagues and small honest tournaments. when the money starts to get interesting then expect for people to game the system.

only if the t.d. would ban those he feels are not honest about their rating, can it work for bigger money.

if you are lower rated in your class then expect to have no chance.
welcome to the real world.
 
ratings are really for leagues and small honest tournaments. when the money starts to get interesting then expect for people to game the system.

only if the t.d. would ban those he feels are not honest about their rating, can it work for bigger money.

if you are lower rated in your class then expect to have no chance.
welcome to the real world.

The big money tournaments of this kind require the players to make their Fargo games “public”, so the TD (and anyone else) can look at all of their games to look for evidence or of dumping. They also require a pretty high level of robustness (which makes the rating less sensitive to a few dumping attempts).

So if a player is close to the handicap limit and has a bunch of suspect losses to lower players, the TD can just deny entry.

It’s not perfect but it is something.
 
they dont have to dump just simply always play way below their best speed in all fargo rated events. then shoot better when the cash is bigger.
 
Simple, 💰💰
I have a regular game with a guy who is to my estimate, a 725-750 rated player surmised by comparing his game to other players I have games with, that have a legit rating. His on the book rating is 596. He plays in a league 1 night a week and dumps, plays in cheap entry local tournaments and dumps, all to keep that rating below 600.

He travels regularly out of town to play in capped tournaments all over, Vegas, Alabama, just got back from Canada yesterday, played me today, and is flying out tomorrow to Indiana. There’s a whole group of people that do it, constantly staring at each other at the same capped tournaments all over. He told me today it’s gotten to where they play each other in action in off hours at the events. It’s the new hustle, he does quite well.
There’s big money at the Iron City events. An honest person with an honest handicap has very little chance from what I’ve heard.
A player's FARGO rating is never perfectly aligned with how a player might play at any given moment.
All it takes is a few months off (or any relative meaningful hiatus for that player), not feeling well on a particular day, or even not playing in FARGO-rated events for years YET practicing and improving and playing higher than one's listed FARGO.

FARGO is not perfect, but no system is.
Nonetheless, FARGO does a damn good job of equalizing players' algorithms across the board.
Im a prime example of this. I beat a 760 once and lost to a 503 once. Short races are a real crap shoot.

However the system is designed, there are players that are professional fixers. I remember back in the day when I joined APA I was a 7 and had to play a 5. The 5 gave me the 8 ball gambling and I had no chance to beat him in the pool room.
 
The big money tournaments of this kind require the players to make their Fargo games “public”, so the TD (and anyone else) can look at all of their games to look for evidence or of dumping. ...
I've heard one of those capped, high-stakes events do not report results to FargoRate. I was told that the TD and his friends thought that would be counterproductive. ;) Seems to me that it's best to steer clear of tournaments that don't report. Unless, of course, you somehow find yourself 100 points underrated, somehow.
 
... . I remember back in the day when I joined APA I was a 7 and had to play a 5. The 5 gave me the 8 ball gambling and I had no chance to beat him in the pool room.
Around here there was (and maybe still is) a handicapped nine ball league. Years ago in the room where I played, there was a pair of players who played every week, religiously, you might say, as if on a mission. Every week, they both lost two matches and went home.

At the big, quarterly handicapped money-added event, the TD/LO told them the equivalent of: "550, eh? You guys can play at 700 if you want to enter." They lost their religion at that point.
 
I've heard one of those capped, high-stakes events do not report results to FargoRate. I was told that the TD and his friends thought that would be counterproductive. ;) Seems to me that it's best to steer clear of tournaments that don't report. Unless, of course, you somehow find yourself 100 points underrated, somehow.

Could be. The ones I have seen do report to Fargo but perhaps there is one or more that don’t.

If the tournament is on digital pool, you can actually see if they did select the report option. See example below.
c79a8b1dc5cac41e883061194ad2f6a7.jpg



IMO no tournament should use Fargo as an entry cap or to determine handicapping should not report to Fargo.
 
dumping is losing the match on purpose, so as to dump your backers money or the side action money.

not playing your true speed is called stalling, or playing on the lemon or lemoning.

since fargo tracks all your racks and not just win loss then a good player can still keep his rating lower by winning. but only by a game or two against weak players.
 
since fargo tracks all your racks and not just win loss then a good player can still keep his rating lower by winning. but only by a game or two against weak players.

This is true and a bit harder to catch. But if a 600 player is consistently beating 400s by like 9-7, an astute TD will notice something is wrong. The occasional result like that can happen, but you’d expect a lot of 9-2 type scores with that skill gap.
 
Back
Top