Sir, I am only going by your continuous subliminal text messages and comments attempting to drag me into your world of agony and frustration with repeated promises of something greater. Sounds like a cult to me.
There is no greater joy than nailing a 3 railer center pocket and swinging the rock two rails into the stack, breaking out a few more balls and then running 8 and out![]()
There is no greater joy than nailing a 3 railer center pocket and swinging the rock two rails into the stack, breaking out a few more balls and then running 8 and out![]()
one pocket is not for everyone, but it is one of the few games that you can obtain a lot of knowledge by simply watching others play it.
I was in a tournament a few days ago and some new faces showed up to play. I was showing them a few things on stance, bridge, stoke, and had a thought.
Why not teach one-pocket as the first game? Sure it's not the easiest to play well, but the rules are not that tough really. And if you start out teaching something where you have more strategy and different shots to pick from, would it not be better overall in the future? Has anyone tried to get a new player playing one-pocket?
I don't think this is hard to teach someone at all, but the different racking scenarios when the CB and/or OB are pocketed or in the rack take some getting used to.Trying to explain to a newbie why the 15th ball stays on the table and the cueball stays where it is will make them get a headache.
Unfortunately, at least in my opinion, I have to agree with this. The open break has become an icon of pool, at least in part to the opening scene of COM, so a lot of new players get really excited about having a fast break. I started off that way too, but now my feelings about an open break waver between indifference when things are going my way to hatred when they aren't. Maybe if you catch them early you can convince them there is a better way... :smile:They want to break a new rack every game, they don't want to play position to break it.
I was in a tournament a few days ago and some new faces showed up to play. I was showing them a few things on stance, bridge, stoke, and had a thought.
Why not teach one-pocket as the first game? Sure it's not the easiest to play well, but the rules are not that tough really. And if you start out teaching something where you have more strategy and different shots to pick from, would it not be better overall in the future? Has anyone tried to get a new player playing one-pocket?
hang-the-9;4865815 Why not teach one-pocket as the first game? Sure it's not the easiest to play well said:If the goal is to turn them off pool all together, then yes play them some one pocket.
But for beginners, just throw all balls on the table and let them make balls. If they wanted to play you then perhaps you might try to run them in order or bank them in.
From OnePocket.org
"It is a game that players often graduate to after building a foundation of pool skills at 8-Ball, 9-Ball or Straight Pool -- and sometimes even 3 Cushion Billiards. It has a more daunting learning curve than other pool games, which makes it not so well suited for beginning players."
Not true at all sir. You learn a lot playing one pocket. Its just not for everyone, just like Religion.
One-pocket isn't like a cult, or a religion, or a political party.
It's more like the Waiting Room at the doctor's office: you sit and wait for hours. By the time they call your name, you've forgotten why you're there.
One-pocket isn't like a cult, or a religion, or a political party.
It's more like the Waiting Room at the doctor's office: you sit and wait for hours. By the time they call your name, you've forgotten why you're there.
I was in a tournament a few days ago and some new faces showed up to play. I was showing them a few things on stance, bridge, stoke, and had a thought.
Why not teach one-pocket as the first game? Sure it's not the easiest to play well, but the rules are not that tough really. And if you start out teaching something where you have more strategy and different shots to pick from, would it not be better overall in the future? Has anyone tried to get a new player playing one-pocket?