...For me though, all the talk about 9 ball or whatever game being broken is really just putting the cart before the house. The real problem isn't necessarily the specific rules the pros are playing by but the way the game is showcased. I don't think the Mosconi Cup has become successful because of the specific nine ball rules they are using. For that matter, I think they could be playing... 10 ball or possibly even 8 ball and because it is produced so well -- people would watch it.
Tournament 9 – Ball has been on a slow decline since Corey Deuel’s 11 – 0 win at the 2001 US Open. Most of the premier rotation events these days are now 10 – Ball. Challenge matches (TAR, etc) and even “green room” gambling matchups are now primarily 10 – Ball.
The reason for this is that the game of 9 – Ball has become too easy for top shelf shortstops and pros. The monster and/or soft break, consistent making of a ball on the break (one in the side and corner ball in the bottom corner pocket), pattern racking, racking secrets and near perfect play are all contributing factors.
What can save the game of 9 – Ball????
I propose the following (could be used for 10 – Ball as well):
• Alternate break EXCEPT if breaker parks the CB in “the landing zone” (see diagram below………egg shaped circle), makes a ball on the break and then runs out, he/she maintains the table and gets to break again the next game. If breaker makes a ball on the break but does not land the CB in the “landing zone” or breaks dry the very next shot is 2-shot push out rules UNTIL the first ball is made………….like Buddy Hall once said, make them "wrestle" for the first ball. After the first ball is made then its Texas Express rules until the game is over. Note: The breaker must "park" the CB in the landing zone, hitting a rail first would not count.
• Break from the Break Box.
• Do studies on where it is most difficult to make a ball from and rack the nineball on this spot…….somewhere between the spot and the traditional racking area. Use the Magic Rack or Sardo Tight Rack.......no manual racking. Three balls must pass the head string.
These rules would force the breaker to break hard with maximum attention on controlling the CB, making a ball, and running out to maintain the table……..only way to string racks together.
The 2-shot push out rule on the first ball (except for above “landing zone” rule) would, at least a bit, force a strategic battle for the first shot, something that 9 - Ball has been missing and dearly needs IMHO. It would prolong the match a bit perhaps but it would favor the better player and longer races would not be needed as much…….say race to 9 vs. 11.
The tournament or tour sponsor could have the cloth provider put their logo in the landing zone area. I think Camel did this when they were the sponsor of the PBT……..or ESPN, TOC????
View attachment 296735
Am I crazy? Please discuss. Thx.
Duke (“Ty”) Laha
I wonder what the top pros would think of these rules?
It was a great tournament! Matchroom's got it right. Racking the nine on the spot works. You must run out and every rack is vitally important. One mistake can be costly. 9-Ball works in this format.
Special congratulations to Team Philippines and also to Team Holland, who had to beat some damn good teams to get to the finals. Team Philippines had an amazing match with Team Taiwan in the semis, two heavyweights punching it out. It was great TV! It would even play in the USA if any channel would show it. Pool does work on TV, contrary to what some people think. It's a great TV sport.
Tournament 9 – Ball has been on a slow decline since Corey Deuel’s 11 – 0 win at the 2001 US Open. Most of the premier rotation events these days are now 10 – Ball. Challenge matches (TAR, etc) and even “green room” gambling matchups are now primarily 10 – Ball.
The reason for this is that the game of 9 – Ball has become too easy for top shelf shortstops and pros. The monster and/or soft break, consistent making of a ball on the break (one in the side and corner ball in the bottom corner pocket), pattern racking, racking secrets and near perfect play are all contributing factors.
What can save the game of 9 – Ball????
I propose the following (could be used for 10 – Ball as well):
• Alternate break EXCEPT if breaker parks the CB in “the landing zone” (see diagram below………egg shaped circle), makes a ball on the break and then runs out, he/she maintains the table and gets to break again the next game. If breaker makes a ball on the break but does not land the CB in the “landing zone” or breaks dry the very next shot is 2-shot push out rules UNTIL the first ball is made………….like Buddy Hall once said, make them "wrestle" for the first ball. After the first ball is made then its Texas Express rules until the game is over. Note: The breaker must "park" the CB in the landing zone, hitting a rail first would not count.
• Break from the Break Box.
• Do studies on where it is most difficult to make a ball from and rack the nineball on this spot…….somewhere between the spot and the traditional racking area. Use the Magic Rack or Sardo Tight Rack.......no manual racking. Three balls must pass the head string.
These rules would force the breaker to break hard with maximum attention on controlling the CB, making a ball, and running out to maintain the table……..only way to string racks together.
The 2-shot push out rule on the first ball (except for above “landing zone” rule) would, at least a bit, force a strategic battle for the first shot, something that 9 - Ball has been missing and dearly needs IMHO. It would prolong the match a bit perhaps but it would favor the better player and longer races would not be needed as much…….say race to 9 vs. 11.
The tournament or tour sponsor could have the cloth provider put their logo in the landing zone area. I think Camel did this when they were the sponsor of the PBT……..or ESPN, TOC????
View attachment 296735
Am I crazy? Please discuss. Thx.
Duke (“Ty”) Laha