As a former BCA instructor, care to elaborate on that a little?? (The part I highlighted in red.) I think it is pretty safe to say that I have been known to post what many today think are far out shots that should never be played.
I really don't know where you are coming from with that statement????
You want to talk gaff racks, just look at the road players of the 70's and 80's. With a lot of them, good luck EVER making a ball on their racks! There still are some of them around. :wink:
You ever asked anyone for weight playing a race to three for $1000? or given it for that matter?
Chris
I only said that that was 'part' of it back then.
Yes , speed has been around forever , but you don't see actual 'speed freaks' today like you did back then .
recreational coke use today is NOTHING like it's heyday in the 80's.
And a tweeker methhead is a different critter - believe me , I've seen both.
Guy doing the occasional toot , and a guy with a crystal habit are worlds apart.
remember , the 80's gave us celebrities setting themselves on fire trying to freebase on a regular basis ( Richard , Micheal , etc ) . . . . .
Greyghost, I agree with a lot of what you said, but the part I quoted above is just plain wrong! Making the wing ball is the result of a TIGHT rack, NOT a gaffed rack. And, then the skill to find out the right speed and DUPLICATE it each and EVERY break.
You want to talk gaff racks, just look at the road players of the 70's and 80's. With a lot of them, good luck EVER making a ball on their racks! There still are some of them around. :wink:
Great post Grey i agree 100%. It is like a child mentality. I hate handicapping, I know i dont have a chance but you supposed to let me win. That one reason i wont take a spot. I dont care if someone beats my brains out. I wont take a spot. If they offer me a spot after beating my ass, I still wont take a spot. If i have to have a spot i wont play until i feel like i have a chance. With me its always been about how i play not about the money. If i had to do it for the money then it may be different.
"Ah yes, I hear that, the sweet ring of truth!"Maybe they learned that smart play wins over showy play.
:wink:
Steve
"Ah yes, I hear that, the sweet ring of truth!"
...there have always been people that play "WIDE OPEN." See how many players from that era, that tried to give and out-run ridiculous spots had any money left at the end of the day? Answer, NONE! (A super money player from that era who favored wide open play, like Bucky Bell could state this better), but You will go broke playing that way, you did in the eighties and you most certainly will playing against the top young guns of today!
In days and times past, most regional shortstops folded up, playing against an "Internationally known "gun," like a DiLiberto, or Sigel, and I'm sure they'd attest to that." Today however, "EVERYONE fires at you despite your reputation! Just ask Mike Sigel how intimidated 18 year old Jesse Engel was of him this year at the Open?
And if any of you seriously think the play was better in the 80's, your deluding yourself believing that fairy-tale! The players of today, play percentages, because that's what "WINS, did in the 80's, does today." It's just that more players realize that today and play that way because of that fact! You may win some matches "free-stroking" and playing wide open, but you won't get to the end of a pro tournament trying that SH*T!!!:banghead:
If your asking if I'm a pussy that I am not sir.
Got any more questions to ask me brother? Your more than welcome to try and call me out again.....sorry it didn't work out for you....
-Grey Ghost-
I can see you're a cerebral man who doesn't let his emotions get in the way of thinking things through. I am not interested in the chest thumping and posturing, I am simply trying to point out that while you are quick to blame the state of the game on the "pussification of america" you willingly put yourself in a position in which you perpetuate said problem.
As I understand it, the point of giving and taking weight is to create an equal playing field in which both players think they have the opportunity to win/succeed. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this what you meant to imply was the very problem with, as you so eloquently put it, the "pussification of america"?
Chris
As I understand it, the point of giving and taking weight is to create an equal playing field in which both players think they have the opportunity to win/succeed. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this what you meant to imply was the very problem with, as you so eloquently put it, the "pussification of america"?
Chris
Hey Jesse, Your skills are amazing. You rock brother. Keep on posting the vids :thumbup:the power of perception. I always thought weight was just a way to give an average player the idea he had a chance, when in reality he was still going to lose 89.587% of the time. May the myth of the "equal playing field" continue!