I had also email you about month and a half ago about new small machine 12 wide for pool cues,Never got reply back also
![]()
Can that be requested with more Z clearance, George?
Thanks.
I had also email you about month and a half ago about new small machine 12 wide for pool cues,Never got reply back also
![]()
Hi George, welcome to the forum.
I'm wondering how torque or lack there of, and quality of motor has any relation to resolution and how resolution can be lost if its already had?
Sorry wasn't really paying attention when i replied.
i was thinking stalling
On steppers, there is a big difference in torque from brand name motors to ebay motors.
To compensate for resolution on fast ballscrew, you use higher driver stepping, 1/32 or 1/64 step.
Low quality controller will not keep up on 1/32 or 1/64 step at fast speed and stall and miss steps.
Never had problem with low torque even at 1200ipm, .
This vid is running at 1/32 step, if 1/16th step it would be alot faster . it is also a big machine with heavy gantry,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0V_10TdGrk
What happened to the rest of the pages?
On rolled ballscrews , by saying they are all the same , is like saying pool cue with sticker as inlay is same as machining in the inlay.
China rolled screw do not compare to Taiwan or Japan rolled.
China ground screws don't even compare Taiwan rolled screw.
Ballscrew on Raptors or any of them with upgrade is .00001 , stock ones are .0001
In China, .0006 is just on paper , not tested to each ballscrew.
Upgraded ballscrews on machines are rolled and ground Finnish
You wont find a china ballscrew work like on in video below
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vEtAwySvgc
George, this may seem harsh but its real. Theres ALOT of things that I feel you have done very well with the machine design compared to your competitors such as large plate, minimal extrusion, oversized rails and ballscrews and anodizing.....however there is one thing that really baffles me.
I've had a few people ask me what I thought of the Xzero machines and my response has been the same.
I love the machine, the guy has done alot of things right but theres one thing that totally turns me off. This guy goes to the trouble to source TBI "or similar quality" screws, angular contact bearings and then secures the screw with a motor coupling? Huh? Really? A guy who designs and executes a machine in which competes with guys at 3x the price range and he secures the screw with a motor coupling? Why not spend the extra couple of bucks to have the screw supplier thread the ends and provide the nut like the rest of the world? I mean, even if you increase the cost of the machine $300 to make it bullet proof then your still way lower than the competion.
George...your market position with these machines only stands to get stronger.....don't let some small but vital detail ruin that.
I can't speak for George, but on the set up I am buying, I helped in it's initial design and manufacturing. On the ball screws, there is only a thrust retention on 1 end of the ball screw. Thrust and secured from 1 end only, the other end is supported but can float in the axial moment. This was intentional on our soon to be My machine. The reason was the screw is steel, the frame is Aluminum. They expand at different rates, so allowed for the difference in lengths to take place in the end shaft support. This is done on all the axis screws. The total movement between a hot day and a cool night is not really huge, but it is still there.
The motor to the shaft is coupled through one of those special flexi couplings just like what Hardinge use on their super precision lathes, but only smaller ones. The other option was to use wavey spring packs on the end of the leadscrews to keep tension on the screw the whole time. But there has not been any problem with what we have made so far. The only upgrade is going to be more powerful stepper on the 3 axis to handle the ruffing out of steel parts.
Neil
Neil,
We want pics when your are set up and running.
Good luck with the new set up.:thumbup:
Rick
I can't speak for George, but on the set up I am buying, I helped in it's initial design and manufacturing. On the ball screws, there is only a thrust retention on 1 end of the ball screw. Thrust and secured from 1 end only, the other end is supported but can float in the axial moment. This was intentional on our soon to be My machine. The reason was the screw is steel, the frame is Aluminum. They expand at different rates, so allowed for the difference in lengths to take place in the end shaft support. This is done on all the axis screws. The total movement between a hot day and a cool night is not really huge, but it is still there.
The motor to the shaft is coupled through one of those special flexi couplings just like what Hardinge use on their super precision lathes, but only smaller ones. The other option was to use wavey spring packs on the end of the leadscrews to keep tension on the screw the whole time. But there has not been any problem with what we have made so far. The only upgrade is going to be more powerful stepper on the 3 axis to handle the ruffing out of steel parts.
Neil
George, this may seem harsh but its real. Theres ALOT of things that I feel you have done very well with the machine design compared to your competitors such as large plate, minimal extrusion, oversized rails and ballscrews and anodizing.....however there is one thing that really baffles me.
I've had a few people ask me what I thought of the Xzero machines and my response has been the same.
I love the machine, the guy has done alot of things right but theres one thing that totally turns me off. This guy goes to the trouble to source TBI "or similar quality" screws, angular contact bearings and then secures the screw with a motor coupling? Huh? Really? A guy who designs and executes a machine in which competes with guys at 3x the price range and he secures the screw with a motor coupling? Why not spend the extra couple of bucks to have the screw supplier thread the ends and provide the nut like the rest of the world? I mean, even if you increase the cost of the machine $300 to make it bullet proof then your still way lower than the competion.
George...your market position with these machines only stands to get stronger.....don't let some small but vital detail ruin that.
My frame and whatnots arrived. Ballscrews are leaving Hong Kong.
I ran out of money for the rest... :-( need motors BOB, VFD, and spindle.....
I'll document everything in detail like I did the DRO.
That's when I find a place to put this thing.....
George, this may seem harsh but its real. Theres ALOT of things that I feel you have done very well with the machine design compared to your competitors such as large plate, minimal extrusion, oversized rails and ballscrews and anodizing.....however there is one thing that really baffles me.
I've had a few people ask me what I thought of the Xzero machines and my response has been the same.
I love the machine, the guy has done alot of things right but theres one thing that totally turns me off. This guy goes to the trouble to source TBI "or similar quality" screws, angular contact bearings and then secures the screw with a motor coupling? Huh? Really? A guy who designs and executes a machine in which competes with guys at 3x the price range and he secures the screw with a motor coupling? Why not spend the extra couple of bucks to have the screw supplier thread the ends and provide the nut like the rest of the world? I mean, even if you increase the cost of the machine $300 to make it bullet proof then your still way lower than the competion.
George...your market position with these machines only stands to get stronger.....don't let some small but vital detail ruin that.
George, this may seem harsh but its real. Theres ALOT of things that I feel you have done very well with the machine design compared to your competitors such as large plate, minimal extrusion, oversized rails and ballscrews and anodizing.....however there is one thing that really baffles me.
I've had a few people ask me what I thought of the Xzero machines and my response has been the same.
I love the machine, the guy has done alot of things right but theres one thing that totally turns me off. This guy goes to the trouble to source TBI "or similar quality" screws, angular contact bearings and then secures the screw with a motor coupling? Huh? Really? A guy who designs and executes a machine in which competes with guys at 3x the price range and he secures the screw with a motor coupling? Why not spend the extra couple of bucks to have the screw supplier thread the ends and provide the nut like the rest of the world? I mean, even if you increase the cost of the machine $300 to make it bullet proof then your still way lower than the competion.
George...your market position with these machines only stands to get stronger.....don't let some small but vital detail ruin that.
Randy,
I find that odd as well. Is it common for ballscrews that are sourced from Taiwan or Japan to be routed through Hong Kong?
Don't get me wrong, I don't want to be that guy who only tries to blow holes in his scenario, but I am that guy who believes that if it seems to good to be true then it usually is.
With all that being said, if George would consider threading the ballscrews and confirm the origin of ballscrews to be a quality source, I'll buy a frame