With all due respect. You may be a very fine instructor with papers to prove it, as well as a world beater skill wise, I don't know; and what you say may or may not be true. But as soon as you say;
It is a sure sign (for me) that whatever follows is probably BS, sorry if that's harsh but it has become a "learned response" in my case; and I am sure I am not alone.
To the OP:
What do you guys think about the importance of getting down perfectly straight on the shot, meaning having your back foot, arm, and cue on the aiming line before you get down on the ball.
I think if you don't most people are going to be in big trouble
When I take practice strokes in the air, my cue and arm is slightly to the left of the aim line, then as I get down on the ball, my cue comes into the aim line. Is this important? Does it really matter?
I noticed you said "slightly" I would say that as long as you are stepping into the shot and not making "big" adjustments on the way down it's fine; and isn't something I would correct, lots of people step in sometimes, step back sometimes, step in from the left sometimes and step in from the right other times; that is what hinders the biggest % of the population.
Also what is your opinion about what Hohamann says in the first minute of this video.
If I didn't agree with something and Hohamann then said it; I would change my point of view, enough said.
He is basically saying that you should turn your stance so your arm swings forward/straight naturally?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPn3Wzp4NT8
I think what Hohamann is trying to say is that whether you step into the shot or not you shouldn't be square to the table and then adjust your body on the way down.
You should be standing at the angle that you are about to step into from the outset, and that a way to find this is to grab the balance, stand square (like your not supposed to). You will see the cue go to the line it should be starting in, move your body so the stick and the balls are in the shot line and that's the angle you should start out at. And that this is a way to "find" the angle that you need to be standing at at 1st.
I think that's what he's saying not 100% sure, I will go try that; it would be consistent with what I do (hopefully; will have to check) and what I teach, just not how I show it to people. It sure makes sense to me.
Also who do you think gets down on the ball the best?
Not sure what you mean, if you mean generally among pros I don't think there is such a thing, if you mean between those 2; I would say Hohamann and he should, he is younger, more flexible, in better shape and is more agile than Massy, there is no reason he shouldn't.