In those cases I like to say "nah, you're right, you're the better player" with a totally straight face. If the sarcasm doesn't register, I know this person is too dumb to teach.
Explaining stuff like kicks is nice because the physics make sense and you can demonstrate them on the spot... but where I get frustrated is trying to explain risk/reward and odds to people.
Because it's subjective, and every situation is different... you never can just "prove" you're right in a few minutes, they might need to play another year before they get it. Or they might never get it.
Just last week I told my teammate (APA 6, ~75% win rate) that he shouldn't be wasting his time trying length of the table banks, that he had better options in a game of 10ball, and he was selling out every time he tries them.
He argued the full table bank was "easy". I told him I'd pay him for every bank he made over 50%, and said "actually I'd be pretty impressed if you made 30% of them". We set up the same bank and he managed 3 out of 10. But he didn't seem convinced. I know the next time we play, he's gonna take that flyer again.
Explaining stuff like kicks is nice because the physics make sense and you can demonstrate them on the spot... but where I get frustrated is trying to explain risk/reward and odds to people.
Because it's subjective, and every situation is different... you never can just "prove" you're right in a few minutes, they might need to play another year before they get it. Or they might never get it.
Just last week I told my teammate (APA 6, ~75% win rate) that he shouldn't be wasting his time trying length of the table banks, that he had better options in a game of 10ball, and he was selling out every time he tries them.
He argued the full table bank was "easy". I told him I'd pay him for every bank he made over 50%, and said "actually I'd be pretty impressed if you made 30% of them". We set up the same bank and he managed 3 out of 10. But he didn't seem convinced. I know the next time we play, he's gonna take that flyer again.