Bamacues said:
Being sold by the original owner, so I assume that is "Al Morales".
While this is a beautiful cue and certainly a great example of Szamboti's work, I have a question (for all you serious collectors). What impact does an owner's name add or detract from cue value such as this, assuming that the provenance offered is not from a legendary player, etc?
On highly collectible cues, a name is usually a desirable feature if it is original to the cue. It helps authenticate the cue. Did you know that Barry Szamboti does not "authenticate" Gus Szamboti cues? He will give an opinion and work on them, but there is no official declaration that guarantees it's a Gus Szamboti. So, this name helps the cue's lineage and having the packaging helps a lot too.
I run into this a lot with Palmers, Paradise and Rambow. Burton Spain did this too. Some people take the name labels off and it hurts the value more than they know.
On Palmer's I prefer having a name on the cue instead of "Original by Palmer" because it adds to the history. It also means that the cue was special ordered. Here's a case where I tracked down the original owner after 30 years and got a great story from him:
http://www.palmercollector.com/Model20KerryPage.html
On Rambow, if the cue is not personalized or signed, it hurts the value a lot.
So, in the case of a Szamboti, having the name probably doesn't help the value, but certainly doesn't hurt the value and helps authenticate the cue.
What hurts the value is the lack of overseas buyers at the moment paying super premiums for Gus Szamboti cues.
My guess (and it's just a guess) is that there are standing offers on this cue that are below the seller's expectations, and the seller is trying to get the highest price, even if it takes some time to get it.
Chris