To original poster:
If would seem that you have a legal argument on your hands. Certainly nothing for the public to be concerned with.
I do not see what he is doing as "harassment." Mr. S is simply trying to protect his business interest, and if he is wrong for doing so, the only resolution I could see in one to be determined by the courts. But, I do not in anyway blame him for his actions.
Personally, I can see both sides of it. I for one do see that "PoolRoomTees" is suspiciously similar.
Legally, I do not know, but if "Tiger Billiards" or anything like it one day came to be, from someone other than us, we'd be all over it like white on rice.
If would seem that you have a legal argument on your hands. Certainly nothing for the public to be concerned with.
I do not see what he is doing as "harassment." Mr. S is simply trying to protect his business interest, and if he is wrong for doing so, the only resolution I could see in one to be determined by the courts. But, I do not in anyway blame him for his actions.
Personally, I can see both sides of it. I for one do see that "PoolRoomTees" is suspiciously similar.
Legally, I do not know, but if "Tiger Billiards" or anything like it one day came to be, from someone other than us, we'd be all over it like white on rice.