just a bump, because I hate to see this thread move past the first page.
I'm glad the cue is being enjoyed.
Joe's pics came out good. Cues are hard to photograph, as is silver.
Thanks
Kevin
Last edited:
just a bump, because I hate to see this thread move past the first page.
Amusing, because if some unknown cue maker put up these pictures for a sample of his work, I believe he would get slammed on this forum. Yet, because it's a Ginacue, people drool over the same cue.
The wood points are not even, from what I have read on here, that is a minus. The scroll work on the silver, especially the areas that the lines go into a 'circle', look like his hand was pretty shaky at the time. Seems like that would also be a big minus to people evaluating it.
I'm not a cue collector, so I looked at this cue in a different light than most on here probably did. It looks like a nice cue, but not my preference of style. I did notice a few things though, that seem to be totally overlooked. A few things that I found a little amusing.
Amusing, because if some unknown cue maker put up these pictures for a sample of his work, I believe he would get slammed on this forum. Yet, because it's a Ginacue, people drool over the same cue.
The wood points are not even, from what I have read on here, that is a minus. The scroll work on the silver, especially the areas that the lines go into a 'circle', look like his hand was pretty shaky at the time. Seems like that would also be a big minus to people evaluating it.
Not slamming this cue at all, like I said, I just find it amusing that different standards seem to be in play depending on the name on the cue.
Probably the same reasons (not clear to me either) why I see Sneaky Petes built by famous builders command three times the price of anyone elses. I agree with you that while I appreciate the remarkable craftsmanship I don't find it beautiful at all, sorry :embarrassed2:
Who offered $350,000?
Granted, everyone's taste is different.
But I will tell you that for many of us growing up on the West Coast in the 60's, the cues Ernie (and Tad) were making were what you coveted. They were the coolest looking cues. They were the ones you hoped one day you would own. Back then ALL the top players were playing with their cues. I can't speak for the LA crowd, but around San Francisco you could go into a room and see half a dozen Ginas in play, usually in the hands of the very best players. So many of us are hard-wired to love the look of his cues.
The Silver Gina is a riff on one of Ernie's classic designs, now copied by just about everybody. I get why some would not find it a beautiful cue. But there is a whole group of us that do find it an incredible piece of craftsmanship and a true work of art.
Lou Figueroa
Speaking of Tad's.... on behalf of a cue collecting friend, I drove down to Tad's office one day and presented an offer - my friend wanted to order an ivory Tad for up to $50,000 cash.
I met with Fred who could not say "no" fast enough. I would have been back thrown out like a vacuum cleaner salesman if I did not quickly change the subject and present them with a gift of a framed photograph of a rare Tad collection.
He then politely explained to me the ivory Tad's cannot be ordered, no matter the cost, at all. Not for sale, no matter what, no matter how much.
That tends to drive prices up.
Chris
Chris, is that because they don't want to work with ivory or some other reason?
Scott
Actually, the story is in the Blue Book and has been told for many years. It basically says that in 1966, this cue was offered for sale for $3500 and it remained unsold. Later, a collector who refused the cue at $3500 offered $300,000 for it. It wasn't disclosed who the collector was.
Keep this in mind. When Ernie was selling cues in the early 1960's they were $65. By the end of the 1960's, he was a star and his clientele consisted of celebrities, movie stars and athletes. His cues were selling for several thousand dollars - unheard of at the time. It was probably some rich guy trying to tempt Ernie to sell the cue. It's not for sale, so it doesn't really matter.
Had he not started making cues again after his haitus in 1973 - 1988, my guess is all those early cues would all be priced somewhere in the Balabushka realm.
Just a side note that Ernie was quite gracious to allow the cue to be photographed and shown.
Chris
Chris, is that because they don't want to work with ivory or some other reason?
Scott
Here it is:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hey Chris,Tad makes them himself and was able to make about one a year - they are fancy, difficult, and time consuming - my understandin is they were promised to Lucky in Japan. Everybody expects perfect work and working with ivory is not forgiving.
Hey Chris,
I've owned several Ivory Tads. They are truely beautiful... I'll try to dig some pictures out for you..
There are reasons the Ivory Tads are not available to the public, that is a private matter.. They aren't all promised to Lucky.
Best,
Ken
Here are some pics of what is arguably the most collectible cue ever made. The way I understand it, the trinity of holy grail cues is the Golden Babushka, the Last Gus and the Silver Gina. Ernie Gutierrez's 69th birthday was yesterday and he celebrated by working all day like he does every day except Sunday. Kam Daswani (Kam here at AZ) was there visiting Ernie's, as was my friend Joe Richland (junksecret here in AZ land).
it was definitely a good day
and it was nice to finally meet....
kam
I was at Johnston City in 1968 (I believe) when Ernie came there to take orders for his cues. He brought the Silver Ginacue and offered it then for $4,000. I ordered a player that was $115 the best I can recall. One collector I talked to a few years back told me he had offered $100,000 for the Silver Ginacue.
Frank B