Here it is!
- Thread starter Meatball
- Start date
MyraCurfs said:
Well, I'm no prude and certainly not Angelic by any means of the imagination. What two Adults do behind closed doors doesnt bother or offend me at all.
Although, what is acceptable to one, may not be to the other. If one has to think about it and ask himself the question, "can I get away with this, or she won't mind", then it is probably wrong. So, to answer your question, if I kiss someone and grab her Boobies, I am dead wrong and she is the victim. The severity of the act would be up to the victim at that point.
I would hope that I'm never in that situation #1. #2 If I am in a High Profile Position and a married man, I would hope that I am smart enough not to even consider such behavior. If I do though, I have issues which need to be dealt with.
TheOne said:Why don't you take your opinion and stick it up you a** you mother f***** stup** son of a rabid wh***, I'll f*** you up if you start that sh** around here, ya f***** c***!
I don't know about anyone else...but I find that pink smiley face in your post rather offensive...HA!
sixpack said:
It's there - the forum server's time got changed last night, to a few hours back from where it was - so newer posts appeared 'older' and moved up in the thread list. Eydie's initial posts are there, they're just farther down the food chain now. :/
ironman said:
well i wouldn't want to feed all the guys that have issues then or in that matter not even all the women. But you do have a point by what's acceptabele to one is not acceptable to another. For me it would not be acceptable.... but i just would have turned around his nuts 360 degrees and gave him a blue eye... so he could have gone home to his wife and explain how he got it.
Jay...<<When corporate officers conceal illegal activities, they can be held liable. i.e. Worldcom and Enron (Lay, Skilling and Fastow). And the liabilities are not limited to civil penalties either. Jail time is certainly an option here.>>
Right Jay. That is why I stated...
"in most...but not all...cases, you cannot sue corporate officers PERSONALLY, unless you can show that their conduct was committed outside their roles as corporate officers."
Criminal conduct is, of course, outside the roles of corporate executives.
Regards,
Jim
Right Jay. That is why I stated...
"in most...but not all...cases, you cannot sue corporate officers PERSONALLY, unless you can show that their conduct was committed outside their roles as corporate officers."
Criminal conduct is, of course, outside the roles of corporate executives.
Regards,
Jim
MyraCurfs said:
Order in the court, ORDER IN THE COURT !
Meatball...A genuine welcome to the forum. Might I ask, with all due respect, and without necessarily including any rumored IPT conduct...how do you feel, in general, out people who lie repeatedly in order to cover up...or "stall for time" in issues as important as other people's hard earned income?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Regards,
Jim
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Regards,
Jim
TheOne said:wooooo there, that's too far, I'm not into that!
Yeah.. But SOME people are!
CNN International.com said:
Gives a whole new meaning to the insult "Eat me!"
But officer, he told me to eat him. What was I supposed to do?
Russ
Wow, I'm almost at a loss for words reguarding the incident with Deno, I never liked the man alot to begin with but this just makes me sick. If he is proven guilty which is likely to happen I hope he gets what he deserves, before Deno had anything to do with the IPT he was one of the most respected people in the world of billiards. Now he will be considered a low life POS, but I guess being one of KT's head honcho's will do that to you.
P.S.
What would this forum be without Eydie?
P.S.
What would this forum be without Eydie?