Monte,
Thanks for the PM.
To me this cue looks like it was an old conversion from a one piece 26 1/2 from the 1920's or 1930's.
I've scanned some old Brunswick catalogs - compare your cue to the 1928 and 1939 catalog cues in these scans:
http://www.palmercollector.com/Brunswick/BruswickCollectorHomePage.html
Your cue was done along the lines of a 1930's style factory cue, but the joint screw is not standard to any Brunswick I've seen. A conversion would explain the weight difference.
To help me date the cue, is the weight stamped in the butt or burned into the forearm?
You mentioned the joint might be buckhorn? Can you tell if the ferrule is fiber, ivory, or buckhorn?
Depending on your answers, I can give you some restoration or modern conversion ideas.
Chris
Chris,
I have what I believe to be a Brunswick(no label nor any identifying marks)
2 pc butterfly with 2 veeners, that looks to have that exact same screw.
Dale
Chris... You constantly amaze me...... :thumbup:
That is exactly what I want for my cue. I have an old KU bumber I'd like to put on. Do you have Roger Petit contact info?Oh, ok - if it has a signature and forearm weight stamp, it's a converted Titlist. In all likelyhood it is a very early Titlist looking at the veneers.
The signature can help date the cue. Somebody copied the style of the older 2 piece cues used in the 30's with the joint style and screw in the shaft. In those days, however, the shaft was always shorter than the butt by a couple of inches. It wasn't until the late 30's they started making them the same length.
There's lots of things you can do with it. Probably minimally is have the joint changed to a modern screw like a 3/8 X 10 (they can leave the collar as is) - it's not a major operation, and have a new (straight) shaft made, then do a butt treatment like this cue - which is a classic older style Brunswick look.
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=243866
I like these minimal conversions like the Roger Petit cue above. He did a nice job and was reasonable for Sam.
Chris
It's very odd indeed, Dale.
Well, we can assume that since Monte's cue has Titlist markings and since Titlists were one piece cues, this wasn't a factory job. As far as Brunswick joints, the only factory examples screws I've run into are:
- The Willie Hoppe's which are brass 5/14 X 14 piloted, sharp head, scew in the handle side. Brass or rarely a phenolic joint collar.
- 1930's and earlier brass 5/16X18 flat faced or piloted, screw in the shaft, brass, fiber, phenolic, ivory or horn collars.
- 1930's and earlier, a 3/8 X 10 aluminum flat faced or piloted, screw in the shaft, fiber, phenolic, ivory or horn collars.
If you scroll down through the 1928 cues in this link below, it shows a pretty clear picture of each joint type. I pretty much have them all in different cues, so I can tell you the photo is pretty accurate.
http://www.palmercollector.com/Brunswick/BruswickCollectorColorPlates.html
Even though it seems like a stretch, it's possible your cue and this cue of Monte's were converted by the same guy. Does your cue have a weight stamp in the butt area? All old Brunswick's (except the very earliest) will have a weight stamp in the butt. Sometimes it's hard to see it but it's about 2 inches from the bottom.
Generally Brunswicks with butterflys were older cues. If you notice in the 1928 catalog, the butterfly cues with multi colored veneers are gone (except the 360). Those double butterflys with veneers would be a cue from prior to 1920 or so.
Your butterfly could be a Katz or soimething like that converted by the same guy.
I checked my Eddie Laube and Burton Spain joints - 2 cue makers who liked putting screws on the shaft side - and they both used different screws than the one on Monte's cue.Below is a picture of a Katz butterfly.
Chris