How Much Is This Cue Worth

$1000ish with the single shaft, but you might be able to get more in trade from a certain R.Black dealer.... :D
 
MikeJanis said:
Pre 1980, Richard did not sign his cues.

I know that's what it says in the Blue Book Of Pool Cues, but:
 

Attachments

  • R_Black_1979_2.jpg
    R_Black_1979_2.jpg
    55.9 KB · Views: 248
LOL. It just cracks me up how many guys on this forum watch southpark.
RESPECT MAH AUTHORITAH!!!!!!!!!!

layout.jpg


P.S. Sorry Mike for the hijack. Very Nice Richard Black.
Good luck with the sale. (If its for sale)
 
The After Six Is The Most Common Of Richards Older Cues. Some But Not All Of The Were Signed Before 1980. I've Had 3 That Were And 3 Or 4 That Weren't. I'd Say With One Shaft, If All Original About 900. If Refinished About 750-800. It's Also Going To Depend On If It's One That Plays Well, Or If It Hits Like A Broom Stick.
 
FAST_N_LOOSE said:
The After Six Is The Most Common Of Richards Older Cues. Some But Not All Of The Were Signed Before 1980. I've Had 3 That Were And 3 Or 4 That Weren't. I'd Say With One Shaft, If All Original About 900. If Refinished About 750-800. It's Also Going To Depend On If It's One That Plays Well, Or If It Hits Like A Broom Stick.


YOU NEVER KNOW:o
 
the older sigs could have been done on refinish



thats ok put it on ebay mike. youll get 1200.

i had a 400$ scruggs that sold on ebay for $1600. then on here twice for over 1000$

dont trust what some of these "dealers" tell you
 
Last edited:
SphinxnihpS said:
LOL.But on another note i have seen a RB with signature also 1979,nice cue and was bought by a buddy of mine for $700 recently with one shaft,i think thats a good price,if you get a $1000 you did good but the market is crappy so you never know.It amazes me that his cues arent worth more then they are when i see a guy who is relatively new selling a cue for close to what this ones market value is.I mean would i want this Black or the new kid on the block?:cool:
 
I sold an 81 black baron with two shafts for 1500...and realisticly if this cue brings over 1k I would be VERY surprised. I would not give 200 for it personally without hitting it first.
 
dave sutton said:
the older sigs could have been done on refinish

That would be highly unethical. I can't imagine any reputable cuemaker doing something like that, certainly not a friend who's been in the business for over 35 years.
 
Last edited:
BTW, the 1979 4 Point cue I posted cost me $1050 on ebay last month. It came with 3 shafts, 1 is an original, the other 2 are newer.:)
 
WalkerInTN said:
That would be highly unethical. I can't imagine any reputable cuemaker doing something like that, certainly not a friend who's been in the business for over 35 years.

not unethical. if RB refinished in in 2005 and wanted to sign it or the customer wanted him sign it with the date it was made

i dont see a prob


i had the tim scruggs the bamacues just sold with no "ts" on it. tim wanted to take it back and put his logo on it. i said no
 
dave sutton said:
not unethical. if RB refinished in in 2005 and wanted to sign it or the customer wanted him sign it with the date it was made

i dont see a prob


i had the tim scruggs the bamacues just sold with no "ts" on it. tim wanted to take it back and put his logo on it. i said no

What I'm referring to is adding a date. I could understand wanting to "sign" their work. Adding the date is a bit different though.

For example, the cue up for auction. Seller says it's a late '78, but who really knows for sure? Richard Black just says it's from the late 70's. It might really be a 1977, it might be a 1978, or it might be a 1979. Without some type of documentation, it's all just speculation.

So to assign a date 30+ years later (by signing & dating it during a refinish), without actually knowing what year it was made would be unethical. That's what I meant.:)

Now if it could be shown through documentation that without a doubt, the cue was made in 1978, I wouldn't see any issues dating it as such.

Personally, I'd rather see it stay original, like the unsigned Scruggs you mentioned.:cool:
 
I'm glad everyone got a kick out of that. I didn't really mean to suggest that the signature is PSed. I was just trying to be funneh. I agree with the $750- $950 folks.
 
Back
Top