GoTulane said:AZB'er DMGWALSH has these hoppe cues, and is looking to see how old they are. Please direct any questions to him, or post on this thread. Check them out, and let him know what you think.
Thanks,
Michael
nick serdula said:If the ebony cue was a titlist 1 piece cue yes. But it is a hoppe and will have limitations for a builder and the Hoppe cue have a far lower value in exotic woods in comparison to the titlist cues! You have valued the cues as titlist blanks ready for conversion. These cues are not in that catigory. Although a collector may see higher value. The cues are practically useless for conversion.
Just my $.02.
Nick![]()
TATE said:The label on the one with the ivory ring is early 1940's. If it really is ebony and not just dark rosewood (the old stuff gets pretty dark with age), it's rare and worth a lot, maybe $1000 or even a few hundred more. If it's rosewood then about $600.
The other one is from the late 1960's to early 1970's I would say and worth $350 to $450. I am assuming on the values that these cues are in at least average condition.
Chris
dmgwalsh said:Thanks for the info. I gave the cues to Ed Young, a Chicago cue maker about two weeks ago to look into restoring, not converting. I will call him and ask him his opinion on the wood.
Do you think the cues should be restored? Would they be more valuable restored?
I will probably be interested in selling them as I have too many other cues anyway and nowhere to keep them.
TATE said:The prices I gave are what they've been going for on e-bay auctions for the last several years. Ebony Willie Hoppes are rare. If the Willie Hoppe is an ebony one for sure, I would pay $900 for it right now. I have several with the ivory rings which were made into the late 1950's - they command a premium.
If they were being valued on the basis of conversions, they would be worth less than as collectors cues. These cues can be conveted just like the one piece but it's a shame to see them ruined historically.
Chris
ABall said:You can refer to a fellow AZ'ers page for info on these cues. This is a great site!!!! Old Splice
This should give you the info you want and much more.
runscott said:Hi Chris - are you getting my emails? I sent a couple last week.
Thanks,
Scott
runscott said:Just noticed - the ebony one has the first label, but the second forearm signature. We don't know when Brunswick went to the second signature, but there are so many of the "first signature" blanks around, that I believe that combination is late 1940's. The 1949 catalog shows the second label and those only came with the second signature.
Confusing, I know, but the good news is that it doesn't affect value, partly because most people have no clue that there even were two signatures, or that the different light blue labels are actually different from one another.![]()
nick serdula said:The ebony titlist is too old! Sell it to me!
Nick![]()