This is your nit contention. It's a masse shot. What part of that do you think you've corrected? You keep hammering away like that's gonna change. Get some class dood.
how would ya hit it?
- Thread starter evergruven
- Start date
Actually I did not say that I do not know the shot.... I asked "Who knows the shot"? The answer is "reverse masse" as described in post #86.
I started the interchange? Paraphrasing here but Tennesseejoe said he thought the shot could be made with outside english but didn't know the secret to doing it that way and asked for the secret to making it with outside. You responded that the secret was masse and since you didn't specify otherwise you were clearly saying the secret to making it with outside was to use masse.
Poolplaya9 said:
I started the interchange? Paraphrasing here but Tennesseejoe said he thought the shot could be made with outside english but didn't know the secret to doing it that way and asked for the secret to making it with outside. You responded that the secret was masse and since you didn't specify otherwise you were clearly saying the secret to making it with outside was to use masse.
It is not an outside english masse shot the way everybody would automatically interpret that no matter how many times you want to continue to say it. Now it could be shot upwards to "reverse" the masse effect as Tennesseejoe explains in the previous post, but that isn't what you were talking about or at some point you would have explained that by saying something along the lines of "shooting upwards" and used the word "reverse" or similar just as he did when he talked about it. Wouldn't surprise me if you don't try to claim that is what you were talking about though as you tried to claim to have been talking about all kinds of things that are completely opposite of what you were actually saying which is the whole problem that you still don't get.
Last edited:
No chance we are arguing over the same thing. What I've been arguing is that what he was repeatedly saying, as said, was dumb and wrong, and if he really meant what he was saying exactly as he said it then it was a case of complete idiocy of belief, and if he actually meant something else other than what he was saying and just never realized it or couldn't or wouldn't communicate it even after all the prodding, then it was complete idiocy of comprehension and communication. Yes, as I've also intimated all along we don't have total certainly yet on which of the two was the case (which is a problem he caused and isn't smart enough to realize and clear up so either way his comprehension and communication has been a huge issue in any case which has been my point), but there is complete certainly that his absolute prolonged stupidity is the problem in either case.The best ones are when they're arguing over the same thing but just don't know it
Last edited:
See now, if you had responded to "It's a masse..." we'd be having a different conversation. So much ado over a shot that will never come up...
FWIW, Vern Peterson's bank goes, so can the <from the coping> shot - with outside. Maybe.
It's again <maybe> likely that you can double kiss it with outside and send it rolling to the hole. IDK.
Players celebrating themselves.
or what's left of it...