Renard,
Nice safety. Bad result.
On a bar table, I did not like the safety that SJM suggests - I think a good shooter makes the 1 ball much more often after that safety than he'll kick it in after yours. On a 9ft. table his safety becomes more attractive (but I would still try to snooker my opponent if he was a world-beater).
The point being of course is that sometimes there is more than one way to skin a cat - pick the way that you are most comfortable with. Also remember that SJM is about 10 times smarter than me when it comes to pool (and Charles Dickens trivia).
It is interesting that a professional friend of SJM's has recently been working with me on a bunch of soft safeties similar to this - and just lambasts me with verbal abuse if I don't execute properly. I think we would be expected to be able to hide behind the 8 with a fair percentage of success (but I also thought the Colts would be in the Super Bowl, so go figure).
Nice safety. Bad result.
On a bar table, I did not like the safety that SJM suggests - I think a good shooter makes the 1 ball much more often after that safety than he'll kick it in after yours. On a 9ft. table his safety becomes more attractive (but I would still try to snooker my opponent if he was a world-beater).
The point being of course is that sometimes there is more than one way to skin a cat - pick the way that you are most comfortable with. Also remember that SJM is about 10 times smarter than me when it comes to pool (and Charles Dickens trivia).
It is interesting that a professional friend of SJM's has recently been working with me on a bunch of soft safeties similar to this - and just lambasts me with verbal abuse if I don't execute properly. I think we would be expected to be able to hide behind the 8 with a fair percentage of success (but I also thought the Colts would be in the Super Bowl, so go figure).