I'm going to consider this thread from the vantage point of what the plan should be for the eight and nine before a single ball is hit.
I believe the best pattern is to play for the eight and the nine in the same corner pocket. Playing the pattern for the nine in the side is acceptable, but the position you'd need on the eight is slightly harder to get than the other pattern, which would just require the cue ball to be almost anywhere near the middle of the table.
Mike Mosconi is right in noting that eight and nine in the same corner offers a short position line, but that's only true if it is played one rail. The path from the eight to the nine would be two rails, not one, so as not to cut across the next position line, and if played this way, the position zone onto the nine will be absolutely huge, with tons of room for error in speed.
I think, to some extent, this is as much about the tendencies of today's players as anything, but eight and nine in the same corner is, to me, just slightly better than the alternative, which is still acceptable.
I believe the best pattern is to play for the eight and the nine in the same corner pocket. Playing the pattern for the nine in the side is acceptable, but the position you'd need on the eight is slightly harder to get than the other pattern, which would just require the cue ball to be almost anywhere near the middle of the table.
Mike Mosconi is right in noting that eight and nine in the same corner offers a short position line, but that's only true if it is played one rail. The path from the eight to the nine would be two rails, not one, so as not to cut across the next position line, and if played this way, the position zone onto the nine will be absolutely huge, with tons of room for error in speed.
I think, to some extent, this is as much about the tendencies of today's players as anything, but eight and nine in the same corner is, to me, just slightly better than the alternative, which is still acceptable.
Last edited: