ding dingIf you mean poking the cueball into the opponent's ball, no it is not.
If you mean poking the opponent's ball intentionally, this is a sportsmanship violation
ding dingIf you mean poking the cueball into the opponent's ball, no it is not.
If you mean poking the opponent's ball intentionally, this is a sportsmanship violation
Yes. That also includes the cue ball. If you strike a frozen (declaired) object ball with the cue ball, and then cue ball touches the same rail the OB was frozen to, it's a good hit. However you have to be careful the cue hits the object ball first.The BCAPL allows the frozen ball to hit another ball and then return to the cushion. The WPA rules do not require another ball to be the reason for the return. Also, the BCAPL/CSI rules allow a frozen ball to rattle between the jaws of the side pocket and counts that as a rail even though the frozen ball did not contact some other ball (see page 88 in the CSI rules).
(The BCA is very different from the BCAPL. The BCA uses the WPA World Standardized Rules.)
I agree. I think they misunderstood the rule in the first place and thought that it meant CB and/or OB had to be driven to a different rail. I argued with the TD about it but to no avail. I wish I could remember exactly where it was but it was 1995-2000-ish. So based on where I was living maybe in Kansas, Ohio, Denver, Atlanta, San Francisco or Chicago. Hopefully that narrows it down. lol.I think whoever put that rule in didn't understand that if the cue ball contacts a cushion after the object ball, the sequence is unlikely to go on for long. I can't think of a situation where it wouldn't end fairly quickly.
Related to which, I think there's a video of Efren playing one pocket. The cue ball is frozen to the foot rail and also frozen to an object ball on the rail and they are pointed at his opponent's pocket. He shoots a masse shot, moving the OB a little and the cue ball goes around and freezes on the other side of the object ball. It would be a crime for that shot to be ruled a foul.I agree. I think they misunderstood the rule in the first place and thought that it meant CB and/or OB had to be driven to a different rail. I argued with the TD about it but to no avail. I wish I could remember exactly where it was but it was 1995-2000-ish. So based on where I was living maybe in Kansas, Ohio, Denver, Atlanta, San Francisco or Chicago. Hopefully that narrows it down. lol.
I would like to see a video clip of that!Related to which, I think there's a video of Efren playing one pocket. The cue ball is frozen to the foot rail and also frozen to an object ball on the rail and they are pointed at his opponent's pocket. He shoots a masse shot, moving the OB a little and the cue ball goes around and freezes on the other side of the object ball. It would be a crime for that shot to be ruled a foul.
IThat depends on the location and the opponent. In some bars you don't want to start that stuff. I used to play in a bar league where there was a rule: No Safes! Really. And that's the way we played.
But yes, if you play by the official rules or in any of the main leagues, safety play is allowed and sometimes cheered. There is the ball-in-hand issue which the OP seemed to be unaware of.
As long as it is a legal shot there is no problem.Hey folks,
So you're playing a game and you've got no shot. Nothing. But you could tap the ball a few inches forward, maybe leaving it in the center of a cluster of balls, for no other purpose other than to ruin any potential shot that your opponent may have. Is this considered bad form/cheap or is it part of the game?
Thanks
Sometimes if there is a cluster, I won't break it up and just pocket the closest opponents ball so he has a harder time when given BIH. It is not bad sportsmanship at all, but a strategy to win the game.It depends. In BCAPL, safes are a legal shot. But.... intentionally fouling, as in shooting directly at your opponents ball to tie it up, is considered a sportsmanship violation.
In the bar league I mentioned above where there was a "No Safes!" rule, all of the top players played by the rule. Occasionally there was a clever, old codger who would pull the "Oops, I missed" trick. They didn't play well enough to win, so no one said anything. No handicaps.In line with Bob’s comment, I usually won’t play a safety when playing in a bar, unless I can make it look like a “lucky leave” or if the opponent happens to be a league player (rare).
Yes, that’s considered “cheating pool” in a bar situation or in a social game with beginners.Hey folks,
So you're playing a game and you've got no shot. Nothing. But you could tap the ball a few inches forward, maybe leaving it in the center of a cluster of balls, for no other purpose other than to ruin any potential shot that your opponent may have. Is this considered bad form/cheap or is it part of the game?
Thanks
Unlike days past most bar players today are hip to the rules due to league play and the concept of playing safe. When i first started what you said is dead on, it better look like luck or you may be in a fight.In line with Bob’s comment, I usually won’t play a safety when playing in a bar, unless I can make it look like a “lucky leave” or if the opponent happens to be a league player (rare).
Or Watching YouTubeUnlike days past most bar players today are hip to the rules due to league play and the concept of playing safe. When i first started what you said is dead on, it better look like luck or you may be in a fight.
It depends. In BCAPL, safes are a legal shot. But.... intentionally fouling, as in shooting directly at your opponents ball to tie it up, is considered a sportsmanship violation.
This is very confusing(The BCA is very different from the BCAPL. The BCA uses the WPA World Standardized Rules.)
I believe I clarified that In post 19Are you sure about that? I don't know of any league or official rule where an intentional foul, done with a proper cue stroke and hitting the cueball first, is an unsportsmanlike foul. Now if you actually strike an object ball directly, I can see that, but not if you hit a cueball. Especially in BCA which is one of leagues the better players play in.
Sure it is. More pool politics.This is very confusing (BCA vs. BCAPL)
Some unintelligent people think three fouling people is cheating at pool. I would suspect the same people would frown upon this tooIt's called a safety, and is a normal part of pool. But you have to hit a legal object ball and get a ball to a rail or it's a foul.
![]()
Rules
Navigate the rules and regulations of pool with ease. Stay informed and play fair with WPA Rules!wpapool.com
pj
chgo