Your questions weren’t about a given shot. We are only talking about center cb at this point.That's all I was saying. Hence what you guys are describing is a shifted overlay for a given shot? That doesn't sound correct though.
Your questions weren’t about a given shot. We are only talking about center cb at this point.That's all I was saying. Hence what you guys are describing is a shifted overlay for a given shot? That doesn't sound correct though.
Speeder said something like <the center moved right?> Besides all the stuff he can't explain I couldn't let a physical impossibility pass. Note, I still don't get the context of this facet of the Shuffett Shuffle. But it seems like you get in position, then fidget with how you look at the shot and then both hands align themselves and make the shot.Put a dot on the CB where your line of sight passes through on its way to the 3D center. Now move a step to the side and aim centerball again - you're once again aiming through the center of the visible surface, but are you aiming at the dot?
Semantics. Are you sure you're not Duckie?
pj
chgo
No. Now that we've established moving your head doesn't change the shot, I'm asking what the shift does. (?)Your questions weren’t about a given shot. We are only talking about center cb at this point.
I don’t think we established that at all. Moving your head does change the way you see the shot.No. Now that we've established moving your head doesn't change the shot, I'm asking what the shift does. (?)
There is no fidgeting with CTE. You are getting CTE confused with PJ’s methodSpeeder said something like <the center moved right?> Besides all the stuff he can't explain I couldn't let a physical impossibility pass. Note, I still don't get the context of this facet of the Shuffett Shuffle. But it seems like you get in position, then fidget with how you look at the shot and then both hands align themselves and make the shot.
Actually, you’re getting Spiderbrain’s nonsense “put downs” confused with reality. Not that surprising, I guess, for people who believe CTE’s fantasy claims.There is no fidgeting with CTE. You are getting CTE confused with PJ’s method
Actually, reality is exactly what his post is about you and fidgeting. Are you going to claim you never made a postActually, you’re getting Spiderbrain’s nonsense “put downs” confused with reality. Not that surprising, I guess, for people who believe CTE’s fantasy claims.
pj
chgo
Your description of yourself not mine. I wasn’t putting you down for it, hey if it works for you that’s fine with meActually, you’re getting Spiderbrain’s nonsense “put downs” confused with reality. Not that surprising, I guess, for people who believe CTE’s fantasy claims.
pj
chgo
According to the obvious chip on Spider's shoulder. I thought you were at least more honest than him.Your description of yourself not mine.
So quote it, Brainiac.Actually, reality is exactly what his post is about you and fidgeting. Are you going to claim you never made a post
how your head goes up and down (or maybe it was side to side) like a LIZARD? That was YOU that made the post!
Neither of these is true - but of course you know that.The only fantasy is YOU thinking you can actually play pool and hang with just about anyone for the cash. The REALITY is:
1. You never play for cash
2. You can't play worth crap
Undoubtedly. At least I don't have to lie for mine.3. Your ego far exceeds reality
You never described your aiming approach as lizard like head movements?According to the obvious chip on Spider's shoulder. I thought you were at least more honest than him.
pj <- live and learn
chgo
What's wrong with doing that anyway? If a technique genuinely helps you to zero in on the aimline then why not use it?You never described your aiming approach as lizard like head movements?
How about if it puts you on the OB line to the POCKET like CTE does, is that the same as the aimline or even better? Which isWhat's wrong with doing that anyway? If a technique genuinely helps you to zero in on the aimline then why not use it?
You won't be having to apologize. I'll post it twice, once here and again answering his post since he said to do it.If you haven’t and I’m wrong I will apologize
I was anticipating your reply which is why I inserted the word "genuinely."How about if it puts you on the OB line to the POCKET like CTE does, is that the same as the aimline or even better? Which is
our thoughts, why not use it?
Going up and down, side to side like a lizard does make one look kinda like a total hack fool though.
Your wish is MY PLEASURE. See below, weasel liar.So quote it, Brainiac.
Wanna bet?Neither of these is true - but of course you know that.
From: Patrick Johnson <REMOV...@21stcentury.net>Undoubtedly. At least I don't have to lie for mine.
pj
chgo
CTE "GENUINELY" puts the OB directly on the correct shot line to the pocket and GENUINELY puts the CB contacting the OB at impact to send it on the shot line to the pocket if one knows how to visually align them like other aiming systems.I was anticipating your reply which is why I inserted the word "genuinely."
I know exactly what it does...it makes balls go straight into the pocket when you know how to use it and set up correctly just like any other aiming system. For those of us who DO USE IT, it's just more CONSISTENT than other aiming systems. Why wouldn't we use CTE for that reason? What do YOU think it does since you haven't the faintest clue how to set up with it?I know this is going to trigger you but everything does so what the heck? I really don't think professional players who use CTE and teach CTE and guys like Randy believe CTE does what you think it does.
No, they would say exactly what I said above. But whatever they would say, you'd disregard their answer, not believe them, and start countering their response with some half assed hair brained crap that you guys have been spouting off for 25 years.I think if I had a 1 on 1 conversation at a table they would say "Well this is how I use it" or "It promotes consistency," or something like that.
That's it? lolYour wish is MY PLEASURE. See below, weasel liar.
Wanna bet?
From: Patrick Johnson <REMOV...@21stcentury.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:32:45 -0500
Local: Tues, Sep 12 2000 3:32 pm
We've talked about this a few times. I prefer to sight down the
contact point-to-contact point line, but that puts my head in
different positions over the stick depending on the shot and can be
physically difficult for cue ball contact points "outside" the stick,
so I adjust it for comfort and consistency. I also like to move my
head back and forth to sight down more than one of the available
lines, including cue ball path, just for cross reference (I might look
a little like a lizard doing this). I like to know that my stick is
pointing where I want it to, but "sight down the stick" doesn't work
by itself for me.
Pat Johnson
Chicago
I never said anything was wrong with it. But it’s people like you that complain about movement when down on the shot.What's wrong with doing that anyway? If a technique genuinely helps you to zero in on the aimline then why not use it?