He's a failed artist, I think. He needs a platform
Is Max Eberle as big as a goof as I now think?
- Thread starter BmoreMoney
- Start date
He's a failed artist, I think. He needs a platform
Hey E,
Check this out. This doesnt add up.
small+ $5000 = fake
And fake is < real
So small + $5000 < small?
They are essentially adding to something yet taking away from its value at the same time.:smile:
Check this out. This doesnt add up.
small+ $5000 = fake
And fake is < real
So small + $5000 < small?
They are essentially adding to something yet taking away from its value at the same time.:smile:
In Hebrew, 'God and Math' are the same.. (Theomatics) So yes God is everywhere.. "do the (language) Math". :-0.... Not that that changes anything for anyone but like most religious beliefs its a 'fun fact' to ponder.
Now back to the bar thing... where are these 'math genius' pool players showing up? I think I may have an opportunity for them...:smile:
Now back to the bar thing... where are these 'math genius' pool players showing up? I think I may have an opportunity for them...:smile:
Who cares?
That's an interesting angle, never thought of that.
I NEVER said that it WAS man's greatest INVENTION.
I merely said that 'math' is man made & that we devised it.
There is always going to be those that will argue on BOTH sides of any question that is asked. There will never be 100% total agreement by every living intelligent human being.
Gravity existed from it's inception but the formulas used to explain it have not. They were devised by us so as to explain what gravity is.
The principle of gravity was always there & we came to realize it, or 'discover' it. We then set out to define it & in doing so we 'assigned' numbers to it.
Every living being has gravity & live with it & can use it but every living being does no have the mathematical knowledge to know how to represent it. That must be learned from other human beings.
When an alien lands & discusses gravity with us they will more than likely say, 'No, your math is wrong. It's pull is not 32 ft. per sec. It's 2 drakmas per appendage step.'.
Their math & our math will be describing the same scientific principle but in different 'math' that was devised (&created) independently.
Last edited:
I don't speak Hebrew but that is not what I got when I looked up Theomatics.
Theo is Greek for God & matics means math so the word Theomatics means the numbers or math of God.
Theomatics also refers to the Hewbrew study of numbers in the Bible.
I don't thing the Hebrews called or referred to God by the name of Theomatics.
Everyone that has made a post regarding it.
You made 4 posts about it before this one when you thought you were an obvious winner regarding the discussion.
Now it's, who cares.
Oh, I forgot you live in your own little reality that you alone define.
Best Wishes.
I just thought of something. I forget what its called but there is a phenomenon where two moons appear in our sky side by side due to atmospheric reflection or something or the other. Could someone PLEASE post a pic of this to Max's FB !
Winner? Is there a prize? Did I drop out too early?
Damn. Always finishing out of the money on these threads. Why can't someone just post the damn prize list at the beginning of the thread so we all know what's at stake???
If we both understand the math correctly then the math will be the same, even if the way we symbolically represent it is different.
I think what you are referring to is not 'the math' but the scientific principle.
Physics is not math & math is not physics.
Our math is the language that we use to communicate the physics to each other.
If another society (aliens) have another different math then we would not be able to communicate the physics to them without an interpreter or translation of some kind.
Yet... the scientific principles would be the same for both.
Perhaps if we turned it around & we went to them, we would not understand the math of their world & their gravity would be different than ours. We understand the scientific principle of gravity but we would not understand the math they use to represent their gravity.
Best Wishes.
Is this why I learned that x and y shit in high school
The math is not the same thing as the language. The language is used to represent the math, and math is not the same thing as physics.
For example, I can represent a certain mathematical equation in both of the following ways:
Two plus three equals five.
2+3=5.
Here I've represented a particular mathematical equation in two different ways symbolically. The math is the abstract equation, not the language I used to represent or express the equation. And that equation is not physics, it's math. We can represent principles of physics mathematically, but that does not mean that math and physics are the same thing.
Confusing the language with what it represents is like saying the word "elephant" is an elephant.
Okay, lets back up a step or two to be clear.
Are you saying that math is a science that is natural & real & that we, mankind, had nothing to do with it's formation?
Thanks in advance.
I don't typically think of mathematics as a science, since it's certainly not an empirical field, but I'm not sure how much hinges philosophically on whether or not we think of math as a science or not as long as we understand the difference between empirical hypotheses and mathematical hypotheses (for example, in the way that we test them).
I think mathematical truths are better understood as having been discovered by us than as having been invented by us. We didn't simply stipulate that 2+3=5, I think we discovered that 2+3=5, to use a simple example.
We need language in order to express mathematical truths, but the mathematical truths themselves are not mere semantic stipulations, like "All bachelors are unmarried" would be.
Here's the entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on the philosophy of mathematics, if you're interested:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/philosophy-mathematics/
The initial assertion was that math is man made & not a natural 'real' 'entity' as are the other sciences & that we use math as a means of explaining the other 'real' sciences. Now we are to a point of philosophy regarding math.
Nothing I have seen has convinced me that I am incorrect.
God's math may be present in everything & that was another point that I made.
So... it's quite possible that we have invented our math & also are discovering God's Math or Natural Math & they may certainly intersect.
I think the following is a fair & more simple explanation & gives a reasonable indication that while it is not beyond reproach I think rational logic indicates we've formulated OUR math as we discover matters that OUR math can not prove.
http://science.howstuffworks.com/math-concepts/math4.htm
Best Wishes.
Last edited:
............
Last edited:
