He's not wrong you know there are a lot of fake people and cowards out on the social media platforms, but I am not one of them! I spent a couple too many years in the US. ARMY (22 years 6 months and 19 days but who's counting)
Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit
- Thread starter Dan Harriman
- Start date
- Status
Part of your post is bull shee-toe, specifically the part about trying to discredit John.
But thank you for the compliment about word smithing : -)
Lou Figueroa
Maybe you did, and maybe you didn't
Sorry, can't help myself. And yes, you are quite the wordsmith, always a fun read, regardless of the motivation
Maybe you did, and maybe you didn't
Sorry, can't help myself. And yes, you are quite the wordsmith, always a fun read, regardless of the motivation
lol, fair enough, dub.
And thank you for the kind words.
Lou Figueroa
He has taken his fantasy of being able to 'scientifically' become a good pool player too far.
He thinks there is some way he can eliminate the execution element of the game.
Not sure why he doesn't justdum pretend he was the Mosconi cup mvp.
Im sorry xretardx but I have never laid claim to being on Johns side on this matter. I know it might be hard for someone with a 2nd grade reading level education to understand but my exact words were as written by me in post #5843
"As far as the 626 record, I couldn't care less, its legitimacy or lack thereof affects me in no manner whatsoever. After reading a lot of the replies here I'm not sure why it affects you, did you shoot 625 or something?? At any rate whatever I say is just as you described, an opinion, in the grand scheme of things opinions make no difference and most people know what is said about opinions, everyone has one and they are the same as an as..................,
" Once again as I explained to you in an earlier post I have no dog in this fight, I couldn't care less if the 626 is legit or not, if you find evidence to the contrary please share with us. If there is something here that you do not understand feel free to ask and I will try to explain it in early reader form to help you out, seems like you could use the help and I am feeling generous.
Ya calmate guey,
Go get laid or something
Did that one REAL bca instructor talk some sense into ol Dan over tea? He's been quite, or is he only allowed at the library a few days of the week?
I sent him a message with no response. To think that Danny can't teach you would be sadly mistaken, believe it or not I took a few lessons from Danny back in 2009, he is excellent at teaching. He did learn from Jerry Brieseth.
That's not what this thread and it's content is about though, Danny's abilities, which really, not many would question.
telinoz
Registered
Ah, but that is why this thread exists.
His ability was questioned, by the team that picked Shaw et al.
Danny was deemed, not good enough to break 400.
So, he was passed over.
Now you have 302 pages and over 6000 posts of butthurt ego recovery.
Not exactly true. The 1st tier is for players that have won a World Championship in which Danny did not meet the criteria.Danny was listed on our 2nd tier list and I let him know this. When he asked how much he would be getting paid and travel and hotel expenses I told him he would get none of that and also would not pay an entry fee either. At that point Danny hung up the phone and turned against us out of frustration and started to trash talk. Danny had or has the ability to play at a high level but trashing our event and me & Lou won't get you in any door to play in any of our events.
telinoz
Registered
I was close enough.
But, this does prove the point.
As for the other reason about this thread.
Until JS releases his video, there will always be doubt and a big cloud over his 626.
What do you mean you were "close enough"?
telinoz said: "Ah, but that is why this thread exists." Wrong.
telinoz said: "His ability was questioned, by the team that picked Shaw et al". Wrong.
telinoz said: "Danny was deemed, not good enough to break 400. So, he was passed over." Wrong.
Lou Figueroa
not even close
telinoz
Registered
We have been through this. Schmidt could have and still can release an unedited video and the public would buy it and he can make lots of money. The question is why doesn't he?
Does he hate money?
Is the run real?
Is the run real but doesn't want it compared to Jaysons legit run.
Will it expose him as a cheater which he already is anyways?
Is the video pieced together?
My guess is all of the above and many more.
We have sold over 1700 videos and 600 packages.
Jayson has earned every dollar and he doesn't hate money.
Chill out?
lol, if you think anything you write here could increase my blood pressure by even a millimeter of mercury you would be: wrong.
Lou Figueroa
again
mate
Flailing and rigidly incurious iconoclasts in former days greatly enjoyed the bumblebee flight myth: the idea that engineers have proved that bumblebees can’t fly, or that bumblebee flight is not consistent with known aerodynamics. The idea is that bumblebee’s wings are too small for the size of their bodies. Since they do fly, there is obviously something interesting going on – bumblebees can generate more lift from their wings (a higher lift coefficient) than conventional aerodynamic methods should allow. They must be using some unconventional aerodynamics, if we can exploit the same aerodynamics we might be able to shift more air with smaller wings or propellers. Smaller cooling fans in computers, for example.
The aerodynamics of bumblebee flight were solved in the early 2000s, and modern computational fluid dynamics can accurately model insect flapping flight. Amazingly, the key is unsteady aerodynamics and leading edge vortices. Insects like bumblebees flap their wings so that a leading-edge-vortex forms above the wing and is stably held there for the duration of the downstroke. The high speed rotating flow within a vortex generates really low pressure – this is why air gets sucked down the middle of a plughole vortex. A great common, everyday human example of this, is when tea/coffee drinkers use leading edge vortices to mix milk and tea/coffee, forming the vortex over the back of the spoon by sweeping it across the teacup at an appropriate angle of attack relative to the tea.
Recent dragonfly drones, make use of those unconventional high lift aerodynamics to hover, in a stable manner and to cope with turbulence and gusty winds.
Arnaldo ~ Point is, myths asserted about 14.1 records can be either confirmed or disproven, proportionate to your acceptable arsenal of facts that reliably and indisputably make your case.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The aerodynamics of bumblebee flight were solved in the early 2000s, and modern computational fluid dynamics can accurately model insect flapping flight. Amazingly, the key is unsteady aerodynamics and leading edge vortices. Insects like bumblebees flap their wings so that a leading-edge-vortex forms above the wing and is stably held there for the duration of the downstroke. The high speed rotating flow within a vortex generates really low pressure – this is why air gets sucked down the middle of a plughole vortex. A great common, everyday human example of this, is when tea/coffee drinkers use leading edge vortices to mix milk and tea/coffee, forming the vortex over the back of the spoon by sweeping it across the teacup at an appropriate angle of attack relative to the tea.
Recent dragonfly drones, make use of those unconventional high lift aerodynamics to hover, in a stable manner and to cope with turbulence and gusty winds.
Arnaldo ~ Point is, myths asserted about 14.1 records can be either confirmed or disproven, proportionate to your acceptable arsenal of facts that reliably and indisputably make your case.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
It is possible for compression to exist for 14.1 tight racks?
Template racks ensure balls are in contact. Not all types of contact are the same. Any discussion for types of contact is out of the scope of this thread.
I would hate to lose people if they lack the knowledge base for the discussion.
Template racks ensure balls are in contact. Not all types of contact are the same. Any discussion for types of contact is out of the scope of this thread.
I would hate to lose people if they lack the knowledge base for the discussion.
- Status