I am transcribing Dans ideas to the page in pdf.
Being supportive is a quality of a human. Unlike the toxic band of secret police active on this thread.
Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit
- Thread starter Dan Harriman
- Start date
- Status
I am transcribing Dans ideas to the page in pdf.
Being supportive is a quality of a human. Unlike the toxic band of secret police active on this thread.
And then you must know who the prior front runners were?
Who'?
When is Danny's children's 14.1 book coming out, you had us all sold with the promo pic? When's it available?
A few more months, translations are being done so it can be the first billiard book printed in multiple languages and multiple alphabets.
Wrong. The most significant 14.1 event in the US in 2009 was the Predator World 14.1 Championship. It had a considerably stronger field and more prize money than did the Maryland event. Stephan Cohen defeated Mika Immonen in the Finals. The Semifinal losers were Ortmann and Archer. A few of the other entrants were Hohmann, Robles, Eckert, Eberle, Deuel, Hopkins, Williams.
The European Pool Championships have been held every year since 1980 (except 2020, Covid). The men's winner in straight pool in 2009 was Dmitri Jungo, defeating Niels Feijen.
So, no, Danny Harriman is not a world champion in 14.1, even in the way you stated.
And, by the way, the commentator you referenced was not Grady Seasons, a fictional pool player, but Grady Mathews, a decidedly real pool player now deceased (who also played in that 2009 "World" event.)
Last edited:
Your efforts to rewrite history are as valid as my rights.
The WPA officially claims there was no world champion in 2009.
My statement still holds valid, if the WPA did not award a 14.1 world champion title, then it can be debated for ages.
The claim Dan Harriman won a world champsionship in 2009 still holds valid.
Your argument about Predator 14.1 on 2009 is equally valid. Were the players on the Maryland 2009 and the Predator 2009 events rated by Fargorate, for that year? If they were than what is the Fargo analysis of the player fields?
Mentioning names of pool players is always possible, Fargo analysis provides a uniform basis for equal comparison. Do you have it?
All World Championships have to be sanctioned through the WPA with a minimum of $60,000 in added prize money. In 2009 the Maryland state 14.1 didn't even have $5,000 in added money to the event.
To note Danny Harriman won that Tournament and only played because the tournament director payed his way and entry fees. The next year Peter Burrows did not pay Danny's way and Danny wouldn't play.
As per my event I told Danny he could play but on the 2nd tier of players because he hasn't won a World championship and he asked me if I would pay his expenses and I told him NO. Danny then hung up on me and has talked shit ever sense.
So to say Danny needs a handout in order to compete is 100% true.
Danny has a nice handout if he grows some balls and play Jayson Shaw a set of 1 pocket as he said he would recently. So how about it Danny? Jayson accepts your offer and we can post up instantly the same day you accept. You can bet as much as you want but no less that 10k and a race to 25. We would like to start at 25k but don't want to high roll you and scare you off. Justnumnutsack can bet also if he wants.
Truly absurd logic.
FargoRates for this purpose are unwarranted. Just look at the lists of the players in the money for the two events. If you don't see the significant difference, then .....................
I think you may have just locked up the 2022 World Championship of Convoluted Nonsense.
You have a grand total of one other person on the forum who thinks there is even a tiny bit of validity to your position...and he's maybe just a bit biased.
Sent using Tapatalk
Just don't have a book signing with Danny being around children.
And when that happens the planet will finally collectively agree that he does in fact hold a World Championship.
Sent using Tapatalk
You should run it by an English teacher at that college of yours.
The toxic band of secret police active in the thread?
Are you transcribing his ideas or adopting his paranoia?
Sent using Tapatalk
You know Justdum doesn't deal well with facts.
Before every big match up is the pre match show.
Instead of blowing the load on one show, I propose a pre match show.
The prematch show is each player gets three tries from their homeroom and livestreamed.
As Dan's promoter Jayson and Dan will each be given a chance to have a high run. Each player will have alternating attempts and the player not attempting does live commentary.
We can talk money when the details are ironed out.
Before any details let's put some money in Escrow. We are not dealing with broke people. If you want to play then show us the money.
We will play a 14.1 match to 1,000 and or a 1 pocket race to 25. Bet as high as you want but minimum 10k each match.
No twisting or turning or non sense so stay on subject as I have just written if that's possible.
ACL
Well-known member
Now that you finally stated to me you would put whatever it is you live in (or under), I will put up mine. The question is what your abode is worth and how you're going to make up the difference in value between mine and yours. Balls are in your court sporto (or are those justnum's).
ACL
Well-known member
While I hope this actually happens, it will be a cold day in hell when it does. Danny boy doesn't have the means or the marbles.
Thats how multiple home repair services contractors cheated me out of money.
Rule discussion first for a pre match virtual stream followed by a live money match.
All terms discussed up front. Those are the required conditions to begin any further discussion.
First up is the pre match conditions and rules.
This way it will be settled who has the best high run streamed exhibition.
How much action do you want for the virtual contest?
If you talk a good game, we can discuss the live match next.
- Status