Paul Schofield calls his method “no conflict”...
...the breaker shoots after his own break whether he makes a ball or not.
...eliminates any racking arguments.
I’m not a fan of this, I consider pool to be a war game, like chess....
...you fight your opponent, within the rules, of course.
This no conflict tames the game down, IMO, making it more like a practise drill....
...playing the ghost.
Me?....I like to three-foul a guy once in a while...:angry:
So, if you are racking for your opponent, do you screw him as thoroughly as he will let you? If racking for yourself, do you rack one dead? I've seen a major tournament won by an "I'll rack one dead for myself" guy.