Banks are a mirror reflection of straight in, or cut shots
Banking, like ball pocketing requires a system to increase the margin of error. I use TOI and/or TOO (spin) to do this on regular shots, John "holds" the banks to achieve the same outcome.
It's really about the "approach angle," like in golf they use "draw and fade" to create the same increased margin of error. In tennis they use over-spin, under-spin, and some side-spin on serves.
Both ways requires is to over-cut the shots slightly, then force it into the center of the pocket. Ask John and I'm sure he'll tell you that he favors a side of the pocket, although, he's going to to favor the opposite side for banks than I do for regular shots. Banks are a mirror reflection of straight in, or cut shots, so this does fit in nicely with the theme of this thread.
Like you, JB wasn't showing disrespect. He's said openly on here (paraphrasing one of his recent post about BHE) "I don't know what you're talking about, I just play pool". Many pros don't know/can't explain how/why, etc. This was very evident on one of the prematch TAR podcast with Bustamante. Was anything PJ wrote not accurate?
Banking, like ball pocketing requires a system to increase the margin of error. I use TOI and/or TOO (spin) to do this on regular shots, John "holds" the banks to achieve the same outcome.
It's really about the "approach angle," like in golf they use "draw and fade" to create the same increased margin of error. In tennis they use over-spin, under-spin, and some side-spin on serves.
Both ways requires is to over-cut the shots slightly, then force it into the center of the pocket. Ask John and I'm sure he'll tell you that he favors a side of the pocket, although, he's going to to favor the opposite side for banks than I do for regular shots. Banks are a mirror reflection of straight in, or cut shots, so this does fit in nicely with the theme of this thread.