Thanks for all the hateful replies.
I know queenie is worshiped here, but there is more positive to my post than any of you realize.
I was harsh in my post, but there is rational behind it. If a person wants to write a good biography, it is essential to be fair to both sides. That is to say that one's bias shouldn't shine through blatantly. A bias can be shown in the culmination of the work, but my experience with JAM's posts about keith is that she makes him a demigod. A biography should show the bad as well as the good. The biography should definitely lead people to one side or the other, but it shouldn't leave out the bad to show the good.
For instance, 'Walk the Line', which I'm sure all of you have probably seen...Johnny Cash himself refused to give rights to his biography and subsequent biopic because he was afraid that they wouldn't portray his bad side fairly, or worse, at all.
So, I am reminded of a recent post of JAM's where she showed a shot that keith made and asked if it was on purpose or not. I didn't even have to look at the shot to know two things: First it was an amazing shot; Second that JAM was going to reply that he meant to make it all along.
To anyone who has played this game, it was DOWNRIGHT INSULTING to say that he meant to make it without acknowledging the fact that he still left the shot safe if he had missed. Did Keith make an amazing shot? Absolutely. Did he want the ball to drop? Probably? Did he play an absolute great safe if he had missed? Totally.
And there is the crux. A biography written by someone who has repeatedly said that pro players are abused by their fans is treading a difficult line if she wants to write a substantive biography.
Maybe many of you have watched 'Breaking Bad'. I did and it is the absolute best television ever made. The writing wasn't always the best, the cinematography wasn't perfect, but there was an 'it' factor with the show: The main character was shown to be lovable, honest and good in the first season, but then he went downhill. The audience still wanted to love him, but found themselves questioning things...like: Is it okay to cook meth if you know the meth-heads will find it regardless and you are doing it to help your family?
So, everyone of you who said I was a rude jackass or some kind of worthless human for posting this should go back and see that I offered CONSTRUCTIVE criticism. The book hasn't been published yet and it still has time to avoid the trap of the hero-worship we all know JAM has for Keith.
The goal of this book has always been is to make it a good read for everyone, not just pool peeps. In this regard, I hope it succeeds. We will offer 50 signed copies in a galley format before the final published version is released.
This is where it stands now. We have some wrinkles to iron out before we can move forward. Thanks again to those with the kind words and for acknowledging Keith's book.
I was harsh in my post, but there is rational behind it. If a person wants to write a good biography, it is essential to be fair to both sides. That is to say that one's bias shouldn't shine through blatantly. A bias can be shown in the culmination of the work, but my experience with JAM's posts about keith is that she makes him a demigod. A biography should show the bad as well as the good. The biography should definitely lead people to one side or the other, but it shouldn't leave out the bad to show the good.
Ah, thanks. Or 'yes'. The font colour is everything, it seems.
Anyway, allow me to rephrase: is JAM a professional writer? Genuine question. I'm not trying to be snipey.
The font color means everything when you need maximum attention, lol.
JAM is not a professional writer, in the traditional sense. She does spend a lot of time typing and transcribing words in her day job, tho.
Eric >I'll buy a copy
She's a typist, then.
That might be a bit one sided.
All I know is that if someone deals with transcribing words, then you have great familiarity with spoken language/grammar/sentence structure, etc. Now, does that translate into one having the artistic talent to write a creative and imaginative piece of fiction? Probably not, but...Keiths autobio is not a fiction. Actually, if you think about it, JAM would be transcribing Keith's stories (which is very similar to what she does in her day job).
Eric
Just curious JAM, will there be a centerfold?:happydance: I'm thinking something like that Burt Reynolds layout.....
Of Keith?... let me get THAT image out of my mind...![]()
That might be a bit one sided.
All I know is that if someone deals with transcribing words, then you have great familiarity with spoken language/grammar/sentence structure, etc. Now, does that translate into one having the artistic talent to write a creative and imaginative piece of fiction? Probably not, but...Keiths autobio is not a fiction. Actually, if you think about it, JAM would be transcribing Keith's stories (which is very similar to what she does in her day job).
Eric
Makes me wonder......I wonder if some stories Keith just couldnt tell JAM. I know my wife knows alot of antics, but she sure as hell doesnt know all of them.
Think about that for a while.
Ken![]()
I have to spread it around before I can give you more greenies.
I remember when I first started toyed with the idea of writing a book, I had no idea what was involved. In fact, Eric, you are one of the first people I spoke to about this project in 2002 at that tournament in NYC.:grin:
Phil Capelle told me that one of his instructional books on pool took him 6 months to finish. He is, of course, a professional writer -- and very good one at that. :yes:
Some actors never read reviews of their performances in plays on Broadway. No matter what happens on this forum, the AzBilliards forum trolls and banned members posting will find fault, criticizing a project before anything ever comes to fruition.
For sure, Eric, you are going to be one of the 50 who gets a personalized galley copy. You've been on this virtual ride with me since the beginning of my pool journey with Keith, and I have always valued and appreciated your friendship. :smile:
Best to you and yours.