There is another aspect to it as well, the way in which the record was set. Mosconis run was during an exhibition that got extended on prompting from the crowd, which was of a considerable size. It's not at all the same thing as some guy setting out to break the record, with numerous attempts over and over again, with only a few guys watching. The record is the record, but Mosconis record will always have a special place in history.Part of the 526's appeal was that it harkened back to a fondly remembered era of pool. Guys played in suits and ran 100s at an elegant game. You saw the comments, in real time, as Jayson was raining 100s, that his patterns weren't as good as the giants of yesteryear as he was beating the high runs of those same players. Because it stood for so long, a myth grew up around 526 that it was so venerated, the game so complicated, it couldn't be done again. The old days *were* better.
Of course it wasn't true, but people felt good believing it. It could have been done in the 70s or 80s, but why? Jayson correctly described it as "torture."
I'm glad the record is broken, it needed to happen for pool and straight pool especially. I'm even more glad that John Schmidts record was broken and we now can finally see the record run with our own eyes, without fast forward sections and in the privacy of our own homes. As an European I had no realistic chance of ever seeing John Schmidts run and I must admit it made me quite angry. This time it will all be different. I even got to witness the end of the run live, which was great.
Congratulations to Jayson Shaw.