THis thread should be a sticky.
I guess I don't get your point. Is it any wonder why people say that there are cue snobs here?nick serdula said:If you get about 20 more cues that hit a ton then add them all together and then spend oh lets say $3,500 on a Cochran cue then you will know what I am talking about maybe!
cubswin said:while I dislike duke as much as the next, why do you need to mention Bob Dzuricky in the post? I mean I know he is Duke's favorite maker, but that shouldn't be a slight on dz cue's should it?
1pRoscoe said:I'm truly blown away at your collection..... Nice...
nick serdula said:You tried to roast my nuts I see.
I never tried to roast your nuts.
When you find out you are very wrong about statements you made in my playing cue thread I will expect no apologies from you.
I didn't make any comments about your playing cue, I did try to explain what you obviously were not able to convey in words. If I was wrong in my explination it would only be because I didn't personally talk to Mike, Tim or hold the cue. I also never made any bad remarks about the cue since I happen to LOVE Tim and Mike, and I also think they do some of the best work in the cue biz, Tim is a Hall of Famer IMO.
If you get about 20 more cues that hit a ton then add them all together and then spend oh lets say $3,500 on a Cochran cue then you will know what I am talking about maybe!
I'm sure I know more about what you are talking about then you'll ever know, but that doesn't change anything that I've said to you.
That is not alot of money to us
Who is US?? and what are you talking about???
but I wounder if you hit with a great cue how would you know it was as good as your Muecci's?
I'll have to ask you again, DO YOU REALIZE THAT HIT IS SUBJECTIVE???
It is like Dennis Searing and I said to each other one day
You said this to each other?? or is this just another lame attempt to name drop??? How do you say the same exact thing to one another? Wouldn't one of you say it and the other just agree??
if you can't play you might be bragging about something that is true in your mind but not my world!
So now you're telling me Dennis Searing also doesn't know that Hit is Subjective.
Hits a ton Monster player statements should be reserved for people that have run at least 10 racks of straight or 9 ball!
That would meen that nobody other then pro players know if a cue hits good, the list of players who can run 10 straight racks of nine ball is very slim, it's only been done less then a handfull of times in a pro event. I think you are talking about less then 200 people world wide and some of them are pros who play with the worst hitting cues in the world (think Earl & Archer)
Just my thoughts! And if you do play that good then I apologise. But I don't think so!
Nick
LOL!!! You got that one right, Mark.MarknTorrance said:Not only does Jimbo have quite a collection he is one hell of a fishermen.
MarknTorrance
My logic is simple you needed to read on. If you don't play good enough to know a great cue when you have it in your hands how can you say hits a ton or great player? Wow I drew the ball 9 feet! No wow I ran a rack once was it 3 ball or nineball! No! Holy molie I can't believe the way this thing controls the rock! Now you are talkin!Koop said:I think he's saying that all of them put together wouldn't hit as good as the $3500 Cochran?
First off, and I have no bone to pick with you Nick, but I highly doubt the $3500 Cochran would hit any better than, say, a Joss. Just reality. In fact, most customs I have played with don't play any better or worse than a high end production cue. Just comes to down to rewarding yourself with a one of a kind and supporting cuemakers that we care about IMO.
Second, why the need to spend $3500 on a playing cue? I guess if you can afford it, great, but I always considered cues in that range to be collectors, not necessarily players.
Again, I have no bone to pick but I guess I just don't understand your logic.
Regards,
Koop
When you can play hit is objective because you know exactly what you are doing! Nothing subjective about it.JimBo said:I'm glad you don't feel I play good, you are a complete moron if you feel only people who can run 10 racks in a row are good players, and even dumber if you believe that only good players can tell if a cue feels good to them. But still the main question that we all need to hear your answer to.
Do you realize that *HIT* is *SUBJECTIVE*?????
It's not a hard question, take your time answering.
Jim
nick serdula said:My logic is simple you needed to read on. If you don't play good enough to know a great cue when you have it in your hands how can you say hits a ton or great player? Wow I drew the ball 9 feet! No wow I ran a rack once was it 3 ball or nineball! No! Holy molie I can't believe the way this thing controls the rock! Now you are talkin!
IMO Nick
Lots of cuemakers say the same thing. Also yes Mikes cues are not ment for players but the cues are awesome players!
Nick
nick serdula said:My logic is simple you needed to read on. If you don't play good enough to know a great cue when you have it in your hands how can you say hits a ton or great player?