John Barton
New member
Smorgass Bored said:Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water....
Doug
It's never safe here which is why most industry people and pros stay away or participate very little.
Smorgass Bored said:Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water....
Doug
BrooklynJay said:Mr. Taylor,
While you claim that Mr. Barton doesn't have the authority to make purchasing decisions for Sterling Games, which is a surprise to us all due to the claims made in Mr. Barton's posts, he is still an employee of your company and a representative of your firm on the various pool sites across the internet.
If this is "the face" of Sterling Games, since his behavior is known to you yet you allow it to continue, then you have lost at least one possible customer.
Sincerely,
BrooklynJay
So that makes it OK since Ernie already has enough $$$.John Barton said:Yes I am sure that Ernie Gutierrez is losing sleep and revenue over the Gina copy. And we have already had the discussion about the Sledgehammer/Fury and anyone can plainly see that it's a different cue.
And Sterling is NOT importing or selling any Justis copies.
sygfrid said:If there's no PATENT (especially internationally), LEGALLY, anyone can use it.
A Jack Justis design will always be a Jack Justis design even if you put another brand name on it (in marketing sense, there's already an "association" of a design to a specific brand) . HOWEVER, if Jack Justis wants to have an exclusive control over this design or every design that he makes, having it PATENTED is the only way to go...
But then again, PATENTS are quite territorial in nature: "The grant and enforcement of patents are governed by national laws, and also by international treaties, where those treaties have been given effect in national laws" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent
I hope this WAR will end soon. May both parties shake hands, forgive and forget. And may we, the other members, all be instruments of spreading PEACE as there is already much hatred going on around the world; simple acts of kindness help build a better world![]()
hejests said:This thread reminds me why the concept of a "trial by a jury of your peers" scares the crap out of me. Invariably, you'll always have ppl that couldn't care less about the truth or the facts. If they don't like you for whatever reason, they'll use any opportunity to try to roast you, whether the facts support it or not.
Peer: a person who is of equal standing with another in a group.ShootingArts said:Most people on trial should be scared almost to death if they look into a jury box and see a jury of their peers. The lawyers work on a simple theory, if the facts are on your side, trial by judge, no jury. If you need to baffle'm with BS, ask for a jury!
I have been involved in a few jury trials as a witness and expert witness. They are pretty entertaining when it isn't your head on the block.
Hu
PS I have been in the jury pool a handful of times over the years but somehow one side or the other never wants me on a jury. I don't think either side really does because I am likely to vote based on the facts as proven and based on what is right and wrong.
Patents protect one type of intellectual property: new and useful things and processes, or improvements on them. There are even specific design patents for ornamental designs. (International patents cannot be enforced in the US, only US patents can.)sygfrid said:If there's no PATENT (especially internationally), LEGALLY, anyone can use it.
Shawn Armstrong said:To John Barton:
So, then take back everything you said regarding the XB break cues being sold in Taiwan. There's no patent in Asia for the X-breaker, so fair is fair, right?
I'll take an apology for being called a piece of garbage during that thread too, please.
FAST_N_LOOSE said:YOU CAN NAME NAMES. I'M ALL RIGHT WITH IT. YOU CAN ALSO CALL ME ALL THE NAMES YOU WANT. IT JUST PROVES WHAT KIND OF PERSON YOU ARE. I DIDN'T LIE ABOUT YOU OR PROVIDE FALSE INFORMATION. I FORWARDED A PM TO SOMEONE THAT ASKED THE FORUM FOR INFORMATION. DID I ALTER THE PM? NO I DIDN'T, I DID NOTHING WRONG. WHAT I DID WASN'T DONE WITH MALICE. YOU SAID IT, I HADN'T DELETED THE PM, I SENT IT TO JACK. I STAND BEHIND THE THINGS I SAY AND DO. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO, IS THE SAME.
I DID RECEIVE THE FREE RAFFLE CUE. WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING? DO YOU WANT IT BACK? WOULD THAT MAKE YOU FEEL BETTER? IT'S NEVER HIT A BALL, AND LAYS IN MY HALLWAY.
... and in IMHO the SILLIEST way to combat the issue.classiccues said:I think what is getting lost is WHY do they bother importing them? Because there is money to be made. If everyone would not support importers of non-US goods, then there would be nothing to import. This is the simplest way to combat this issue.
JV
hejests said:... and in IMHO the SILLIEST way to combat the issue.
The US economy would survive as well with out imports as I would in a race to 100 with SVB... ie: It wouldn't survive.
classiccues said:If you think by boycotting a few thousand cases the US market would collapse, maybe it's better off you stay in Canada.![]()
Exactly what Scott said. Thanks.ScottW said:Obviously you consider yourself to be talking just about these knockoff cases as far as "imports" - but your post above simply stated "non-US goods" - implying you were talking about ALL imports of products into this country, knockoffs or not, cue cases or not. Hence, hejests' reply to you.
I agree.ScottW said:Obviously you consider yourself to be talking just about these knockoff cases as far as "imports" - but your post above simply stated "non-US goods" - implying you were talking about ALL imports of products into this country, knockoffs or not, cue cases or not. Hence, hejests' reply to you.