Justis Case Knockoff Design Thief Exposed

John has been the face of Sterling

John has indeed been the face of Sterling and spoken in their behalf in the past. It would be interesting to know if he has the authority to do so. If so, Sterling needs to stand behind him. If John doesn't speak for Sterling that needs to be made plain too. John is shaping many people's views of Sterling with his posts.

Hu


BrooklynJay said:
Mr. Taylor,

While you claim that Mr. Barton doesn't have the authority to make purchasing decisions for Sterling Games, which is a surprise to us all due to the claims made in Mr. Barton's posts, he is still an employee of your company and a representative of your firm on the various pool sites across the internet.

If this is "the face" of Sterling Games, since his behavior is known to you yet you allow it to continue, then you have lost at least one possible customer.

Sincerely,

BrooklynJay
 
This thread reminds me why the concept of a "trial by a jury of your peers" scares the crap out of me. Invariably, you'll always have ppl that couldn't care less about the truth or the facts. If they don't like you for whatever reason, they'll use any opportunity to try to roast you, whether the facts support it or not.
 
John Barton said:
Yes I am sure that Ernie Gutierrez is losing sleep and revenue over the Gina copy. And we have already had the discussion about the Sledgehammer/Fury and anyone can plainly see that it's a different cue.

And Sterling is NOT importing or selling any Justis copies.
So that makes it OK since Ernie already has enough $$$.

And the real question that comes to mind is, I wonder if you or the people at Sterling lose any sleep over your business practices?
 
sygfrid said:
If there's no PATENT (especially internationally), LEGALLY, anyone can use it.

A Jack Justis design will always be a Jack Justis design even if you put another brand name on it (in marketing sense, there's already an "association" of a design to a specific brand) . HOWEVER, if Jack Justis wants to have an exclusive control over this design or every design that he makes, having it PATENTED is the only way to go...

But then again, PATENTS are quite territorial in nature: "The grant and enforcement of patents are governed by national laws, and also by international treaties, where those treaties have been given effect in national laws" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent

I hope this WAR will end soon. May both parties shake hands, forgive and forget. And may we, the other members, all be instruments of spreading PEACE as there is already much hatred going on around the world; simple acts of kindness help build a better world :)

To John Barton:

So, then take back everything you said regarding the XB break cues being sold in Taiwan. There's no patent in Asia for the X-breaker, so fair is fair, right?

I'll take an apology for being called a piece of garbage during that thread too, please.
 
Last edited:
look up the meaning of "peer"

Most people on trial should be scared almost to death if they look into a jury box and see a jury of their peers. The lawyers work on a simple theory, if the facts are on your side, trial by judge, no jury. If you need to baffle'm with BS, ask for a jury!

I have been involved in a few jury trials as a witness and expert witness. They are pretty entertaining when it isn't your head on the block.

Hu

PS I have been in the jury pool a handful of times over the years but somehow one side or the other never wants me on a jury. I don't think either side really does because I am likely to vote based on the facts as proven and based on what is right and wrong.






hejests said:
This thread reminds me why the concept of a "trial by a jury of your peers" scares the crap out of me. Invariably, you'll always have ppl that couldn't care less about the truth or the facts. If they don't like you for whatever reason, they'll use any opportunity to try to roast you, whether the facts support it or not.
 
ShootingArts said:
Most people on trial should be scared almost to death if they look into a jury box and see a jury of their peers. The lawyers work on a simple theory, if the facts are on your side, trial by judge, no jury. If you need to baffle'm with BS, ask for a jury!

I have been involved in a few jury trials as a witness and expert witness. They are pretty entertaining when it isn't your head on the block.

Hu

PS I have been in the jury pool a handful of times over the years but somehow one side or the other never wants me on a jury. I don't think either side really does because I am likely to vote based on the facts as proven and based on what is right and wrong.
Peer: a person who is of equal standing with another in a group.

Like say posters on a web forum... we're all peers here. Some objective, some not so objective. Some on topic and some using this thread to relive/refight battles past.

What I find pretty funny is that after 14 pages of some thoughtful and some rediculous posts, no one has actually grilled whoever it was that has actually been importing the knockoffs. (... and still i have no idea who that is).
 
sygfrid said:
If there's no PATENT (especially internationally), LEGALLY, anyone can use it.
Patents protect one type of intellectual property: new and useful things and processes, or improvements on them. There are even specific design patents for ornamental designs. (International patents cannot be enforced in the US, only US patents can.)

But, there are other types of intellectual property that can be protected, for example trademarks and copyrights.

-td
 
Last edited:
Shawn Armstrong said:
To John Barton:

So, then take back everything you said regarding the XB break cues being sold in Taiwan. There's no patent in Asia for the X-breaker, so fair is fair, right?

I'll take an apology for being called a piece of garbage during that thread too, please.

How is it that you quote someone else and then ask me for an apology based on what they wrote?

I stand behind every word I wrote concerning the XB saga. I also stated quite plainly that it was ultimately richard's legal fight if he even had grounds in the first place.

I apologize for calling you a name Shawn. You are a human who deserves more respect.
 
Wait a minute...

FAST_N_LOOSE said:
YOU CAN NAME NAMES. I'M ALL RIGHT WITH IT. YOU CAN ALSO CALL ME ALL THE NAMES YOU WANT. IT JUST PROVES WHAT KIND OF PERSON YOU ARE. I DIDN'T LIE ABOUT YOU OR PROVIDE FALSE INFORMATION. I FORWARDED A PM TO SOMEONE THAT ASKED THE FORUM FOR INFORMATION. DID I ALTER THE PM? NO I DIDN'T, I DID NOTHING WRONG. WHAT I DID WASN'T DONE WITH MALICE. YOU SAID IT, I HADN'T DELETED THE PM, I SENT IT TO JACK. I STAND BEHIND THE THINGS I SAY AND DO. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO, IS THE SAME.

I DID RECEIVE THE FREE RAFFLE CUE. WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING? DO YOU WANT IT BACK? WOULD THAT MAKE YOU FEEL BETTER? IT'S NEVER HIT A BALL, AND LAYS IN MY HALLWAY.


...you solicit someone trying to find a knock-off case, share a PRIVATE message with someone other than the two parties involved and then claim that you've done NOTHING wrong?!?

You're in a BIG way responsible for all of this mess for sharing a correspondence that is not supposed to be shared. And, YOU wanted to buy a knock-off case!?! And then Mr. Justis uses your PM to him to really get the ball rolling.

Am I the only one who sees a little irony in all of this?

MM...BTW who is that chick in your avatar? She is HOT;)
 
I think what is getting lost is WHY do they bother importing them? Because there is money to be made. If everyone would not support importers of non-US goods, then there would be nothing to import. This is the simplest way to combat this issue.

JV
 
classiccues said:
I think what is getting lost is WHY do they bother importing them? Because there is money to be made. If everyone would not support importers of non-US goods, then there would be nothing to import. This is the simplest way to combat this issue.

JV
... and in IMHO the SILLIEST way to combat the issue.

The US economy would survive as well with out imports as I would in a race to 100 with SVB... ie: It wouldn't survive.
 
I would just like to apologise for stating in my earlier post that John Barton comes across as an egocentric person, I do not know him and subsequently do not have the right to include something like that in my post.

I apologise to you Mr Barton.
 
hejests said:
... and in IMHO the SILLIEST way to combat the issue.

The US economy would survive as well with out imports as I would in a race to 100 with SVB... ie: It wouldn't survive.

If you think by boycotting a few thousand cases the US market would collapse, maybe it's better off you stay in Canada. :D

JV
 
classiccues said:
If you think by boycotting a few thousand cases the US market would collapse, maybe it's better off you stay in Canada. :D

Obviously you consider yourself to be talking just about these knockoff cases as far as "imports" - but your post above simply stated "non-US goods" - implying you were talking about ALL imports of products into this country, knockoffs or not, cue cases or not. Hence, hejests' reply to you.
 
ScottW said:
Obviously you consider yourself to be talking just about these knockoff cases as far as "imports" - but your post above simply stated "non-US goods" - implying you were talking about ALL imports of products into this country, knockoffs or not, cue cases or not. Hence, hejests' reply to you.
Exactly what Scott said. Thanks.
 
Somebody send me a free case, my old one is falling apart.:D
 

Attachments

  • flowerscasesm.jpg
    flowerscasesm.jpg
    12.7 KB · Views: 234
ScottW said:
Obviously you consider yourself to be talking just about these knockoff cases as far as "imports" - but your post above simply stated "non-US goods" - implying you were talking about ALL imports of products into this country, knockoffs or not, cue cases or not. Hence, hejests' reply to you.
I agree.

Besides, didn't the US already try this? I think we abandoned isolationism in the 1940's. The global marketplace is firmly in place and we couldn't get by without out it. Where would Starbucks get my coffee beans without imports...

:)

-td
 
Well ...

There was only one 'original' idea, and noone on earth had it.

Think Whitten is mad about all the 'other' cases now that are spring loaded.

Was a 'Toyota' originally a 'knock-off'? Was 'Seiko' a knock-off of some Swiss watch? (Seikos sold for $20 American on most street corners in Japan during the Vietnam war)

What happens is that yes, people take ideas from other people, they make a similair product only cheaper to get their foot in the door. They improve their quality over time and technical knowledge, and the quality becomes better, and finally it rivals the original and becomes a direct competitor with the original. All you have to do is look at the Auto Industry and Imports to recognize that.

My mom drives a 2004 Hyundai Sonata, my brother a Lexus,and my brother says Mom's car rivals his in quality. The Sonata sold for $18,000, the Lexus for $46,000. Now, the ones going thru the motions is Kia and Suzuki to get up to snuff on market share.

This process has held true for decades, and will continue in all industries, especially with all the 'outsourcing' being done by our country. These so-called foreign country plants will someday go independent, make and assemble the whole product, and be a direct competitor with the original American product. Since we are outsourcing the 'engine' of the product (which has the most technical knowledge) and just do 'final assembly', what will happen to us after these plants go 'Independent', and we no longer are equipped to produce the 'engine' of the product any longer.
 
i have to say that i agree with Snapshot on this one... (rep to you i might add), i dont see whats wrong with a little competition in every market, but thats everyone's own oppinion... this is how i look at it, i have wanted a nice "Justis" style case for my cues for some time now, but i cant afford to drop 1000, for it, so basically what you guys are saying is that im just SOL because i dont have the extra 1000? im glad that someone is making them cheaper because thats the only way i will ever be able to afford one.

of course i will probably fry for saying this, but oh well.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top