Good questions here. No doubt, it's all about one's perspective. At tmes, the WPA in particular has achieved only marginal results, but of late, they seem to have had some measure of success.
The WPA announced within the past week a 26 event calendar for the upcoming year. My initial reaction is to applaud their efforts. After all, for them to have an event every two weeks on average means that for the player willing to compete internationally, there will be a very full slate of events and a whole lot of earnings opportunities.... and that's on top of what they can earn in tournaments in their own or nearby countries.
One of the core questions that needs to be considered, and which has, at times, been debated right here on AZB, is whether the growth of pool internationally is important to American pool. After all, to nobody's surprise, nearly all of the 26 WPA events will be in either Asia or the Middle East.
I come from the school of thought that worldwide growth of the game means more money in the profession called pro pool and that this should be a good thing for all who play pro pool.
Hence, my view is that the WPA has something to show of late for its efforts. The BCA however, is much harder to make a case for, and many argue that, as a trade organization, it should not remain the American delegate to the WPA, but that's a debate for another day.
I could understand why some might feel that, because America has failed to provide a pro tour or some other vehicle or means by which American players could participate much more often on the internaitonal tournament scene, the growth of pool on the international scene is of only marginal importance. I just don't happen to agree with those who feel this way.
Thanks once again for replying. I think that in some ways I do agree with you that the WPA is as of late doing a better job. The fact that there are going to be 26 tournaments this year worldwide does speak to that, even though as your post said most of the tournaments are in Asia or the Middle East. Still as you pointed out the more tournaments the more chances to make money and one every two weeks is I have to say way better than what the WPA used to do. So maybe they are getting better at what they do, I hope so.
Also I think that if you're a professional player you have to be good enough to make money on the world stage, of coarse you have to be in it to win it. Having said that I also understand that the travel expenses will be more since basically all the tournaments are outside of the US. There also seems to be less player sponsorship in the US as opposed to other countries. Not to mention that other countries help their players financially and of coarse the standard fact that in pro pool the prize funds just aren't that big. These are big challenges for the U.S. players!
Then there's the fact that the money that is earned just doesn't go as far here in the U.S. as some other countries. All this screams to the fact that the governing bodies in the U.S. need to find a way to help Pro Players in this country. All one has to do is take a look at the amount of (or should I say the lack of) US players in the International events. Actually I find this disheartening if you don't look closely you wouldn't know the U.S. is even represented, that's sad!
So even though the WPA has come a long way. I think for the United States pro players there's still a long way to go.
It's good to be able to converse when it's kept more civil unfortunately lots of times on the forums it doesn't seem to work that way thanks. I guess I've gone a little off the topic sorry if that bothers anybody I didn't mean to.
Last edited: