Honestly, for most skilled player in the world, I like Wu over Ko. He was doing a lot more technical stuff than Ko with position and defense and was just as strong pocketing balls and mentally.
Let's say two different players each win a tournament of the exact same format against the exact same field. For the sake of argument, we'll say the wins are ten days apart. One tournament has the word "World" in its name. The other doesn't. Is the player who won the "World" tournament the better player because of the name of the event?
You're really grasping here, but if I must address your completely unrealistic scenario.
The answer to your question is, "no."
However, in the real world, the "World" tournament will always have the strongest fields. Why? Because any Joe Schmo can't buy in and try his luck.
So if a player wins not one, but two "World" tournaments in the same year. Yeah, I think it's acceptable for people to say he's the best on earth. It doesn't mean he's the best ever, or that he'll even be the best next year.
Let's say two different players each win a tournament of the exact same format against the exact same field. For the sake of argument, we'll say the wins are ten days apart. One tournament has the word "World" in its name. The other doesn't. Is the player who won the "World" tournament the better player because of the name of the event?
That not what I meant. What I meant was whenever someone won a world championship or an International tournament suddenly people are quick in saying " He is the best player in the world".
That not what I meant. What I meant was whenever someone won a world championship or an International tournament suddenly people are quick in saying " He is the best player in the world".
In my opinion the US open does not have just as strong as a field as the Worlds. Probably half the field of the open is dead money. Many good regional players, but in actuality probably only 20 killers and of those only perhaps 5 that are odds on favorite.
The US open is also a true double elimination tourney, which means you have another chance if you lose once. The worlds with the round robin seeding and then single slim after that means you have to play perfect every match. Lose once and you are out.
Those things IMHO make the word championship a harder tourney to win.
Not really. Ko and Wu both played an incredible match in the semis. They put on a better performance than any match in recent memory.