They don't look like Whitten's to me. But I tend to have a discerning eye for cases since I do leatherwork and have built a few cases.
As far as I can see Mr Baxter is simply selling some high value cases. A Whitten case is a whole different animal.
Does a mid-eighties Firebird look like a Ferrari? The designers literally made it fit a Ferrari silhouette, and they admitted to it publicly. The exact thing was done with the Honda Rebel in the 1980's using a Harley silhouette, that was revealed publicly in a legal dispute. Do you really think they are knock-offs? Really?
Upgrade the materials a few notches, make the design a lot closer, and charge a few hundred more and I'll call it a knock-off.
.
.
If a product is modeled closely after a predecessor then it's a knockoff. That is the literal definition of a knockoff. It can be just a few key elements of the design or a virtual clone. The fact that the Harley/Honda similarity had to be admitted in court is exactly my point.
My personal feelings about knockoffs are ambivalent these days. I can't really tell another person that they aren't allowed to earn money by knocking off my designs if I wouldn't tell a farmer he isn't allowed to copy a successful way to farm.
What I want to see, and maybe this is just wishful thinking, is at least in our small industry that credit is given where it should be. Let's me clear, making and selling knockoffs is legal in the USA. And the ethics of it are permanently in a grey area as well. Some people see it as black and white and at one time I did too. But it's not and there are actually good arguments that copying is good for the economy and spawns innovation as a wider variety of derivative products are created.
All I want is for people to say, my inspiration came from..... or these cases are clearly inspired by....... coupled with FACTUAL statements of quality, durability, warranty and so on.
Back when I owned Instroke we were plagued by knockoffs. Not only did not acknowledge us for the design inspiration the distributors and sellers went so far as to plagiarize our advertising copy pretty much verbatim and thus claim that their quality was as good as ours. Which was not true.
Anyway, this is all academic. I know that if I were to start selling Whitten knockoffs then the uproar would be tremendous and the copy-police on the forum would be all over it. Or if someone came on here with a new screen name like Heng Chong Case Factory and showed off Whitten knockoffs they would be tarred and feathered. So we live in a world of double standards where some people get free passes and others get attacked. I don't really care anymore except that I think anyone who wants to sell knockoffs should at least be gracious enough to acknowledge the original designer. Especially if the knockoffs are virtual clones and not just partially similar.