Neil,
The OP specifically stated his room does not allow the use of traditional "short" jump cues. Your statement is correct for BCAPL, ACS, VNEA etc. league play. This is a special circumstance that parallels the Joss Tour and others.
Lyn
In Efren's first 15 years as a "pro" in the USA jump cues were not very popular. Most pros did not own or use them during that time. .
... BCA rules are
Player may bring a maximum of 3 cue sticks to a match.
Width of tip: 9 mm minimum / 14 mm maximum ...
Not correct. Even once jump cues had become extremely popular, Efren still didn't use one. He was among the last of the top players to start using one, and I recall just how shocking it was when he first starting using the jump cue. I'm not relating what I've read, but what I've seen. I've followed the tournament trail seriously since the mid-1970's.
I agree that this is not a kicking vs jumping thread, but I reacted to a post in which somebody claimed that it was the poor safety players who tend to embrace the jump shot the least, and I was correct in offering Efren as a counterexample.
I don't think that jumping has ruined the game, but I think it has made it less elegant. For me personally, there is nothing more beatuiful than a well-executed kick, but I've never felt the same about the jump shot. Personal preference, that's all.
Not correct. Even once jump cues had become extremely popular, Efren still didn't use one. He was among the last of the top players to start using one, and I recall just how shocking it was when he first starting using the jump cue. I'm not relating what I've read, but what I've seen. I've followed the tournament trail seriously since the mid-1970's.
I agree that this is not a kicking vs jumping thread, but I reacted to a post in which somebody claimed that it was the poor safety players who tend to embrace the jump shot the least, and I was correct in offering Efren as a counterexample.
I don't think that jumping has ruined the game, but I think it has made it less elegant. For me personally, there is nothing more beatuiful than a well-executed kick, but I've never felt the same about the jump shot. Personal preference, that's all.
Stop framing it as a kicking vs. jumping argument. It's not.
Not correct. Even once jump cues had become extremely popular, Efren still didn't use one. He was among the last of the top players to start using one, and I recall just how shocking it was when he first starting using the jump cue. I'm not relating what I've read, but what I've seen. I've followed the tournament trail seriously since the mid-1970's.
I agree that this is not a kicking vs jumping thread, but I reacted to a post in which somebody claimed that it was the poor safety players who tend to embrace the jump shot the least, and I was correct in offering Efren as a counterexample.
I don't think that jumping has ruined the game, but I think it has made it less elegant. For me personally, there is nothing more beatuiful than a well-executed kick, but I've never felt the same about the jump shot. Personal preference, that's all.
Well said Mr. Barton. That's a flawed argument they use.
There's no reasoning with these anti-jump bigots and whiners. If they possessed any intelligence, they'd recognize that the jump shot and the jump cue actually enhances and progresses the kicking game, as well as advances the safety game.
They claim to love kicks so much and the beauty of the kicking game, they should be the first ones to promote jump cues. Since jump cues often deny the opponent the ability of playing a C or D level player safety where they just bump a ball or roll the cue ball and rely on just a simple obstacle ball. They force playing tighter safeties. And if the safety is tight enough, a jump shot often isn't an option. Thus, resulting in some of the most difficult and advanced kicks the game has seen.
The anti-jump whiners want to see their opponents kick. Great! Fantastic! MAKE THEM KICK BY PLAYING A GOOD SAFE. NOT A LAME ROLL SAFE.
What this is really about, is these anti-jump whiners wanting their opponents to have to kick the weakest and laziest (easiest) safes they play against them. They just want to roll and bump, with little thought or effort (or skill) and stick their opponents badly. All because a jump isn't allowed.
How is this advancing the kicking game? How does this respect the kicking game? How does this help the safety game?
Pool is stupid when anyone can just get behind an obstacle ball and expect a high percentage safety or outcome. Players should have to also work for a safety. Otherwise, it becomes nonsense not much better than bangers banging away on a table.
Remember the elements of a good safety - hiding the CB, hiding the object ball, distance, taking away the escape route (rails), taking away options on the CB (sticking it to rail, taking away draw etcetera)....and other elements.
Being able to jump is an essential and critical part of the game. It serves as a much needed DETERRENT to weak, lazy and sloppy play. It elevates pool, it doesn't make pool easier nor does it dumb it down, contrary to what the anti-jump whiners claim.
Going up against a strong player, who possesses strong jump skills (which would be a high percentage chance of making the ball, and a high percentage chance of getting shape on the next ball)...you will think twice about just walking up to the table, and bumping some lazy safe. You won't do that again after they burn you with a couple good jump shots. Instead, next time, be a real player, get up there and execute a quality skill shot - and make that safety the best safety you can play.
There's nothing more satisfying than a safety that is so good, there's no jump shot, and the kick is some ridiculously difficult low percentage trick shot. There's no pride in just cinching behind an easy obstacle.
The anti-jump whiners want the RULES to make their opponent kick, rather than using their own skills to make & force their opponent to kick.
It takes more talent to kick than to jump!! Jumping does not belong in the game!!
It takes more talent to kick than to jump!! Jumping does not belong in the game!!
In Efren's first 15 years as a "pro" in the USA jump cues were not very popular. Most pros did not own or use them during that time. Fong Pang Chao bought his first one from me at one of the shows in Las Vegas and that same year won the Challenge of Champions against Bustamante with a long jump shot to cut a mid-table 7 ball in. Allen Hopkins rightly commented that Bustamante had played the wrong safety and diagrammed another one that would have cut off the jump shot.
Efren now uses a jump cue.
Speaking of Allen Hopkins he didn't use one for a long time either despite being near Pat Fleming who kind of pioneered them. But many years ago Allen stopped by my booth and wanted to try one. His first shot he jumped the cue ball off the table. After 3 seconds of instruction from me which consisted of saying "half that power Allen" he locked into what he needed and proceeded to make some great controlled shots. He bought a cue.
Room owners are all wrong when they ban jump cues. The cues are legal in the world rules so instead of banning them how about teaching the "amateurs" the proper way to use them and when to use them. Encourage learning and skill-building.
People talk about the decline of pool well THIS is one reason why. All this fracturing is ridiculous.
I think it was Bob Jewett who recommended having a jump shot practice day when the pool room is going to recover the tables.
Imagine for a moment what sorts of FUN you could have in a pool room where you invite your customers to GO CRAZY learning to jump and masse?
I can guarantee that the end result would be customers and players that have more skills AND more respect for the equipment after they spent a day or so tearing it up on purpose.
Those newly skilled customers would then be the ones who guide all the others who didn't get the benefit of the training day.
Bring in someone who knows how to jump and someone who knows everything about masse' shots. What fun it would be to learn from them in a setting where no one was afraid to kill the cloth.
BUT no one thinks this way do they? Just fracture pool as much as possible and be DIFFERENT than the rest of the world and then wonder why the rest of the world is better at the game.
In China and Taiwan they have house jump cues that any one can use.
In America, the land of prohibition, people have to make up hybrid workarounds to get around biased bans.
I always figured room owners should give jumper-wannabes a Jump Test on a crap table and then issue a "license-to-jump" to those who passed the test. Everyone else would be prohibited from jumping until passing the test.
Jeff Livingston
I would add a license to masse' as well.
Actually if room owners were MORE engaged with how their customers played then there wouldn't be any need for this type of debate.
I knew one guy who had a pretty good business because he made it his business to know how his customers played and suggested things for them to do to get better. As a result his tables were rented more by people putting in earnest practice.
Maybe a license to gamble, as well?
Jeff Livingston
.......In America, the land of prohibition, ...........
Oh boy, here we go again.
..........I say this ten thousand times on here but if you have the best jumper in the world with a full cue I will give him a full cue off the rack, not doctored in any way that will make him look like a fool when he tries to jump a ball.............
QUOTE]
When the house says u can`t use jump cue and u have to use a Full length cue only, do u know how to beat/cheat the house rules ?
Answer: Go to the wall racks and pick a cue without any Tip at all. House cue without a tip can jump the cue ball as good as any of those fancy jump cues .
Roadies, Sorry to let the secret out.![]()