Not sure what you mean. The balance point moves back on the cue no matter where you grip it.Correct, but depending on where you grip on the new cue it might change one way or the other. I showed the math in a later post.
pj
chgo
Not sure what you mean. The balance point moves back on the cue no matter where you grip it.Correct, but depending on where you grip on the new cue it might change one way or the other. I showed the math in a later post.
Not sure what you mean. The balance point moves back on the cue no matter where you grip it.
pj
chgo
Oh, I get you now. Thanks for the patient replies to my nitpicking.Correct. But the distance from you grip hand to that balance point (the center of mass of the cue) might change if I move my hand back to take advantage of the extra space. It's that difference from the center of mass that you feel on your fingers (or not, I don't think a few inches matters).
In my example above, if I grip my hand at the very end of the cue in both examples, my hand is 18 in from the balance point pre extension and 22 inches from that balance point when using the extension.
Read the rest of my post and try to comprehend what I was saying.Cause they have longer arms than you.
Yes, and it also has to do with a person's fundamentals. If a tall player bends his bridge arm, then he can get away with using a shorter cue. I'm 6' 7" and use a 65" cue. I'd rather get a cue that fits my arm span than bend my bridge arm more on every shot.Cause they have longer arms than you.
Exactly what I need. The butt of my sneaky Pete cue is hollowed out about 18" deep. So would the void need to be completely filled, then tapped for the extension bolt? Not really worried about the extra couple ounces, but as little as possible and still achieve the desired outcome.With so many trying longer cues now days, I decided to make a short extension for one of my Schons to try. While the piece of Birdseye I had laying around in the shop wasn't near as nice as what was on my cue, I decided it would be OK for an experiment.Was a fun little project and added 2 1/2" to the cue. Any more and it wouldn't fit my case. As to added weight, wasn't much as I hollowed it out as much as I could, and put a aluminum weight screw in my cue in place of the steel one it had. Added about 1/2 oz when all said and done. Weight with extension, 19 3/4 oz, cue length with a 30" shaft 61 1/2". Used it at home for about 3 weeks now and took it to league this week and had a couple shots where I was bumping a table with the bumper a couple of times so I took it off when getting home. The cue balance remained good with how I lightened it up. Really liked it, but if it's going to interfere when out shooting, I'll leave it off for now. Total cost to make about 60 cents for a longer bumper bolt. Also purchased a couple of extensions from Rick Roper about the same time and ended up using his bumper on the wood extension while I had it on. So the other pic is of the Rick roper extensions.
what taper?I cant wait for Mike Gulyassy to finish making me the new "Earl" shaft for this 60" cue of his. 14mm with a black phenolic ferrule.
View attachment 629933
View attachment 629934
It will be a long pro taper...similar to Earl's.what taper?
Ok. Is this new for, to use a 14mm playing shaft?It will be a long pro taper...similar to Earl's.
I have used 14mm shafts since I was a teenager and used to have all my cues made with 14mm shafts.Ok. Is this new for, to use a 14mm playing shaft?
14mm wowI cant wait for Mike Gulyassy to finish making me the new "Earl" shaft for this 60" cue of his. 14mm with a black phenolic ferrule.
View attachment 629933
View attachment 629934
Rick Roper carbon Extension……Looking it upEddie, here is some pics of what I experimented with. I have since taken it off as it interfered at times with the seating in our pool league. I do prefer it on though. I now use Rick roper carbon extensions with his quick detach replacement bumper. They are really nice and incredibly light, and can be made in any length desired. May take a couple of posts for all pics.
It feels good at the start and it has some benefits like you feel the hand is going straight + you could draw easier with less power. However, in the grand scheme of things, I think the negative outweighs the positive. I feel that they really believe that this longer cue is benefiting them and it's true they believe this which has some psychological effect added with the advantage that I've told previously which is true BUT in reality, they would do better in the normal length cue.I’m wondering how they ( Shane , Jayson and Earl ) have cues 64-66” that are not over 20oz ? If the cues are over 20oz , how heavy and how they adjusted, like them and anyone else here tried it ? Thanks![]()