We used to play this way back when. We called it "call shape." I think the local record was 17, which means he got through a break shot.
We used to play this way back when. We called it "call shape." I think the local record was 17, which means he got through a break shot.
I've done it before in practice and it certainly does make you concentrate on what you should be concentrating on.
We would usually have to call the ball we were shooting and the next two. You could always change your mind when you got up to the next shot.
I would like to see a match or a tournament playing 14.1 where you have to call the OB and pocket and at the same time call the next ball you are going to shoot. No need to call the pocket on the second ball until before you shoot it. I don’t think even the top players would run 100 very often if ever. Johnnyt
This confuses me a little. I kind of thought it's what everyone already does. I don't call anything out loud, but in my head I know what and where I'm going to shoot next...in fact, I do so for several balls ahead. Things don't always go the way I planned to work the pattern, but I try, and then adjust when needed--and rethink the planned run. The same kind of thing I did when I played competitive chess. Similarly, in 9-ball, I visualize the whole run, working shape on each ball backwards from the 9.
To make it really hard, try playing with pool balls on a snooker table.
This confuses me a little. I kind of thought it's what everyone already does. I don't call anything out loud, but in my head I know what and where I'm going to shoot next...in fact, I do so for several balls ahead. Things don't always go the way I planned to work the pattern, but I try, and then adjust when needed...
This confuses me a little. I kind of thought it's what everyone already does. I don't call anything out loud, but in my head I know what and where I'm going to shoot next...in fact, I do so for several balls ahead.
I think for most people, ball-in-hand for any miss would be appropriate. The game is hard enough without adding safes. For learning purposes, ball in hand will give you more opportunity to plan break-and-shape patterns. The first ball of each run should not be counted, I think, if you start with ball in hand.would you be allowed to safe if you got bad shape on the next ball? Or are you forced to take a flyer at it?
I think I'm harder on myself for missing shape than I am for missing a ball.
When I get really serious about playing, one of the exercises I use is to throw three balls on the table at random. Get ball in hand, and call each of the balls before I shoot the first one. If I miss a ball, I have to start over with a new set of three. Sometimes, if I get too far out of shape, it means shooting a wild shot to try to get the ball to the pocket I called in advance. If I run three balls, three times, I move to four balls, four times, and so on.
Never gotten to nine balls, nine times. *grin*
Try it--you'll hate it.
Whatever game I play, I always try to think about shape first....
From what I have heard, Michael Eufemia was able to take a full rack of 14.1 with the break shot set up, and then tell you what ball was going into what pocket and the order they would go in before he would take the break shot.. He would have you write it down, and then do it. He couldn't do it every time, of course. But he could do it often enough to blow your mind.
Now, if that story really is true, try and wrap your head around doing that!