I started to pitch this chalk on this Forum months back. It is better than V10, if not for its shape alone.From my experience, the V10 needs more attention when applying it to the tip. Especially on the sides of the tip. I need to scuff the tip more often with the Blue V10.
I also have the Pagulayan chalk in green, made by Taum but in my opinion it has a different formula to it, it’s a bit softer and applies easier and grabs the sides of the tip better.
Maybe it’s Blue vs. Green, I could order a green V10 and a blue Pagulayan and test but why bother?
The green Pagulayan works great for me and I prefer the cube shape so it’s a win win for me.
How did the pro's overcome the miscues with v10 chalk? Did they adjust their miscue limit on the CB, and stop hitting as far out on the CB edges as they use to?
People say it is a stroke issue but I strongly believe the the grittier chalks let you hit, or give you a larger miscue limit.
Does Taom V10 and other soft chalks give you the same spin as grittier/harder chalks without having to hit as far outside on the cueball?
A key piece of missing information is how many times in the 200 balls did you chalk your cue’s tip?One miscue today.
200 balls pocketed in an hour 1.5
Warm in the pool hall so it gave me the cake layers. Also an old piece of v10 that was given to me.
I forget. I wasn't really testing the chalk because I would be thinking about it too much.A key piece of missing information is how many times in the 200 balls did you chalk your cue’s tip?
Next would be what do you believe was the reason for your miscue? Then before you miscued, how
many shots did you take without chalking including the miscue’s stroke attempt? Were you stroking
the cue ball with English, what type and how many tips of aEnglish were you applying? There are a
variety of reasons why you may miscue. Even one in 200 attempts is too many? You are not supposed
to miscue. I attribute it to carelessness more than anything else, at least for me. There’s no reason to do it.
If you have an awkward bridge or very difficult shot, respect its difficulty, be careful & try to avoid any English.
Looking back at how the miscue occurred, would you venture a guess whether it was associated with not having sufficient chalk residue on your tip, was your bridge position comfortable, just a momentary take your eyes off the OB or CB or maybe just a brain fart that pops up every now and then. Sort of I don’t know what I was thinking when I tried that shot? I usually don’t associate or attribute my own miscues, or pretty much anyone else’s, to chalking vs. just being careless or clumsy.I forget. I wasn't really testing the chalk because I would be thinking about it too much.
I was in the mood to play since there were a lot of tournaments being streamed this weekend and I was motivated to play.
So you are saying an expensive cue will make me a better player?? There was one place where I shot league and I often used one particular house cue because I liked the hit so much, I'm sure it was clo9se to $1,000 cheaper than my cue.I disagree or else we all be shooting with house cues.
A lot of guys have cues here that are worth more than all the house cues put together at any given pool hall. Some have enough to buy a car or put a down payment on a home.
While its true but its not something we should say if you have what I mentioned above.
Equipment does make you shoot better that is a pretty much known fact. Again, or we would be shooting with something off the wall.So you are saying an expensive cue will make me a better player?? There was one place where I shot league and I often used one particular house cue because I liked the hit so much, I'm sure it was clo9se to $1,000 cheaper than my cue.
The only difference between a good house cue and a custom $5k cue besides the tip is one is prettier than the other, one does not make you shoot better though, if they did the pro's would all have $10k cues or whatever that cut off point is between a better shooting cue and a not so good shooting cue.
I figured out that the time I am most likely to miscue is on a slow speed draw shot, I think I decrease my cue speed at contact and it causes me to lift the rear of my cue, once I figured out when it was happening most I was able to eliminate my miscues. Same with flying the cue ball off of the table. Most likely time for it to happen was on a cut break, I was lifting the rear of my cue, QB was in the air when it hit the rack causing the cue ball to fly off table.Looking back at how the miscue occurred, would you venture a guess whether it was associated with not having sufficient chalk residue on your tip, was your bridge position comfortable, just a momentary take your eyes off the OB or CB or maybe just a brain fart that pops up every now and then. Sort of I don’t what I was thinking when I tried that shot? I usually don’t associate or attribute my own miscues, or pretty much anyone else’s, to chalking versus just being careless or clumsy.
I aim super low on draw shots so my margin of error is bigger. The chalk could be the deciding factor of whether I 'line drive' the cue ball at my opponent or not.I figured out that the time I am most likely to miscue is on a slow speed draw shot, I think I decrease my cue speed at contact and it causes me to lift the rear of my cue, once I figured out when it was happening most I was able to eliminate my miscues. Same with flying the cue ball off of the table. Most likely time for it to happen was on a cut break, I was lifting the rear of my cue, QB was in the air when it hit the rack causing the cue ball to fly off table.
I can't quantify if I get less miss-cues with V10.From my experience, all chalks, at least the reliable ones perform the same in terms of spin, the difference lies in at least my case is how dirty my hands gets after prolonged use. The Taom chalks are the cleanest from my experience (Master, Silver Cup and Blue Diamond).