I suppose you're right as far as you go, but become aware that the laws of this country make fraud a crime punishable by fine or prison time and those laws do apply here and perhaps they should be on trial for false advertising, fraud and violation of an implied contract.
In one clear sentence, please describe the rule change that you say was so clearly spelled out.
Mr. McConnell,
Do you love to shoot pool? Does it make you happy?
To McConnell:
Well McConnell since you feel wrongly convicted of an offense you might not have committed, what do you think should have happened, after your suggestion was made and discussed among the league players you spoke with?
Almost sounds like a loaded question but here goes. First, I should never have been de-sanctioned, and the league operator should have held a meeting to announce the results and a rule change back to the BCAPL 9-Ball Rulers. Second, if your talking about the petition 54.17% were in favor as previousley stated. If you speaking of the de-sanctioning that same 54.17% think that I got a raw deal and are going to finish up this season and forget this league next year.
this week's award goes to...... C. Carl mcconnell! Congrats!
ROFL......every time I think of Bill Stock, I picture that old Disney cartoon about Robin Hood. He dresses up for an archery competition wearing stilts and a goofy long beak.
I start chuckling when I picture it. Thanks for the laugh...
Back to the OP, guess you will be joining APA, VNEA orsome other league?
almost sounds like a loaded question but here goes. First, i should never have been de-sanctioned, and the league operator should have held a meeting to announce the results and a rule change back to the bcapl 9-ball rules. Second, if your talking about the petition 54.17% were in favor as previousley stated. if your speaking of the de-sanctioning that same 54.17% think that i got a raw deal and are going to finish up this season and forget this league next year. So next year there probable will not be a league.
Almost sounds like a loaded question but here goes. First, I should never have been de-sanctioned, and the league operator should have held a meeting to announce the results and a rule change back to the BCAPL 9-Ball Rules. Second, if your talking about the petition 54.17% were in favor as previousley stated. If your speaking of the de-sanctioning that same 54.17% think that I got a raw deal and are going to finish up this season and forget this league next year. So next year there probable will not be a league.
For some reason that did not happen. But since you were able to convince a group of people for a change, sounds like you learned a new talent to apply in the future.
If I lost my league playing status, it would be tough to find players that are willing to agree to a specific set of rules to abide by.
It is great a situation like this did not turn you away from the billiard community, instead you pretty much opened right up to it.
The AZ mod is to thank for hosting the site for people to vent and support and discuss changes in league life and professional pool.
To McConnell:
Well McConnell since you feel wrongly convicted of an offense you might not have committed, what do you think should have happened, after your suggestion was made and discussed among the league players you spoke with?
I stand corrected. You did mention the call 9 ball in your original post.
I was more focused, as I was weeding through all the gibberish and poor grammar, to find the main point of your post. I guess that was it, huh?
So, you accuse Mr. Griffin and Stock of being sneaky, underhanded, unprofessional, and engaging in illegal activity involving more turpitude or conduct dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation?
All over a rule to call the 9 ball or not? Please find another activity.
I don't know the specifics of the OP's situation, other than wanting to make a change to the published rules of the BCAPL, so no comments about the personality/personal issues. I believe that one of the basic concepts of the BCAPL is to create a level playing field for every player, so that the same rules apply to every match every week, every tournament, all the way through to the nationals. It's really a way to protect players from the "sorry, but that's the way we do it here" response to a claimed violation of a local variation that's not part of the published rules. BCAPL has worked long and hard to create those standardized rules, so that the vitriolic disputes about rules that we see raised on AZB from time to time are not a regular part of their events. [run a search on "rules dispute" and have fun reading.] Nice to know that everyone playing their way into the nationals has done so with the exact same rules all year. And better to see that there's a national effort by BCAPL to enforce their vision of how to make the player's ability the only variable in a match. Not there yet, but this is a great place to start. Sorry if you don't like special sauce on your Big Mac, but you'll get it the same way at every McDonald's in the world, and you'll play by the same rules in every single BCAPL event. I think that's what is behind this, and I think it's past time for standard published rules to be enforced to keep rules sharking out of the pool hall.