This hasn't been just a 'yay BCA/bcapl rules' thread. This has been a weird crazy rules thread.
There's a logic to rules- especially when there's a whole set of rules that work together. Rules make opportunities and take some away. They encourage a variety of skills. They make a game equally fair between both players.
Reread some of those crazy rules listed above along those lines: do the rules cited above serve a purpose? Do they work in harmony with the rest of the rules of the game, or do they just confuse? Do they encourage skill or do they encourage favoritism, fighting, or just luck?
They make a game equally fair between both players
EQUALLY FAIR? NOT JUST FAIR...BUT EQUALLY FAIR.
Sounds like, 'They're TOO good... so... we'll change the rules to make it MORE EQUALLY FAIR'. 'They shoot too good when the cue ball is up against the rail. So let's put a rule in where 'we' can move it off the rail ONE CUE BUTT WIDTH' ('But his butt is bigger than mine.') 'We don't care if that & that alone can effect the outcome of a game, we have to make the COMPETITION more EQUALLY FAIR."
So now if they can do it then I can do it, & I can now stop or draw the ball where I could not before. Has the NEW rule been EQUALY FAIR...to them? I'm just say'in! EQUALLY FAIR?
PS The above is an example of a very LOGICAL rule.
PSS The rules that were in place, for how long, I'm guessing now, say more than 300 years, They were not LOGICAL & they certainly were not EQUALLY FAIR.
Last edited: