Well I would have to know more about his skills and age ,, running a 100 is a big task to learn in 6 months ,, I would bet against it
1
I know his skills.
Well I would have to know more about his skills and age ,, running a 100 is a big task to learn in 6 months ,, I would bet against it
1
The world is full of +4s that are not good enough to get a card ,,,
You have to qualify ,, either in Q school or being the leading money winner on a couple of the mini tours ,,, so just going out and shooting sub par rounds and posting it on your PGA handicap card isn't worth a hill of beans ,,
1
btw...there is a convenient donations link on his website if anyone is so inclined.
So here is a hypothetical question. If you were given the freedom to select 20-30 youths (ages 4-6) per year, remove them from their homes, give them access to world class coaching and training, and allow them to completely dedicate their lives to the task of becoming world class athletes in a given Olympic discipline. How would you select the kids in order to maximize your chances of success?
Would you examine their physical characteristics?
Would you examine their parents and their physical characteristics?
Would you give them a battery of cognitive tests?
i.e. would you examine any inheritable, genetically influenced traits? or do you think a random selection of kids would yield the same chances for success?
I am not inclined. I admire what he is doing and I think the golf industry should be amply supportive of his quest.
Mmmmm, I see we are playing the "avoid the gambling" posts game again ! (mine)..Thats OK..It is wise of you
to change the subject, to something you know something about. (ie; 'Chinese ballet' and 'rocks in shoes')
It figures you are supportive of "The Dan Plan"..when everyone else knows he doesn't have a prayer !..I'm sorry John, but I'm beginning to think someone put a 'rock' in your brain, at birth ! :sorry:
SJD
PS..Are you SURE you are not related to CJ ? :embarrassed2:
View attachment 345622
You surely meant -3 to -6, didn't you !(I know you know more about golf, than CJ, or Barton !
)
I know all the guys you played golf with in Ft. Worth.....they all consider you a sucker and used to beat you out of your $30 every day......what a gambler you must have been.![]()
In case anyone was born too dumb to know already
http://www.natureworldnews.com/arti...ment-determining-intelligence-chimpanzees.htm
I have a serious question for you. Where is your personal limit on how good you can become at pool? Let me simplify this by narrowing it down to one shot. Set up a shot that you cannot execute and ask yourself just how good you can possibly get at this shot. What is your genetic program set to? Determine that, reach that level, and then ask yourself if it is really impossible for you to get any better. Barring the laws of physics, I have never seen anyone reach a limit short of perfection where more knowledge and more practice could not push them beyond.
Sorry not going there. Your question has bad premises to begin with.
I will just say whatever my improvement rate would be, it would be 5% of what someone with "ingrained pool talent" would be. I already proved that by practicing/wasting at least 10 years 5-6 days a week anywhere from 1-7 hours and never got to be a mid level C Player. I saw people just starting the game and practicing waaaaaaaaaaay less than I, surpass me in 9 months or so-then be 2 balls better in the next 15 months after that.
The straight in shot that I practiced day after day for 8 years or so- I was no better at it the last day than the VERY FIRST DAY. Period.
Like i said i was a 2 over golfer at 16, virtually no white guy could beat me in a foot race- I high jumped to 5'11" in gym class in 9th grade with Zero misses (the bell rang) I had NO talent for pool-none.
Sorry not going there. Your question has bad premises to begin with.
I will just say whatever my improvement rate would be, it would be 5% of what someone with "ingrained pool talent" would be. I already proved that by practicing/wasting at least 10 years 5-6 days a week anywhere from 1-7 hours and never got to be a mid level C Player. I saw people just starting the game and practicing waaaaaaaaaaay less than I, surpass me in 9 months or so-then be 2 balls better in the next 15 months after that. I had a couple lessons which is 2 more than the new guys that beat me and i hung around with and got pointers and info from B-A+ players daily.
The straight in shot that I practiced day after day for 8 years or so- I was no better at it the last day than the VERY FIRST DAY. Period.
Like i said i was a 2 over golfer at 16, virtually no white guy could beat me in a foot race- I high jumped to 5'11" in gym class in 9th grade with Zero misses (the bell rang) I had NO talent for pool-none.
Wow, you just showed your cards didn't you - a "+5 Handicap" averages 5 under, not 5 over. I can't believe you're trying to pass yourself off as a good golfer.....that's ludicrous.
I know all the guys you played golf with in Ft. Worth.....they all consider you a sucker and used to beat you out of your $30 every day......what a gambler you must have been.![]()
Really? I don't care. I also don't care about a world full of +4s. I am neither right or wrong at this point. I have simply bet on Dan making the cut within a year of completing his 10k hours. If he doesn't then he doesn't and I have lost a c-note. You will know in about 4 more years I guess.
What I know for sure is that IF Dan makes his tour card you will find a way to knock it. And if he doesn't you will be saying I told you so.
For me, I admire a guy that's willing to chuck his career and do something like this. To go from ZERO GOLF to putting in 10k hours just to see if he can get to world class is pretty freaking cool. That's the type of world I like to live in and even if Dan doesn't make it to the pros he will have grown tremendously and there will be a lot of data to discuss.
He is right about that. It's all based on par. If I'm +7 and you are a -13 I need to give you 20 strokesI think you're wrong about the handicap thing..
A five handicap means that you average 5 over par.
Jaden <-----a 13 handicap...
I think you're wrong about the handicap thing..
A five handicap means that you average 5 over par.
Jaden <-----a 13 handicap...
He is right about that. It's all based on par. If I'm -7 and you are a -13 I need to give you 20 strokes
1
For 99.99% of the golfing world, handicaps are simply stated as: "I'm an 18 handicap" or "I'm an 18". We generally don't put a sign in front of the number because it is commonly known that we get to subtract strokes from our score.
However for professionals, who play better than par (or have handicaps that are less than 0), the convention is to say that they are a "Plus" X handicap.
So, if you are a 13, and I'm Phil Mickelson (let's assume is a +6), he would have to give you 19 strokes per round, which actually means you get to subtract 19 strokes from your score (more-or-less).