NEW! chazdillon case thread

I introduced this guy to Dan Whitten awhile back when I was at the Shane vs Mills match. I remember Dan mentioning to me after looking at his case some reasons why in the long run the cases would not hold up. But I guess that really doesn't matter since only a few people every got cases.

I go to factories all the time to get products made. Sitting in the conference room inspecting the samples I repeat the same points day after day in different factories. The phrase experience is the best teacher is pretty much as true a statement as exists. People who have little to no experience have no clue what the real world can do to a product. It takes experience to find that out.

What is sad is that some people have that knowledge and they try to give it to those who don't but those who don't refuse to use it. And so they repeat the mistakes of their predecessors to the detriment of everyone involved.

Mr. Dillon got in over his head by attempting to produce a product that he had little experience making. He charged too little for the time needed and quickly got upside down there. And he took on custom orders that required a lot of preparation and thought. I took a chance and sent him $250 that I will not see again. Doing what I do I should have known better but I figured that being in the area he was in that he had seen enough good cases to know what to do. I refuse to participate in the prosecution of Mr. Dillon because I feel complicit in his downfall. By encouraging him with an order when I should have seen the red flags I helped to put him in the situation he found himself in. He is not absolved of responsibility by any means and I sincerely hope that he makes restitution to myself and to all of the people who placed orders with him. I personally am not ready to try to send him to jail over it though.
 
Just a bump to see if there are any updates on this thread. Hope to hear some good news but not expecting it...
 
Sorry. He has to pay.

Bump.

I go to factories all the time to get products made. Sitting in the conference room inspecting the samples I repeat the same points day after day in different factories. The phrase experience is the best teacher is pretty much as true a statement as exists. People who have little to no experience have no clue what the real world can do to a product. It takes experience to find that out.

What is sad is that some people have that knowledge and they try to give it to those who don't but those who don't refuse to use it. And so they repeat the mistakes of their predecessors to the detriment of everyone involved.

Mr. Dillon got in over his head by attempting to produce a product that he had little experience making. He charged too little for the time needed and quickly got upside down there. And he took on custom orders that required a lot of preparation and thought. I took a chance and sent him $250 that I will not see again. Doing what I do I should have known better but I figured that being in the area he was in that he had seen enough good cases to know what to do. I refuse to participate in the prosecution of Mr. Dillon because I feel complicit in his downfall. By encouraging him with an order when I should have seen the red flags I helped to put him in the situation he found himself in. He is not absolved of responsibility by any means and I sincerely hope that he makes restitution to myself and to all of the people who placed orders with him. I personally am not ready to try to send him to jail over it though.
 
you can't be serious.................

mr. wilson, please delete this thread already, everytime i see it crop up i get a headache.

You should be happy. The money stayed there. I am owed three cases.

Didn't you say the best thing is when the money stays "there"?

I would have thought that the "best thing" would be to get the best product and keep as money in your own pocket to spend as you wish, rather than to allow the other person to spend the money as they wish to.

But you seem to have another idea.
 
You should be happy. The money stayed there. I am owed three cases.

Didn't you say the best thing is when the money stays "there"?

I would have thought that the "best thing" would be to get the best product and keep as money in your own pocket to spend as you wish, rather than to allow the other person to spend the money as they wish to.

But you seem to have another idea.

JB i'm sorry i was trying to promote murnak cases and support our north american economy, which isn't exactly in great shape.

I was just answering a thread where the OP was asking about what case to buy, and i gave my suggestion and reasons for it. I have nothing against the products you offer, they're very attractive, high quality, and well priced. Perhaps i should have left out the "BUY AMERICAN" sentiment, as unfortunately you construed it as an attack on you and your product, which it was not intended to be, buying American is apart of an appeal of a product manufactured in the US. not a jab at JB Cases. there are many advertising campaigns here in north america that promote "made in america".

Feel free to add "BUY CHINESE" in your advertising campaigns if you feel it would add any weight in promoting your products. perhaps then you won't feel as unfairly slighted the next time this topic comes up.

considering that you constantly feel that you are attacked by "internet trolls" following you around, i'm suprised that you sought out my post on this thread as an opportunity to lambaste me for my personal opinions. indeed, now who is the troll mr. barton?

you remind me of my brother, whom can never admit when he's wrong, which apparently is never.
 
JB i'm sorry i was trying to promote murnak cases and support our north american economy, which isn't exactly in great shape.

I was just answering a thread where the OP was asking about what case to buy, and i gave my suggestion and reasons for it. I have nothing against the products you offer, they're very attractive, high quality, and well priced. Perhaps i should have left out the "BUY AMERICAN" sentiment, as unfortunately you construed it as an attack on you and your product, which it was not intended to be, buying American is apart of an appeal of a product manufactured in the US. not a jab at JB Cases. there are many advertising campaigns here in north america that promote "made in america".

Feel free to add "BUY CHINESE" in your advertising campaigns if you feel it would add any weight in promoting your products. perhaps then you won't feel as unfairly slighted the next time this topic comes up.

considering that you constantly feel that you are attacked by "internet trolls" following you around, i'm suprised that you sought out my post on this thread as an opportunity to lambaste me for my personal opinions. indeed, now who is the troll mr. barton?

you remind me of my brother, whom can never admit when he's wrong, which apparently is never.
Ding,ding,ding we have a winner:bow-down:
 
JB i'm sorry i was trying to promote murnak cases and support our north american economy, which isn't exactly in great shape.

I was just answering a thread where the OP was asking about what case to buy, and i gave my suggestion and reasons for it. I have nothing against the products you offer, they're very attractive, high quality, and well priced. Perhaps i should have left out the "BUY AMERICAN" sentiment, as unfortunately you construed it as an attack on you and your product, which it was not intended to be, buying American is apart of an appeal of a product manufactured in the US. not a jab at JB Cases. there are many advertising campaigns here in north america that promote "made in america".

Feel free to add "BUY CHINESE" in your advertising campaigns if you feel it would add any weight in promoting your products. perhaps then you won't feel as unfairly slighted the next time this topic comes up.

considering that you constantly feel that you are attacked by "internet trolls" following you around, i'm suprised that you sought out my post on this thread as an opportunity to lambaste me for my personal opinions. indeed, now who is the troll mr. barton?

you remind me of my brother, whom can never admit when he's wrong, which apparently is never.

I chose not to respond in the other thread and take your stinky bait and turn that thread into another stupid America vs. the World debate. I felt that here in this thread where you want Wilson to close it and deprive everyone of the benefit of understanding the price of believing that they can get high quality custom work for unrealistically low prices. You want to deprive the forum of this experience and warning. I responded in THIS thread because of the fact that I am subscribed to it so I saw your post.

The original poster in the other thread was asking what the best VALUE is.

Value does not have a nationality. As you can see by reading this thread Chaz didn't exactly deliver any real good quality did he? So the money stayed "here" but the value isn't there.

Does your protect "North America" platform extend to Mexico? Because I notice you didn't recommend that people buy from Gil Castillo who has cases made in Mexico? Doesn't that count?

And how would you feel if you paid a guy say twice as much for a case than a comparable case made elsewhere and that guy ran right down to Best Buy and used your money to buy a big screen TV from China or a new Ipad or a new super video camera?

The point is that you are recommending that people spend MORE of THEIR money to SUPPORT someone else's business. That's not how the free market works. The free market works by encouraging competition so that competitors will strive to offer the best quality for the least amount possible so that consumers can afford to buy as many diverse things as they can afford. That all happens because of division of labor and a free market setting the price of labor.

If you think that Murnak cases are a better value than my cases then fine. Prove it with factual comparisons and not emotional manipulation.

Maybe I should put it out there that a big portion of the revenue from JB Cases goes to support my handicapped retired Navy Seal father, in AMERICA. Doesn't that count? I am sure I can come up with a bunch of emotional reasons why people should spend their money on the products we make.

How about the fact that Sterling Gaming employees 18 people in AMERICA?

How many does Jim employ? Since you want to make this an economics lesson shouldn't you be telling people to spend their money where it will do the most good.

Sterling has 18 people and their families to support. Good hardworking Americans and one Brit who is half American. Why don't you tell people to support that if you are truly concerned about providing income for (North) Americans.

The fact of is that you don't know jack and your premise is flawed. I don't know about your brother but I know that as far as this topic goes you are flat wrong. I could elaborate further but it's my experience that no amount of evidence changes bigoted and willfully ignorant minds.

But in the spirit of generosity and hope here is some free reading for you to help you understand how and why you are wrong.

http://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/

Lastly, all the "Buy American" advertising is designed to push your emotional buttons. If you look a little deeper you will find that many of those companies are global and source their parts from foreign lands, they operate call centers in foreign lands, and generally fudge quite a bit on the amount of actual "american-ness" of their products. It's a ploy to separate you from MORE of your money in most situations.

http://reason.com/archives/2011/11/03/the-stupidity-of-buy-american

http://reason.com/blog/2009/07/21/reasontv-is-your-ipod-unpatrio

I doubt you will take the time to go through this information but in case you do maybe you will take a bit of time to think about what you read and see.

http://reason.com/archives/2011/06/01/buy-american-is-un-american
 
Last edited:
Yeah, and it's me.
- value does have a nationality, the money one spends locally has a greater chance in benefiting the LOCAL economy. That's why cities encourage events which attract tourists to spend money in their cities to enhance the LOCAL economy.

- we all have responsibilities as consumers, from a economical and environmental standpoint which have very much come to light in the last 10 or so years that as consumers we should take a hard look at our lifestyles for the sake of our country and environment. It can't just be about value for the dollar anymore.

- i don't own a Castillo case, so i couldn't comment on them, just a Murnak. Otherwise they're probably very nice cases.

- "free market" is a sham, there's nothing free about it.

- FAIR competition is good, there is nothing fair about the Chinese government in how they are doing business. When local manufacturers cannot compete with foreign enterprise because their goods aren't bieng taxed enough, the renminbi is artificially devaluated, goods are being manufactured by low cost labour, and companies are producing goods at the cost of the environment, that is not fair.

John, as i mentioned before, my post in the thread where someone was looking for a case to buy was for their benefit. it was not an attack on you or your product. from your above tyrade i can only assume that you've felt you've had to defend yourself and company from previous scrutiny, and perhaps understandably so.

I still fail to understand your rationale in regard to you feeling it necessary to attack me in this manner (you indirectly used the words bigoted and ignorant). You and your company make great cases, that is well known. There will always be people who are looking for a great deal, heck i'm one of them. Your company, product, and yourself are judged on its own merits, you shouldn't have to defend anything. Perhaps it's your own conscience or guilt that makes you so defensive.

You however, have NO right to censor my opinion through this needless, self manufactured debate. I never expressed any distain for the way you do business. It's not like i said "jeeze why doesn't John Barton with all his talent set up shop in the U.S. and not China? we have leather, we have artisans....etc...etc...you can probably charge as much as justis to make up for the overhead...etc...etc..."


AS A CHINESE BORN CANADIAN CITIZEN, WHO IS PROUD OF HIS CHINESE-CANADIAN HERITAGE, AND CARES ABOUT HIS AMERICAN NEIGHBOURS TO THE SOUTH. DARN TOOTIN' I HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO EXPRESS MY THOUGHTS OVER WHAT CONCERNS NORTH AMERICA AND OUR ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT.

IF COWS WERE AN ENDANGERED SPECIES, I WOULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING ABOUT BUYING A SYNTHETIC CASE INSTEAD AS AN OPTION. I'M SURE YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN OK WITH THAT, BUT SOMETHING TELLS ME THAT I WOULDN'T HAVE TO DEBATE THE ISSUE WITH JACK JUSTICE, JIM MURNAK, OR DAN WHITTEN LIKE I AM WITH YOU.

JOHN, YOU CAN LEAVE THE CENSORSHIP IN CHINA!
 
Last edited:
Sweet... this thread just helped pass an hour at work on a day when I have very little to do. Has Chaz refunded everyone now? Gone to prison? Fled the country?? Eagerly awaiting the next installment (Not of The Fonz Vs JB tho!)
 
Yeah, and it's me.
No,its not you in this case.Your truly taking what the fonz is saying and twisting it like a pretzel.His comments are factual as well as informative.Not all of what your saying is wrong but as soon as the insults start the debate is over and you lose.
 
- value does have a nationality, the money one spends locally has a greater chance in benefiting the LOCAL economy. That's why cities encourage events which attract tourists to spend money in their cities to enhance the LOCAL economy.

Huh? You are confusing promotion with value. Yes of course when there is an INFLUX of money anywhere it benefits the locals. And what happens when that happens?

Competition happens and prices go down. Maybe if you care so much about your neighbors to the south (but apparently not the ones south of the southern American border) you should encourage them to NOT go to Canada on vacation but instead to stay in the USA and spend their money there.

But again promotion is not "value". Just because someone spends money on something doesn't mean that they are getting value for their money.



- we all have responsibilities as consumers, from a economical and environmental standpoint which have very much come to light in the last 10 or so years that as consumers we should take a hard look at our lifestyles for the sake of our country and environment. It can't just be about value for the dollar anymore.

So you fact check everything you buy? You know that the brands you purchase are made by ethical companies/people who spend your money on American goods? They hire legal labor? They recycle...... or is all you know that there is a "made in america" tag on it?

- i don't own a Castillo case, so i couldn't comment on them, just a Murnak. Otherwise they're probably very nice cases.

So if you did and you thought it was nice then you would recommend it since Mexico is part of North America?

- "free market" is a sham, there's nothing free about it.

Not when people like you try to pressure others into paying more for less.

- FAIR competition is good, there is nothing fair about the Chinese government in how they are doing business. When local manufacturers cannot compete with foreign enterprise because their goods aren't bieng taxed enough, the renminbi is artificially devaluated, goods are being manufactured by low cost labour, and companies are producing goods at the cost of the environment, that is not fair.

Oh please. I guess you have never heard of government subsidies in the USA, never heard of grants, government backed loans, no-bid contracts, pork barrel spending, tax breaks, government funded training for private sector employees, good old boy networks......

"fair" - what a load of crap. There is no such thing as fair competition in business. Someone always has some advantage that allows them to compete more effectively. As long as there is government then there is unfairness in business. As long as there are people there is unfairness in business.

John, as i mentioned before, my post in the thread where someone was looking for a case to buy was for their benefit. it was not an attack on you or your product. from your above tyrade i can only assume that you've felt you've had to defend yourself and company from previous scrutiny, and perhaps understandably so.

No I think that you had no good reason to toss in the buy usa nonsense.

I still fail to understand your rationale in regard to you feeling it necessary to attack me in this manner (you indirectly used the words bigoted and ignorant). You and your company make great cases, that is well known. There will always be people who are looking for a great deal, heck i'm one of them. Your company, product, and yourself are judged on its own merits, you shouldn't have to defend anything. Perhaps it's your own conscience or guilt that makes you so defensive.

See above. The reason I said bigoted is because you titled your post USA USA. The reason I said ignorant is because you are ignorant of the underlying economics. But you aren't interested in a direct comparison of quality/price without using the "buy American" emotional appeal to attempt to guilt trip the reader into making their choice based on a misguided appeal to economic patriotism. I have nothing to be guilty of but you do.

You can't make a valid argument why a consumer should buy a Murnak over my case WITHOUT playing the "made in America" card.

You however, have NO right to censor my opinion through this needless, self manufactured debate. I never expressed any distain for the way you do business. It's not like i said "jeeze why doesn't John Barton with all his talent set up shop in the U.S. and not China? we have leather, we have artisans....etc...etc...you can probably charge as much as justis to make up for the overhead...etc...etc..."

I am not censoring your opinion. I have no power to erase (censor) your posts. I am openly disagreeing with your advocacy and exposing your ignorance on this subject. I don't care if you question my business model or not. The point is that if a person asks what's the best value then you should try to explain why you think product x is the best value without playing the patriotism card.


AS A CHINESE BORN CANADIAN CITIZEN, WHO IS PROUD OF HIS CHINESE-CANADIAN HERITAGE, AND CARES ABOUT HIS AMERICAN NEIGHBOURS TO THE SOUTH. DARN TOOTIN' I HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO EXPRESS MY THOUGHTS OVER WHAT CONCERNS NORTH AMERICA AND OUR ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT.

Gee, now you're yelling and you call me defensive? Seems to me that only one of us is not clear about their "heritage".

So your concern extends to Mexico, it's part of North America as well. You can express your thoughts all you want to, no one is censoring you. As a human being I can express my opinion of your opinion. I just wish that your concerns were a result of actually educating yourself a little more and not just trying to push emotional buttons.

IF COWS WERE AN ENDANGERED SPECIES, I WOULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING ABOUT BUYING A SYNTHETIC CASE INSTEAD AS AN OPTION. I'M SURE YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN OK WITH THAT, BUT SOMETHING TELLS ME THAT I WOULDN'T HAVE TO DEBATE THE ISSUE WITH JACK JUSTICE, JIM MURNAK, OR DAN WHITTEN LIKE I AM WITH YOU.

So your opinion is that the way to fix the American economy is to "buy American"? Or is the North American economy you are concerned about? So buying Mexican is ok?

Debate what issue? Endangered cows or buy American? Why is it so hard for people to spell Jack's name right, it's Justis. Well, let's see Jack made cases in China and uses Chinese interiors so he is out. Whitten spent time in China exploring making cases here so I don't know what either of them would say to you.

JOHN, YOU CAN LEAVE THE CENSORSHIP IN CHINA!

Who has censored you? Censoring is erasing or blocking speech. Has anyone done that to you? You freely inserted your "USA USA" chant and no one censored it. Are you feeling bad because I am giving you my opinion? Not only did I not censor you I gave you some links you could use to educate yourself as to WHY I hold the opinions I do. Did you follow them and read the articles? ( I bet not) When someone else posts articles that support their point I go and read them and consider the points. Do you?

Maybe you should stick to objective things you know about. You have a Murnak, you feel it's a good case for the price then say that and leave the flag waving out of it.

Speaking of censorship was it not you who asked Wilson to delete this thread? Would that not be censoring all the people's voices who have been involved in this fiasco? Would that not be censoring the forum from a vivid warning to be careful with new makers offering stuff at too-good-to-be-true low prices?

I think you should put down the flag and study the issues a little deeper from both sides.
 
No,its not you in this case.Your truly taking what the fonz is saying and twisting it like a pretzel.His comments are factual as well as informative.Not all of what your saying is wrong but as soon as the insults start the debate is over and you lose.

Insults? Bigoted and ignorant are not insults if correctly applied. It's bigoted to espouse a "buy American" platform and ignorant of the economics.
 
Back
Top